On Monday, 1 May 2023 00:34:11 BST Alan Grimes wrote:
> There does not seem to be a gcc-config or eselect for LLVM / clang
>
> The ebuild for today's chromium requires LLVM 16 -> LLVM 16 is
> installed. Fine so far...
>
> So therefore something selects llvm 15 to build =(
> #
There does not seem to be a gcc-config or eselect for LLVM / clang
The ebuild for today's chromium requires LLVM 16 -> LLVM 16 is
installed. Fine so far...
So therefore something selects llvm 15 to build =(
#
* sys-devel/clang
Latest version available: 1
On Fri, 2023-04-28 at 11:15 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> So basically this is just a hack-layer to get around the inherent
> fact
> that linux is garbage.
I don't think shitting on Linux will attract a lot of help on this
mailing list. Nevertheless...
> Dbus is in my runlevels and shows no errors
It looks like chromium has no freakin idea how to use dbus...
A decenently good OS would provide an IPC mechanism and little else. =|
So basically this is just a hack-layer to get around the inherent fact
that linux is garbage.
Dbus is in my runlevels and shows no errors when I poke it with t
A new build of chromium came down today, no change in behavior. (High
frequency error 11's with blank config, can't even display about:blank )
It must be some kind of dependency conflict but I don't seem to have any
way to diagnose it deeper.
I will be writing these posts daily until the probl
AFAIK, chromium uses ~/settings/chromium There's a lot of stuff in
there so I don't suspect any other directories.
I ask this because even against a BLANK config directory, the damn thing
still emits crash dumps at a rate of hundreds a second, here is a
sample... =\
--
Beware of Zombies. =O
Looks like upstream noticed chromium was segfaulting so they took it off
the every few milliseconds update sechedule and tried to fix it, looks
like they added some assertion checks and shipped it out without trying
to compile it..
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-clang++ -MMD -MF obj/
On Wed, 2023-04-05 at 20:18 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Now building emptytree world again
>
> console looks like:
>
> [7268:7268:0405/201646.772380:ERROR:network_service_instance_impl.cc(
> 541)]
> Network service crashed, restarting service.
> [7268:7268:0405/201646.812949:ERROR:network_se
1. I've purged all obsolete packages from the system except for kernel
5.19 which I'm holding as a backup.
2. Everything looks like it compiles normally except for RUBY which is
utterly broken.
3. Seamonkey crashes on __ANY__ video page, esp youtube but basically
all of them, simple signal 1
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:06 PM Laurence Perkins wrote:
>
> Compile time for Chromium currently seems to run about four hours on an
> i7-9700.
Well, that does it, then. chromium-bin is good enough, I think. But of
course, the problem of obnoxious shortcuts remains...
>
Compile time for Chromium currently seems to run about four hours on an i7-9700.
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Almeida
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 2:26 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] chromium shortcuts?
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 8:19 AM Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > I don't know how to do that (I'm talking about several itens in the
> > bookmarks bar, not a single menu with several links). But I'll try a
> > clean config anyway, the bookmark issue can be dealt with later.
>
> There are import and exp
On Sun, 29 May 2022 23:10:16 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > Why not export the bookmarks then re-import them? That way you can
> > start with a clean config.
> >
> I don't know how to do that (I'm talking about several itens in the
> bookmarks bar, not a single menu with several links). But I'l
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:48 PM Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:49:21 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> > Until now, no improvement. (Note that I symlinked
> > ~/.config/chromium-bin to ~/.config/google-chrome, otherwise I would
> > lose all bookmarks. Maybe it was a bad idea?)
>
>
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:47 PM w...@op.pl wrote:
>
> New Hope! I've found this:
> https://btechgeeks.com/change-chrome-keyboard-shortcuts/
>
It seems that the "Shortcut manager" extension doesn't exist any more.
