On Tuesday 14 February 2006 15:14, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb symlink question':
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:43:21 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > > ln doesn't overwrite symlinks to directories, although this is no
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:43:21 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > ln doesn't overwrite symlinks to directories, although this is not
> > mentioned in the man page. Either delete the link first, or emerge
> > your new kernel source with the symlink USE flag.
>
> That's just not true. Heck, I
On Thursday 09 February 2006 02:38, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] Dumb symlink question':
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:45:53 +, Stroller wrote:
> > This has been bugging me for some time, but I've never gotten around
> >
On Thursday 09 February 2006 01:45, Stroller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-user] Dumb symlink
question':
> This has been bugging me for some time, but I've never gotten around
> to posting about it here before. Why doesn't the symlink get
> overw
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 07:45:53 +, Stroller wrote:
> This has been bugging me for some time, but I've never gotten around
> to posting about it here before. Why doesn't the symlink get
> overwritten, please?
ln doesn't overwrite symlinks to directories, although this is not
mentioned in the m
This has been bugging me for some time, but I've never gotten around
to posting about it here before. Why doesn't the symlink get
overwritten, please? The behaviour I see below seems quite at odds to
the documentation in the man page (but then, perhaps I simply haven't
read the mapage prope
6 matches
Mail list logo
