On Wednesday, 7 May 2025 17:39:47 British Summer Time Anna wrote:
> Hi! I'm not satisfied with my partition layout, so I'm considering
> changing it. It currently looks like this (/dev/sda and /dev/sdc are
> SSDs, /dev/sdb is HDD):
>
> $ lsblk -A -o NAME,MODEL,SIZE,FSUSED,MOUNTPOINT,FSTYPE
> NAME
Anna wrote:
> Hi! I'm not satisfied with my partition layout, so I'm considering
> changing it. It currently looks like this (/dev/sda and /dev/sdc are
> SSDs, /dev/sdb is HDD):
>
> $ lsblk -A -o NAME,MODEL,SIZE,FSUSED,MOUNTPOINT,FSTYPE
> NAME MODEL SIZE FSUSED MOUNTPOINT
On 5/7/25 3:13 PM, Wol wrote:
> On 07/05/2025 17:39, Anna wrote:
>> If I had only one disk, I'd just make one big root partition. But
>> there are two SSDs, and I could need more than the smallest (111,8G)
>> disk allows to fit. I could combine them into singe logical
>> partition using L
> My wishes for the new layout are:
>
> * Encrypted /home partition. The rest of the system should stay
>unencrypted so it could be restarted by someone else without my
>intervention.
if you have a tpm, setting up clevis for tpm auto-unlock is also a
possibility here
>Though if /hom
On 07/05/2025 17:39, Anna wrote:
Hi! I'm not satisfied with my partition layout, so I'm considering
changing it. It currently looks like this (/dev/sda and /dev/sdc are
SSDs, /dev/sdb is HDD):
$ lsblk -A -o NAME,MODEL,SIZE,FSUSED,MOUNTPOINT,FSTYPE
NAME MODEL SIZE FSUSED
On 5/7/25 12:39 PM, Anna wrote:
> Hi! I'm not satisfied with my partition layout, so I'm considering
> changing it. It currently looks like this (/dev/sda and /dev/sdc are
> SSDs, /dev/sdb is HDD):
>
> $ lsblk -A -o NAME,MODEL,SIZE,FSUSED,MOUNTPOINT,FSTYPE
> NAME MODEL SIZE
Hi! I'm not satisfied with my partition layout, so I'm considering
changing it. It currently looks like this (/dev/sda and /dev/sdc are
SSDs, /dev/sdb is HDD):
$ lsblk -A -o NAME,MODEL,SIZE,FSUSED,MOUNTPOINT,FSTYPE
NAME MODEL SIZE FSUSED MOUNTPOINT FSTYPE
sdaSamsun
7 matches
Mail list logo
