On 11/16/05, William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes udev works, however works well is something else entirely. Udev has
> been the bane of my life a number of times - at least with devfs I had a
> chance of working it out. It often seems like we take two steps back
> with every new ap
Yes udev works, however works well is something else entirely. Udev has
been the bane of my life a number of times - at least with devfs I had a
chance of working it out. It often seems like we take two steps back
with every new approach, and take a lot of pain just to get back to
where we were.
On 11/16/05, Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 10:19 schrieb ext brullo nulla:
>
> > You mean there's still devfs in 2.6.14, but it is "hidden"?
> > What's the sense of this?
>
> It's very hard to remove devfs from the kernel. Just removing the configure
> o
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 10:19 schrieb ext brullo nulla:
> You mean there's still devfs in 2.6.14, but it is "hidden"?
> What's the sense of this?
It's very hard to remove devfs from the kernel. Just removing the configure
options for it makes it easier to put it in again, in case of to mu
> Correction: The config options have been removed, not just commented out.
> The devfs code is still there.
You mean there's still devfs in 2.6.14, but it is "hidden"?
What's the sense of this?
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 09:42 schrieb ext Dirk Heinrichs:
> Nope, not yet. Only the config options have been commented out.
Correction: The config options have been removed, not just commented out.
The devfs code is still there.
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +4
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 09:22 schrieb ext W.Kenworthy:
> (I think, without checking) devfs has been removed from 2.6.14 and
> everything is supposed to be udev from now on.
Nope, not yet. Only the config options have been commented out.
> First udev, install udev according to the gentoo g
(I think, without checking) devfs has been removed from 2.6.14 and
everything is supposed to be udev from now on.
A suggestion made out of frustration with 2.6.14 - use 2.6.13-r3 first.
Some kernel versions have had glitches with udev, and I know -r2 and -r3
are working for me on the i82k.
The re
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 08:56 schrieb ext Daevid Vincent:
> I've been running 2.6.10 for some time. Then I started reading some stuff
> that I should update my Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook to UDEV. So I
> followed the gentoo wiki page and used kernel 2.6.13. This caused (known)
> issues with
I've been running 2.6.10 for some time. Then I started reading some stuff
that I should update my Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook to UDEV. So I followed
the gentoo wiki page and used kernel 2.6.13. This caused (known) issues with
my nvidia driver and I couldn't get the USB mouse to work (yet the alps p
10 matches
Mail list logo