It was supposed to allow editing the "default" shortcuts, something
most pages say
On Sun, 29 May 2022 21:49:21 +0100, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> I've been using google-chrome, mainly because I assume, maybe wrongly,
> that it means less hassle regarding codecs and such. But I'm out of
> patience regarding the undocumented, uncustomizable, obnoxious,
> invasive keyboard shortcuts/mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:39:17
Jorge Almeida napisał(a):
> I suppose this means I can't simply remove the shortcuts from
> chromium... ()
>
New Hope! I've found this:
https://btechgeeks.com/change-chrome-keyboard-shortcuts/
- --
xWK
-BE
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:33 PM w...@op.pl wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:25:53
> Jorge Almeida napisał(a):
>
> > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote:
> > >
>
> Maybe take a look here:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/titl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 22:25:53
Jorge Almeida napisał(a):
> On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote:
> >
> > If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try
> > Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and fee
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:16 PM w...@op.pl wrote:
>
> If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try
> Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and feels quite like
> chromium but with many many more options (USE=widevine for netflix ;) )
>
I have no concerns regarding
If non-free software is not of any concern for you, then maybe try
Vivaldi browser? It is based on the same engine and feels quite like
chromium but with many many more options (USE=widevine for netflix ;) )
--
xWK
On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 9:56 PM w...@op.pl wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 21:49:21
> Jorge Almeida napisał(a):
>
> > So, is there a way to get rid of this, ahem, stuff? Ideally, I would
> > remove/edit some shortcuts, but I would settle f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dnia 2022-05-29, o godz. 21:49:21
Jorge Almeida napisał(a):
> So, is there a way to get rid of this, ahem, stuff? Ideally, I would
> remove/edit some shortcuts, but I would settle for trashing it all. Is
> this an unwinnable fight? (And is the dich
I've been using google-chrome, mainly because I assume, maybe wrongly,
that it means less hassle regarding codecs and such. But I'm out of
patience regarding the undocumented, uncustomizable, obnoxious,
invasive keyboard shortcuts/mouse gestures. So, I decided to try
chromium (-bin, for now), in th
Move onto the newer version and keep the earlier version number handy so
if the newer version breaks especially in the same way you have a backout.
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I have discovered that www-client/chromium-95.0.4621.4 will not
> go to any internet webpage.
>
> When
Hi. I have discovered that www-client/chromium-95.0.4621.4 will not
go to any internet webpage.
When I use it, it always says page not responsive and gives me wait or
exit buttons. Firefox works fine.I ran it in a terminal and got
all kinds of errors and my logs have a couple of seg faults.
My GLIBC situation is as follows, as you know GLIBC cannot be downgraded
once upgraded.
* sys-libs/glibc
Latest version available: 2.33
Latest version installed: 2.33
Size of files: 16,676 KiB
Homepage: https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/
Description: GNU libc
Chromium now cannot render web pages. It's throwing signal 6 abort
errors all over the place.
When I try to update it it spews all of this nonsense to the console:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy " (2017-05-21)
# (and others, updated later)
# These old versions of toolchain packages (binutils
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 17:52:05 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> My GLIBC situation is as follows, as you know GLIBC cannot be downgraded
> once upgraded.
It can, at your own risk. Read the ebuild to see how.
> * sys-libs/glibc
> Latest version available: 2.33
> Latest version installed: 2.
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:46:04 -0500, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 16:37 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > > > - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
> > > This is
Don't forget to reply to the list... I say after I forgot to change the
to address on the email I just sent.
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 16:37 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > > - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:25:31 -0500, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
>
> This is the current stable version of glibc, which would satisfy the
> ebuild. You have it masked manually,
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
This is the current stable version of glibc, which would satisfy the
ebuild. You have it masked manually, it would seem.
Did you leave yourself a comment as to why it was masked?
Hi,
since a few days Chromium is broken here. Even deleting
~/.config/chromium I get this error message immediately after Chromium
comes up.
I have tried the version 88.0.4324.150 , 89.0.4389.40 and 90.0.4412.3
What might be the reason? Am I the only one with this problem?
