Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 10:29 schrieb ext Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.:
> IMO, finding a binary in /bin or /sbin that links to a library in /usr
> (including /usr/local etc.) is probably grounds for a bug report, even if
> it's not currently causing any problems.
Yep.
> > So you
> > have to be ca
On Monday 27 February 2006 23:01, Zac Slade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question':
> On Monday 27 February 2006 00:48, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Wrong. Switch to runlevel 1 (using "telinit 1"), which is for
> > ma
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 03:03, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Oops, you're right, telinit 1 doesn't work as expected in Gentoo (are there
> any bugreports about it?). However, I can reboot into RL 1 just fine and
> umount /usr w/o problems. I can also use ls just fine with /usr unmounted,
> all fs mai
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 06:01 schrieb ext Zac Slade:
> On Monday 27 February 2006 00:48, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Wrong. Switch to runlevel 1 (using "telinit 1"), which is for
> > maintenance. In RL 1, no user processes are running and you can umount
> > everything except /.
>
> Partially ri
On Monday 27 February 2006 00:48, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Wrong. Switch to runlevel 1 (using "telinit 1"), which is for maintenance.
> In RL 1, no user processes are running and you can umount everything
> except /.
Partially right. Gentoo has several gotchas in runlevel 1. If /usr is a
seperate
Am Samstag, 25. Februar 2006 11:44 schrieb ext Jarry:
> I mean I can not resize them off-line because I can not unmount them
> while system is running :-)
Wrong. Switch to runlevel 1 (using "telinit 1"), which is for maintenance.
In RL 1, no user processes are running and you can umount everythi
Holly Bostick wrote:
> Alexander Skwar schreef:
>>
>> Okay, so the following fs are online resizable, according to you:
>>
>> - reiser3 - xfs - jfs - ext2, ext3
>>
>> That's pretty much "every FS", isn't it?
>
> Yes, but as far as I know from the docs, jfs and xfs can only be *grown*
> online,
Alexander Skwar schreef:
>
> Okay, so the following fs are online resizable, according to you:
>
> - reiser3 - xfs - jfs - ext2, ext3
>
> That's pretty much "every FS", isn't it?
Yes, but as far as I know from the docs, jfs and xfs can only be *grown*
online, not shrunk, which could be a proble
Jarry wrote:
> Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
>>>I could not resize /usr or /var off-line,
>>
>> That's wrong. I suppose that those are your ext* fs?
>> If so, you can perfectly fine resize those fs while
>> they are offline.
>
> I mean I can not resize them off-line because I can not unmount them
> w
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>>I could not resize /usr or /var off-line,
>
> That's wrong. I suppose that those are your ext* fs?
> If so, you can perfectly fine resize those fs while
> they are offline.
I mean I can not resize them off-line because I can not unmount them
while system is running :-)
M
Jarry wrote:
> Zac Slade wrote:
>
>> reiser3, resizable online in two ways
>> 1)resize_reiserfs /path/to/dev
>> 2)mount -o remount,resize /path/to/dev
>> XFS, MUST be mounted to resize use xfs_grow /mount/point
>> JFS, resizable online with a mount -o remount,resize /path/to/dev
>> ext
Zac Slade wrote:
> reiser3, resizable online in two ways
> 1)resize_reiserfs /path/to/dev
> 2)mount -o remount,resize /path/to/dev
> XFS, MUST be mounted to resize use xfs_grow /mount/point
> JFS, resizable online with a mount -o remount,resize /path/to/dev
> ext2/3, resizable offlin
John Jolet wrote:
>
>> What an unenlighten troll. I have plenty of experience with AIX's
>> volume
>> manager. LVM2 can stand up to it any day. As a matter of fact
>> Linux's LVM
>> is about to completely surpass what is available in AIX. LVM2 can
>> do cluster
>> locking and management.
John Jolet wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2006, at 9:35 PM, Zac Slade wrote:
>
>> On Friday 24 February 2006 00:03, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>>> John Jolet wrote:
Remember, the fs cannot be mounted when you extend it.
