On Nov 17, 2012 12:16 PM, "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:54:10PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
> >
> > I don't remember if Richard is on the -user list or not. I've no doubt
> > he'd be happy to have your assistance; you put in a lot of work
> > getting mdev to work for your purpos
Walter Dnes wrote:
> Lennart Poettering (and to a lesser extent Sievers) has pissed off a
> lot of people (users, sysadmins, and developers). The situation
> resembles the Xfree86 ==> Xorg revolt. Hopefully, the end result will
> be similar.
Speaking of. I went to the xfree86 home page. They s
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:54:10PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
>
> I don't remember if Richard is on the -user list or not. I've no doubt
> he'd be happy to have your assistance; you put in a lot of work
> getting mdev to work for your purposes. (Whatever happened with that,
> anyway? Or am I getting
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Dale wrote:
> Walter Dnes wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:24:54PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
> Well, it appears we have someone willing to for
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:24:54PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
>> >>
>> >> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Y
Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:24:54PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !!
Me, I'm looking forward to se
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:24:54PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
> >>
> >> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !!
> >> Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this wor
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
>>
>> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !!
>> Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test
>> run when it gets ready. Since it is a fork
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
>
> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !!
> Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test
> run when it gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long,
> I hope.
BTW, this has hit Sla
Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
>
> LOL
>
> Now seriously:
>
> You should follow the discussion in -project. Someone (I forgot who
> exactly) has made a personal commitment to within a month produce a
> serviceable udev fork, at least a Proof of Concept. And IIRC, hwoarang
> is going to 'test the waters' wit
On Nov 14, 2012 10:02 AM, "Walter Dnes" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
> >
> > Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !! Me,
> > I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test run
> > when it gets ready. Since it is a fo
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
>
> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !! Me,
> I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test run
> when it gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long, I hope.
Might even get me to c
On 2012-11-13 04:20, Dale wrote:
> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev.
>Yeppie !! Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this
>works and giving it a test run when it gets ready.
>Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long, I hope.
Beautiful news indeed! Thanks for the heads up
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote:
>
> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !! Me, I'm
> looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test run when it
> gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long, I hope.
>
> I wonder what
I think we also ought to contact Linus, to have some input on what the
forked-udev (vdev? gdev? nlpdev?) *shouldn't* be. Lest we tread the same
path that led to him calling udev 'stupid'.
Just my 2 cents. Probably worthless :-|
Rgds,
--
On Nov 13, 2012 4:26 PM, "Dale" wrote:
> Michael Hampicke
Michael Hampicke wrote:
> Am 13.11.2012 04:20, schrieb Dale:
>>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
>> Date:Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500
>> From:Richard Yao
>> Reply-To:gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org
>> To
Am 13.11.2012 04:20, schrieb Dale:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500
> From: Richard Yao
> Reply-To: gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org
> To: gentoo-proj...@lists.
Original Message
Subject:[gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500
From: Richard Yao
Reply-To: gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org
To: gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org
Richard Yao wrote:
> Dear Everyone,
>
> It
18 matches
Mail list logo