Thanks for a hin
On Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:29:15 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Oh for the love of god:
>
>
> * Messages for package www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70:
>
> * ERROR: www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70::gentoo failed (compile
> phase):
> * ninja -v -j16 -l0 -C out/Release v8_context_snapshot_generator
Oh for the love of god:
* Messages for package www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70:
* ERROR: www-client/chromium-78.0.3904.70::gentoo failed (compile phase):
* ninja -v -j16 -l0 -C out/Release v8_context_snapshot_generator failed
*
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 125: Called src_compi
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:12 PM John Covici wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:21:45 -0400,
> Laurence Perkins wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 05:45 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> > > Hi. I want to have Chromium on linux, but I want to build the
> > > Chrome
> > > OS version,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 13:21:45 -0400,
Laurence Perkins wrote:
>
> [1 ]
>
>
> On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 05:45 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. I want to have Chromium on linux, but I want to build the
> > Chrome
> > OS version, so I can have their version of the accessibility plugin
> > which is ca
On Sun, 2019-09-15 at 05:45 -0400, John Covici wrote:
> Hi. I want to have Chromium on linux, but I want to build the
> Chrome
> OS version, so I can have their version of the accessibility plugin
> which is called Chrom next. I did not see any use flags, so how can
> I
> do this on gentoo? I
Hi. I want to have Chromium on linux, but I want to build the Chrome
OS version, so I can have their version of the accessibility plugin
which is called Chrom next. I did not see any use flags, so how can I
do this on gentoo? I am using the unstable version of gentoo. It is
my understanding th
On Friday, 15 February 2019 09:48:34 GMT Andreas Fink wrote:
> That's because depclean sets --with-bdeps=y by default, i.e. build
> dependencies are considered to be crucial to the system. If you update
> your depclean command and add the flag --with-bdeps=n it should allow
> you to unmerge java a
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:32:15 +
Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:36:04 GMT Mick wrote:
> > On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:27:25 GMT Marc Joliet wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019, 13:12:29 CET schrieb Mick:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I just noticed chromium-72.0.
On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:36:04 GMT Mick wrote:
> On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:27:25 GMT Marc Joliet wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019, 13:12:29 CET schrieb Mick:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I just noticed chromium-72.0.3626.96 is bringing in Java packages as
> > > dependencies,
On Thursday, 14 February 2019 12:27:25 GMT Marc Joliet wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019, 13:12:29 CET schrieb Mick:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I just noticed chromium-72.0.3626.96 is bringing in Java packages as
> > dependencies, I'd rather keep off my systems. This is caused by the new
> > USE
Am Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2019, 13:12:29 CET schrieb Mick:
> Hi All,
>
> I just noticed chromium-72.0.3626.96 is bringing in Java packages as
> dependencies, I'd rather keep off my systems. This is caused by the new USE
> flag closure-compile, which I think is advertised as a good thing.
>
> Wo
Hi All,
I just noticed chromium-72.0.3626.96 is bringing in Java packages as
dependencies, I'd rather keep off my systems. This is caused by the new USE
flag closure-compile, which I think is advertised as a good thing.
Would you know if these Java dependencies are used for chromium build-time
On 3.6.2018 00:57, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2018, 13:07:11 CEST schrieb Samuraiii:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I would like to build chromium for my computers only once (USE would be
>> same across all machines).
>>
>> I run amd64, multilib on following processor types:
>>
>> Core2,
Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2018, 13:07:11 CEST schrieb Samuraiii:
> Hello list,
>
> I would like to build chromium for my computers only once (USE would be
> same across all machines).
>
> I run amd64, multilib on following processor types:
>
> Core2, Corei7, Ryzen 7 and Threadripper.
>
> What CFLAGS
Hello list,
I would like to build chromium for my computers only once (USE would be
same across all machines).
I run amd64, multilib on following processor types:
Core2, Corei7, Ryzen 7 and Threadripper.
What CFLAGS should I use for mentioned cpus?
