On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:19:53 +1100, Brian Parish wrote:
> Removing the initramfs seemed like the line of least resistance here,
> so being basically lazy, that's what I did. /dev/md0 is now created
> and I can create my RAID array happily enough.
>
> This still doesn't survive a reboot though.
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005, Brian Parish wrote:
> I have now implemented a smooth work-around by:
>
> 1. Setting the RAID in fstab to noauto and no checking
> 2. Creating a script in /etc/init.d which assembles and mounts the RAID set
> 3. Adding this script to the default group using rc-update
Yes, thi
On Saturday 19 November 2005 14:15, Brian Parish wrote:
> > This still doesn't survive a reboot though. i.e. I have to run the mdadm
> > --create command again. I assumed that this required something in
> > mdadm.conf, so I updated that with all the magic numbers shown by mdadm
> > -D. No change
On Saturday 19 November 2005 16:19, Brian Parish wrote:
> On Sunday 13 November 2005 17:33, Brian Parish wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 17:23, Richard Fish wrote:
> > > On 11/12/05, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 13 November 2005 01:49, Brian Parish wrote:
> > > >
On Sunday 13 November 2005 17:33, Brian Parish wrote:
> On Sunday 13 November 2005 17:23, Richard Fish wrote:
> > On 11/12/05, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sunday 13 November 2005 01:49, Brian Parish wrote:
> > > > I am trying to add a software RAID 5 disk set to an existing ma
On Sunday 13 November 2005 17:23, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 11/12/05, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 01:49, Brian Parish wrote:
> > > I am trying to add a software RAID 5 disk set to an existing machine
> > > installed using genkernel. All the RAID support is
On 11/12/05, Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 13 November 2005 01:49, Brian Parish wrote:
> > I am trying to add a software RAID 5 disk set to an existing machine
> > installed using genkernel. All the RAID support is compiled into the
> > kernel, but no /dev/md? device files ex
On Sunday 13 November 2005 01:49, Brian Parish wrote:
> I am trying to add a software RAID 5 disk set to an existing machine
> installed using genkernel. All the RAID support is compiled into the
> kernel, but no /dev/md? device files exist. I can create these using mknod
> and make the RAID, but
On 11/12/05, Brian Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to add a software RAID 5 disk set to an existing machine installed
> using genkernel. All the RAID support is compiled into the kernel, but
> no /dev/md? device files exist. I can create these using mknod and make the
> RAID, but
I am trying to add a software RAID 5 disk set to an existing machine installed
using genkernel. All the RAID support is compiled into the kernel, but
no /dev/md? device files exist. I can create these using mknod and make the
RAID, but they don't survive a reboot. How do I tell udev to create
Scott Storck wrote:
I use the dmraid tools, but they are not in portage yet. Why not, I
don't know.
There has been a bug open in bugzilla about this for a long time, but
nothing (noticabliy) is happening with this.
I however, boot from such a partition, so that ebuild alone doesn't help me.
I w
Emanuele Morozzi schrieb:
Me:
Hallo, I recently passed to udev, so now I cannot use my Raid.
Gentoo si installed in /dev/hda.
The Raid is a striping raid composed of /dev/sda /dev/sdb and consists
of 4 partitions. I created it installing windows (work reason).
The SATA cont
Me:
Hallo, I recently passed to udev, so now I cannot use my Raid.
Gentoo si installed in /dev/hda.
The Raid is a striping raid composed of /dev/sda /dev/sdb and consists
of 4 partitions. I created it installing windows (work reason).
The SATA controller is a Silicon 3512.
Before, with devfs, I
Richard Fish wrote:
Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
Can anybody help me?
Sorry, I think you have us stumped. If you run:
dmraid ...
dmsetup ls
and dmsetup reports no devices, then my guess is that dmraid is
misconfigured or broken. But I don't know enough about dmraid to help.
I will in abou
Emanuele Morozzi schrieb:
Can anybody help me?
Sorry, but I seem to have deleted this thread, and I can't remember
exactly what all you wrote.
If I remember correctly, you have a SATA raid controler on which you
created a raid over two complete disks, right?
-Scott
--
gentoo-user@gentoo
Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
> Can anybody help me?
>
>
Sorry, I think you have us stumped. If you run:
dmraid ...
dmsetup ls
and dmsetup reports no devices, then my guess is that dmraid is
misconfigured or broken. But I don't know enough about dmraid to help.
I will in about 3-4 months, when I u
Can anybody help me?
Scott Storck wrote:
Emanuele Morozzi schrieb:
You were right, now I have compiled the kernel with
"CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=y", but it's the same as before; there are not
peculiar errors, but dmraid continues not to create the devices in
/dev/mapper.
