Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-07 Thread Joseph
On 04/07/09 19:48, Arttu V. wrote: On 4/7/09, Joseph wrote: I boot from CD, chroot and tried to recompile the gcc but it has been compiling for over two hours and it can not finish, I think it is in some kind of loop mode? That "loop" is the multilib profile you're probably using, which will

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-07 Thread Arttu V.
On 4/7/09, Joseph wrote: > I boot from CD, chroot and tried to recompile the gcc but it has been > compiling for over two hours and it can not finish, I think it is in some > kind of loop mode? That "loop" is the multilib profile you're probably using, which will compile you both 64-bit and 32-b

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-07 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:19:09 -0600 Joseph wrote: > I boot from CD, chroot and tried to recompile the gcc but it has been > compiling for over two hours and it can not finish, I think it is in some > kind of > loop mode? GCC takes a long time to compile and re-compile itself with itself, but si

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-06 Thread Joseph
On 04/06/09 22:00, Jorge Morais wrote: On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600 I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on AMD64 I recompile my system using this new flag and have a lot of problems. an examples new xorg-server-1.5... would not compile, I switch back to my prev

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-06 Thread Jorge Morais
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600 Joseph wrote: > On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote: > >Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and > >performed "emerge system" ? > >What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... > > > >-- > > ~adj~

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-05 Thread Joseph
On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote: Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and performed "emerge system" ? What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... -- ~adj~ I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-04 Thread Graham Murray
Mike Kazantsev writes: > -mtune=native can be dropped if -march=native is there already. It is still worthwhile keeping it in CFLAGS as some packages remove or replace the '-march' flag.

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-04 Thread Christopher Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote: > Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and > performed "emerge system" ? > What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... > > -- > ~adj~ I am afraid I can't really

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-03 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:47:25 +0530 Masood Ahmed wrote: > alain.didierj...@free.fr writes: > > I like the -march=native and -mtune=native options. It's the new thing > in gcc 4.3 series. -mtune=native can be dropped if -march=native is there already. -- Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net signatur

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-03 Thread Jerry McBride
On Friday 03 April 2009 05:15:21 pm Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:47:25 +0530, Masood Ahmed wrote: > > I like the -march=native and -mtune=native options. > > As long as you don't use distcc with differing hardware. I did that by accident once and trust me, it's a unforgettable les

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:47:25 +0530, Masood Ahmed wrote: > I like the -march=native and -mtune=native options. As long as you don't use distcc with differing hardware. -- Neil Bothwick "Ubuntu" is an ancient African word, meaning "I can't configure Slackware". signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-03 Thread alain . didierjean
Selon alain.didierj...@free.fr: > Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and > performed "emerge system" ? > What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... Thanks for the fast answers. It seems there's no problems... -- ~adj~

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-03 Thread Masood Ahmed
alain.didierj...@free.fr writes: > Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and > performed "emerge system" ? I did upgrade to 4.3 gcc series from 4.1. There was no compile error's (I'm using ~x86 branch). Both emerge -e system and emerge -e world done using new gcc. > W

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-03 Thread Thomas Kahle
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote: > Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and > performed "emerge system" ? > What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... > > -- > ~adj~ > Yes, I did it at the beginning of the year, it was more or less painfree.

[gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-03 Thread alain . didierjean
Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and performed "emerge system" ? What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... -- ~adj~