Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 14:53:22 -0300 Facundo Curti wrote: > > > > Debian, and Ubuntu are desktop platforms. Yes they are widely used > > in production server environments (the slow > > ones that is) however, our last experience with Debian squeeze as a > > whole (ie, source tree, reliability, perfo

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

> > Debian, and Ubuntu are desktop platforms. Yes they are widely used in > production server environments (the slow > ones that is) however, our last experience with Debian squeeze as a whole > (ie, source tree, reliability, performance), > was inhospitable. Dare I say, it was making as nauseated

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

Just because google does it, does not mean it's right. If you are going to make a suggestion, please make it an educated one. For example: "I prefer RHEL because of it's mature GFS, and CMAN support which is Red Hat's implementation of global file system and cluster computing." Or you could even

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

On 2014-02-20 8:03 PM, Facundo Curti wrote: Fsacundo impolitely omitted attribution, so I have to add it back... > I said: That is such total FUD I just can't even say anything else about it without using some unsavory words. You no need to be disrespectfull... How was my comment disrespe

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

Thanks a lot. On 2014年02月21日 02:41, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >> Original Message >> Subject: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production >> environment? >> Date:Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800 >> From:Franklin Wang >> To: gentoo-ser...@lists.gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

Thanks for your help. The choice for HPC can be more free. I prepare to try it in datacenter, for FTP first, and then web server, mail server and so forth. Of course, I still think it's better to use rhel or suse for database, CRM and others. On 2014年02月20日 22:35, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi, > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

On 21 Feb 2014 06:33, "Facundo Curti" wrote: > > > the advantage of clustering servers though is you can take one out and update it. if you use a distributed compliation [1] and tell portage to keep the binaries [2] you can take a few out and do them together, then the remainder do not require c

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

> the advantage of clustering servers though is you can take one out and update it. if you use a distributed compliation [1] and tell portage to keep the binaries [2] you can take a few out and do them together, then the remainder do not require compilation as the compile has been It is True. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

> Original Message > Subject: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production > environment? > Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800 > From: Franklin Wang > To: gentoo-ser...@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-clus...@lists.gentoo.org > > Hi all, > > I'm not

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

Hi, On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:40:59 +0800 Franklin Wang wrote: > I'm not familiar with gentoo server and cluster. So could you tell me > the experience about them? Thanks. We have successful experience with Gentoo on both production servers (someone call this area "enterprise", though I dislike such

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

On 2014-02-20 7:04 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2014-02-19 7:53 PM, Facundo Curti wrote: This is true, but gentoo is a little unstable to use on production. The system must be on 365 days/year. ¿and when you need to update the system? This will use all the processor and the system will be overloade

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

On 2014-02-19 7:53 PM, Facundo Curti wrote: This is true, but gentoo is a little unstable to use on production. The system must be on 365 days/year. ¿and when you need to update the system? This will use all the processor and the system will be overloaded. This means users can't use the system w

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

On 02/20/2014 12:53 AM, Facundo Curti wrote: I think a "more stable" distro is better for production. My choice is debian. I think you cant find nothing more stable that debian... >Gentoo makes the

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

Debian's powerful and stable, and I like apt very much. Gentoo and arch can be used for soho. Google uses red hat in datacenter with a customized kernel, and facebook started the project of open compute. are several RISC processors going to die? On 2014年02月20日 08:53,

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

On 20 Feb 2014 06:23, "Facundo Curti" wrote: > > I think a "more stable" distro is better for production. My choice is debian. I think you cant find nothing more stable that debian... > > > >Gentoo makes the best server os because it's a custom built os where the admin knows each and every aspect

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

I think a "more stable" distro is better for production. My choice is debian. I think you cant find nothing more stable that debian... >Gentoo makes the best server os because it's a custom built os where the admin knows each and every aspect of the os. This is true, but gentoo is a little unstab

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

Maybe it's intresting, although I prefer to use red hat, suse or ubuntu in datacenter as Google. Slackware servers're not very poppular here On 2014年02月20日 08:14, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > > On 20 Feb 2014 05:12, "Franklin Wang" > wrote: > > > > and what about slackwa

Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

On 20 Feb 2014 05:12, "Franklin Wang" wrote: > > and what about slackware for server? > > > Original Message > Subject: > How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? > Date: > Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800 > From: > Franklin Wang > To: > gentoo-ser...@lis

[gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?

and what about slackware for server? Original Message Subject:How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:28 +0800 From: Franklin Wang To: gentoo-ser...@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-clus...@lists.gentoo.org Hi a