On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-09-20 6:43 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
>>
>> A couple weeks ago one of the drives died. I hot-swap replaced it with
>> a new one (with no down-time) and the rebuild took exactly 10 hours.
>>
>> Under normal operation, the speed of the array
On 2013-09-20 6:43 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
A couple weeks ago one of the drives died. I hot-swap replaced it with
a new one (with no down-time) and the rebuild took exactly 10 hours.
Under normal operation, the speed of the array for contiguous
read/writes is about 600MB/sec, which is faster th
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Being that one of the big reasons I stopped using RAID5/6 was the rebuild
> times - can be DAYS for a large array - I am very curious if anyone has
> done, or knows of anyone who has done any tests comparing rebuild times when
> using
Hi all,
Being that one of the big reasons I stopped using RAID5/6 was the
rebuild times - can be DAYS for a large array - I am very curious if
anyone has done, or knows of anyone who has done any tests comparing
rebuild times when using slow SATA, faster SAS and fastest SSD drives.
Of course
4 matches
Mail list logo