>>>
>>> That's wrong. Every FS can be extended online, even ext{2,3}
>>> with certain pa
Zac Slade wrote:
> On Friday 24 February 2006 00:03, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>> John Jolet wrote:
>> > Remember, the fs cannot be mounted when you extend it.
>>
>> That's wrong. Every FS can be extended online, even ext{2,3}
>> with certain patches IIRC.
> WRONG!!! (or partially anyway) Here's the
What an unenlighten troll. I have plenty of experience with AIX's
volume
manager. LVM2 can stand up to it any day. As a matter of fact
Linux's LVM
is about to completely surpass what is available in AIX. LVM2 can
do cluster
locking and management. You can use LVM2 with Multipathing to
On Friday 24 February 2006 22:13, John Jolet wrote:
> okay, i'll rephrase being an old aix hand... with the (possible)
> exeption of reiser I, personally, would not trust any filesystem
> to resize without being unmounted. but then, compared to the aix
> lvm, which can be resized with orac
On Feb 24, 2006, at 9:35 PM, Zac Slade wrote:
On Friday 24 February 2006 00:03, Alexander Skwar wrote:
John Jolet wrote:
Remember, the fs cannot be mounted when you extend it.
That's wrong. Every FS can be extended online, even ext{2,3}
with certain patches IIRC.
WRONG!!! (or partially any
On Friday 24 February 2006 00:03, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> John Jolet wrote:
> > Remember, the fs cannot be mounted when you extend it.
>
> That's wrong. Every FS can be extended online, even ext{2,3}
> with certain patches IIRC.
WRONG!!! (or partially anyway) Here's the rundown:
reiser3, resizabl
Worked! Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 5:57 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question
On Thursday 23 February 2006 17:29, "CR Little"
<[EM
John Jolet wrote:
> Remember, the fs cannot be mounted when you extend it.
That's wrong. Every FS can be extended online, even ext{2,3}
with certain patches IIRC.
Alexander Skwar
--
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression
when you lose yours.
-- Har
On Thursday 23 February 2006 17:29, "CR Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question':
> Apparently when I created my first drive pv. I missed something as well
>
> I have /dev/sda8-14 which are not set allocatable
>
ginal Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 4:35 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question
On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:59, John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about
'
On Thursday 23 February 2006 15:59, John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about
'Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question':
> Remember, the fs cannot be mounted when you extend it.
LOL!
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy
--
gen
Title: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question
On 2/23/06 2:22 PM, "CR Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I’m having a problem with LVM.
I setup a volume group it had 5.91G in Free PE/Size now states 0/0
I have a logical volume inside that I tried to extend
It now
The unmount/ resize2fs /dev/vg/home worked thanks!/
-Original Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 3:36 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question
On Thursday 23 February 2006 14
On Thursday 23 February 2006 14:58, "CR Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'RE: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question':
> I'm using ext3
A: Because it reverses the logical progression of the conversation.
Q: Why shouldn't I top post?
Aaaanywa
On Thursday 23 February 2006 02:22 pm, CR Little wrote:
> I'm having a problem with LVM.
>
> I setup a volume group it had 5.91G in Free PE/Size now states 0/0
>
> --- Volume group ---
>
> VG Name vg
>
>
> VG Size 55.91 GB
>
> PE Size 4.00 MB
>
>
CR Little wrote:
> It now states 10.91 GB for LV Size. This lv is mounted to /home when I
> ran lvextend –L+5.91G /dev/vg/home it extended the lv but when you run
> df-h it doesn’t show an increased size.
Of course not - why should it? Increasing the size of an
LV doesn't change the size of the f
I'm using ext3
-Original Message-
From: Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 2:41 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question
On Thursday 23 February 2006 14:22, "CR Little"
&l
On Thursday 23 February 2006 14:22, "CR Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about '[gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question':
> I'm having a problem with LVM.
>
> I setup a volume group it had 5.91G in Free PE/Size now states 0/0
> I have a logical vo
I’m having a problem with LVM.
I setup a volume group it had 5.91G in Free PE/Size now states 0/0
--- Volume group ---
VG
Name
vg
System ID
Format
lvm2
Metadata Areas 3
Metadata Sequence No 9
VG
Access
read/write
32 matches
Mail list logo
