Stroller wrote:
>
> On 28 Aug 2008, at 07:40, Suman Chakrabarty wrote:
>>
>> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>
>> After successful installation of Gentoo 2008 on an old Compaq Pressario
>> notebook, I was trying to emerge kde-meta on it, but was not
On 28 Aug 2008, at 07:40, Suman Chakrabarty wrote:
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
After successful installation of Gentoo 2008 on an old Compaq
Pressario
notebook, I was trying to emerge kde-meta on it, but was not
successful. :(
Please don't
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:42:49 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Who uses KDE nowadays anyway ;)
Linus :P
--
Neil Bothwick
Feminism: the radical notion that women are people.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am Montag, 16. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Iain Buchanan:
> Who uses KDE nowadays anyway ;)
/me does. Whenever I tried Gnome or XFCE in the past, they have been
deinstalled again faster than I could spell their names :-)
If I need something slim and fast, I take FVWM. :-)
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dir
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:38:34 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> Let me get this striaght: Claws will change your "from" account
> depending on what mail folder you're in when you hit "new"? If so, I
> switching to claws!
From: and To: if you want, signatures too.
--
Neil Bothwick
Madness takes i
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 08:16 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Freitag, 13. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Iain Buchanan:
>
> > 1. find email from list
> > 2. click email address in "to" field (new email to that recipient is
> > created)
> > 3. write subject
> > 4. write email
> > 5. send
>
> or (in KMail,
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 00:58 -0300, luis jure wrote:
> El Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:17:42 -0600
> "Conway S. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > In my version of Claws, this only works for News folders, not
> > for regular mail folders. Am I missing something? Are you using
> > Gmane or some suc
El Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:17:42 -0600
"Conway S. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> In my version of Claws, this only works for News folders, not
> for regular mail folders. Am I missing something? Are you using
> Gmane or some such mail/news proxy? Is this a new feature in 3.4?
i'm using (ol
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:40:34 +0100
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Claws Mail, hit New while in the ML folder :)
>
In my version of Claws, this only works for News folders, not
for regular mail folders. Am I missing something? Are you using
Gmane or some such mail/news proxy? Is
El Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:40:34 +0100
Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> In Claws Mail, hit New while in the ML folder :)
wow, years using claws mail, and i wasn't aware of this feature...
thanks.
(i also discovered other features, like default account, spell
dictionary, etc)
--
gentoo
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:25:18 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > In Claws Mail, hit New while in the ML folder :)
>
> what if I am in a ml folder but don't want to send a mail to that ml?
> Removing adress again?
Yes, unless you habitually write mails to other addresses while in
mailing li
On Freitag, 13. Juni 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:16:11 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Who has a shorter way? ;-)
>
> In Claws Mail, hit New while in the ML folder :)
what if I am in a ml folder but don't want to send a mail to that ml? Removing
adress again?
--
gentoo-u
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:12:53 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > In Claws Mail, hit New while in the ML folder :)
>
> That would be as short, but not shorter, right?
It would if you wrote a shorter email :P
--
Neil Bothwick
Random access is the optimum of the mass storages.
signature.asc
De
Am Freitag, 13. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:16:11 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Who has a shorter way? ;-)
>
> In Claws Mail, hit New while in the ML folder :)
That would be as short, but not shorter, right?
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | T
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:16:11 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Who has a shorter way? ;-)
In Claws Mail, hit New while in the ML folder :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Press any key to continue or any other key to quit
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am Freitag, 13. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Iain Buchanan:
> 1. find email from list
> 2. click email address in "to" field (new email to that recipient is
> created)
> 3. write subject
> 4. write email
> 5. send
or (in KMail, given that one uses its mailing list functions):
1a. hit --n in the folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Stroller wrote:
|
| On 12 Jun 2008, at 02:41, Chris Walters wrote:
[snip my mumbo jumbo]
|
| The problem with pointing it out privately is that that doesn't educate
| anyone else - thus it's more work to point it out privately to the next
| person,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
PaulNM wrote:
| Chris Walters wrote:
|
|>
|> Everyone makes mistakes, and it is can be good to point them out,
|> though I do
|> think this thread is a bit of overkill - a private message to the
|> person who
|> made the mistake is usually enough.
|
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 21:11 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:26:29 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
> > > I guess most of us choose the reply-button, cause it' easier than
> > > having to look-up the email address.
> >
> > My email client allows me to right-click on a recipient of
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:26:29 +0100, Stroller wrote:
> > I guess most of us choose the reply-button, cause it' easier than
> > having to look-up the email address.
>
> My email client allows me to right-click on a recipient of an
> existing message and choose "new message", creating an empty
On 12 Jun 2008, at 18:07, Thomas Pedersen wrote:
...
(Just to take this further; you good argue that the mail clients is
using a wrong method of detecting these threads, cause it depends
on the users' habits.
No, I'd disagree with this.
If the topic starts off as "ALSA Mixer problems" and
Stroller skrev:
On 12 Jun 2008, at 02:41, Chris Walters wrote:
...