Richard Fish wrote:
This
Scott Storck wrote:
Emanuele Morozzi schrieb:
You were right, now I have compiled the kernel with
"CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=y", but it's the same as before; there are not
peculiar errors, but dmraid continues not to create the devices in
/dev/mapper.
Richard Fish wrote:
This means that you do not
Richard Fish wrote:
What does "dmsetup ls" show (after running dmraid)?
Did it create /dev/sil_* instead??
More info at:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-244941-highlight-dmraid.html
Me thinks I've written this before
-Richard
The outpu
Emanuele Morozzi schrieb:
You were right, now I have compiled the kernel with
"CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=y", but it's the same as before; there are not
peculiar errors, but dmraid continues not to create the devices in
/dev/mapper.
Richard Fish wrote:
This means that you do not have the device mapp
Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
> You were right, now I have compiled the kernel with
> "CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=y", but it's the same as before; there are not
> peculiar errors, but dmraid continues not to create the devices in
> /dev/mapper.
>
What does "dmsetup ls" show (after running dmraid)?
Did it creat
You were right, now I have compiled the kernel with
"CONFIG_BLK_DEV_DM=y", but it's the same as before; there are not
peculiar errors, but dmraid continues not to create the devices in
/dev/mapper.
Richard Fish wrote:
This means that you do not have the device mapper driver compiled or loaded
You're right, the device manager was compiled as module, but I thought
it was autoloaded at boot and finded no entry in
/etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6. Now I try to copile directly into
the kernel. Thanks
Richard Fish wrote:
This means that you do not have the device mapper driver compi
Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
> This is the output of "dmsetup ls":
>
> /proc/misc: No entry for device-mapper found
> Is device-mapper driver missing from kernel?
> Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver.
> Command failed
>
This means that you do not have the device mapper driver comp
This is the output of "dmsetup ls":
/proc/misc: No entry for device-mapper found
Is device-mapper driver missing from kernel?
Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver.
Command failed
No, dmraid doesnt' create the devices (2.6.11-r9 with udev); I have
tried to rerun Gentoo with th
Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
> I had this idea too, but what I have to say is that in the first
> partition is running WindowsXP. I've created the raid while installing
> MS Windows. Using "dmraid -ay" and devfs, I was able to create the
> proper devices in "/dev/mapper" , but this is no more because I
>A. Khattri wrote:
I think you need to heed my earlier advice (which was to read the RAID
HOWTO docs at tldp.org) so you understand what the different RAID levels
mean.
I've read the docs, and there's nothing new for me; I just knew the
meaning of "RAID levels".
The raid and relative partitio
I had this idea too, but what I have to say is that in the first
partition is running WindowsXP. I've created the raid while installing
MS Windows. Using "dmraid -ay" and devfs, I was able to create the
proper devices in "/dev/mapper" , but this is no more because I want
udev; since I use udev
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
> I use mdadm and I have not compiled md and raid0 as modules, but
> directly into the kernel. The problem is that while booting md doesn't
> find the raid properly.
>
> If you,re interested, this is part of the output of "fdisk -l"
>
>
Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
> I use mdadm and I have not compiled md and raid0 as modules, but
> directly into the kernel. The problem is that while booting md doesn't
> find the raid properly.
>
> If you,re interested, this is part of the output of "fdisk -l"
>
> *
A. Khattri wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
Gentoo si installed in /dev/hda.
The Raid is a striping raid composed of /dev/sda /dev/sdb and consists
of 4 partitions. I created it installing windows (work reason).
The SATA controller is a Silicon 3512.
Before, with devfs, I u
A. Khattri wrote:
>On Fri, 20 May 2005, Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
>
>
>
>>Gentoo si installed in /dev/hda.
>>The Raid is a striping raid composed of /dev/sda /dev/sdb and consists
>>of 4 partitions. I created it installing windows (work reason).
>>The SATA controller is a Silicon 3512.
>>
>>Before
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Emanuele Morozzi wrote:
> Gentoo si installed in /dev/hda.
> The Raid is a striping raid composed of /dev/sda /dev/sdb and consists
> of 4 partitions. I created it installing windows (work reason).
> The SATA controller is a Silicon 3512.
>
> Before, with devfs, I used dmraid
Hallo, I recently passed to udev, so now I cannot use my Raid.
Gentoo si installed in /dev/hda.
The Raid is a striping raid composed of /dev/sda /dev/sdb and consists
of 4 partitions. I created it installing windows (work reason).
The SATA controller is a Silicon 3512.
Before, with devfs, I used dm
34 matches
Mail list logo