Everyone makes mistakes, and it is can be good to point them out,
though I do
think this thread is a bit of overkill - a private message to the
person who
made the mistake is usually enough.
The problem with pointing it out
On 12 Jun 2008, at 02:41, Chris Walters wrote:
...
Everyone makes mistakes, and it is can be good to point them out,
though I do
think this thread is a bit of overkill - a private message to the
person who
made the mistake is usually enough.
The problem with pointing it out privately is t
Chris Walters wrote:
Everyone makes mistakes, and it is can be good to point them out, though
I do
think this thread is a bit of overkill - a private message to the person
who
made the mistake is usually enough.
I agree the thread is overkill, the first message was not.
Stroller's message
On Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008, William Kenworthy wrote:
> too old to stop now ... been at it since the 90's when I first started
> using email ...
I am sure even back then people told you to stop it. Or did you only mail
AOlusers ;P
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
too old to stop now ... been at it since the 90's when I first started
using email ...
:)
BillK
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 05:25 +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> so when will you stop top posting?
too old to stop now ... been at it since the 90's when I first started
using email ...
:)
BillK
On Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008, William Kenworthy wrote:
> at one time I had a couple of people have a go at me over thread
> hi-jacking. Turned out to be a bug in THEIR version of KMail. I did
> enjoy sticking the boot in as one of them was most ungracious about it.
>
> Moral: make sure you are ri
Alan, on rereading this it might look like I am having a poke at you but
this is not the case - its just the message I replied to to enter the
thread.
Being publicly sorry for stuffing up :)
BillK
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10:52 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> at one time I had a couple of people
at one time I had a couple of people have a go at me over thread
hi-jacking. Turned out to be a bug in THEIR version of KMail. I did
enjoy sticking the boot in as one of them was most ungracious about it.
Moral: make sure you are right then be nice and polite - or accept the
VERY PUBLIC conseque
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hal Martin wrote:
| Alan McKinnon wrote:
|> On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
[snip]
|> No, he did not start a new thread. Other wise why does his mail have
|> this header;
|>
|> In-Reply-To:
|> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
| Quite right, m
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
Using Thunderbird it appeared to be a new thread, the same applies to
the GMail web interface.
Interesting. I wonder what mechanism those clients use to determine
threads then (I use neither myself)?
Actually, in threaded m
On Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
> > Using Thunderbird it appeared to be a new thread, the same applies to
> > the GMail web interface.
>
> Interesting. I wonder what mechanism those clients use to determine
> threads then (I use neithe
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
> Using Thunderbird it appeared to be a new thread, the same applies to
> the GMail web interface.
Interesting. I wonder what mechanism those clients use to determine
threads then (I use neither myself)?
--
Alan McKinnon
alan dot mckinnon at gmail d
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:42:32 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Please don't hijack threads like this.
>
> Even if that were an example of thread hijacking, are you perfect?
> Have you never made a mistake?
What is the relevance of that. We all make mistakes, some learn fro them
and help othe
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
[snip]
I'm sorry, but I fail to see why the above example mentioned
qualifies as Thread Hijacking. He started a new thread to pose his
question, and, if anything, was only being indirect in asking it.
No, he did not st
Thomas Pedersen schrieb:
Two points:
1) Yeah you're right about not living in a glass house, and make a big
deal out of nothing ;)
2) Thanks for letting us know about the differences about clicking
reply and compose new ... I'm actually sure not all of us was aware
about this difference
J
Two points:
1) Yeah you're right about not living in a glass house, and make a big
deal out of nothing ;)
2) Thanks for letting us know about the differences about clicking reply
and compose new ... I'm actually sure not all of us was aware about this
difference
Just a comment...
Thomas
-
On Wednesday 11 June 2008, Hal Martin wrote:
[snip]
> I'm sorry, but I fail to see why the above example mentioned
> qualifies as Thread Hijacking. He started a new thread to pose his
> question, and, if anything, was only being indirect in asking it.
No, he did not start a new thread. Other wis
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 05:54:35PM +0100, Stroller wrote:
> Please don't hijack threads like this.
Even if that were an example of thread hijacking, are you perfect?
Have you never made a mistake?
If someone does it over and over, then complain. Otherwise buy
yourself a glass house.
--
Stroller wrote:
On 10 Jun 2008, at 21:55, Thomas Pedersen wrote:
Was thinking of buying the Western Digital' My Book® Home Edition™,
specially because of the eSATA connection...
I heard they have an internal USB-hub for making the capacity gauge
working.
I'm sorry, but I fail to see why the a
On 10 Jun 2008, at 21:55, Thomas Pedersen wrote:
Was thinking of buying the Western Digital' My Book® Home Edition™,
specially because of the eSATA connection...
I heard they have an internal USB-hub for making the capacity gauge
working.
Please don't hijack threads like this.
http://en.
On 10 Apr 2008, at 16:29, Mario Ignacio Rodríguez Cortés wrote:
...
I have a problem at the moment that i try to execute a command as a
sudo
user, quikly, I have two machines, the first is my LDAP server and the
second is my client on LDAP ...
Please don't hijack threads like this:
http:/
42 matches
Mail list logo