I am possibly comfortable to build two builds
On Monday, 12 March 2018 08:27:31 GMT Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Mick wrote:
> > I can see a few warnings pilling up on different systems when trying to
> > emerge chromium-65.0.3325.146:
> >
> > warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-enum-compare-switch'; did you
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Mick wrote:
> I can see a few warnings pilling up on different systems when trying to emerge
> chromium-65.0.3325.146:
>
> warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-enum-compare-switch'; did you mean '-
> Wno-enum-compare'? [-Wunknown-warning-option]
> warning: unknow
I can see a few warnings pilling up on different systems when trying to emerge
chromium-65.0.3325.146:
warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-enum-compare-switch'; did you mean '-
Wno-enum-compare'? [-Wunknown-warning-option]
warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-tautological-unsigned-zero-compare
On Wed, Jan 31 2018, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:29 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> [snip]
>> I have two questions, one trivial, one hopefully easy.
>>
>> 1. (trivial) In your recipe did you mean "rsync", not "sync"?
>
> I sync ("emerge --sync") only one machine, and then I
On Wed, 31 Jan 2018 15:38:27 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> I sync ("emerge --sync") only one machine, and then I rsync from there
> to my other computers. After the rsync is done, you need to do "emerge
> --metadata" in the recipient machine (--sync does that for you
> automatically).
If yo
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:29 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
[snip]
> I have two questions, one trivial, one hopefully easy.
>
> 1. (trivial) In your recipe did you mean "rsync", not "sync"?
I sync ("emerge --sync") only one machine, and then I rsync from there to
my other computers. After the rsync is
On Wed, Jan 24 2018, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:11 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>>
>> I ran the build failed twice, each time with MAKEOPTS="--jobs=1" and the
>> build logs are essentially identical. After about 12 hours compiling and
>> 36MB of build.log, the error sho
On Thu, Jan 25 2018, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:29:59 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
>
>> > I have two laptops with *very* similar gentoo distributions. The
>> > newer machine had a successful build first try. The second older (4
>> > years) machine had both failures. Each
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 22:29:59 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> > I have two laptops with *very* similar gentoo distributions. The
> > newer machine had a successful build first try. The second older (4
> > years) machine had both failures. Each machine has profile
> > default/linux/amd64/17.0
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:11 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
>
> I ran the build failed twice, each time with MAKEOPTS="--jobs=1" and the
> build logs are essentially identical. After about 12 hours compiling and
> 36MB of build.log, the error shown below occurs
>
> I have two laptops with *very* simi
I ran the build failed twice, each time with MAKEOPTS="--jobs=1" and the
build logs are essentially identical. After about 12 hours compiling and
36MB of build.log, the error shown below occurs
I have two laptops with *very* similar gentoo distributions. The newer
machine had a successful build
On Friday, 8 September 2017 18:15:41 BST Todd Goodman wrote:
> Go to the menu -> More Tools -> Developer Tools, then Security tab and
> then View Certificate button
>
> Todd
Thank you Todd. It beats me why Chromium devs have made checking the contents
of a certificate more remote/obscure than i
Go to the menu -> More Tools -> Developer Tools, then Security tab and
then View Certificate button
Todd
On 09/08/2017 01:05 PM, Mick wrote:
> Either chromium has stopped displaying the content of the TLS certificate of
> a
> web site I happen to visit, or it has made it quite complicated for
Either chromium has stopped displaying the content of the TLS certificate of a
web site I happen to visit, or it has made it quite complicated for the user
to find it.
Chromium would allow the certificate to be displayed by clicking on the
'Secure' symbol on the left of the address bar. Howeve
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:
> error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
>
As stated by others, switching to GCC-5 or newer would be best.
Otherwise, try adding
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:
> note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or -std=gnu11 to
> compile your code
> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c
It looks like chromeium 60 just went stable for AMD64. Unfortunately,
it doesn't seem to build for me. I've googled the gcc error message
from the build log, and the only thing I can find is somebody claiming
it's caused by a bungled upgrade to gcc 5.x. I haven't upgrade to gcc
5.x, so that does
On Saturday 27 February 2016 08:15:47 Daniel Frey wrote:
--->8
> The brackets mean the USE flag is forced, masked or removed.
>
> (if you want to jump to the section in `man emerge` search for () using
> "/\(\)" as searching for verbose or -v shows results everywhere)
Actually, that search string
On 02/27/2016 07:18 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2016 14:58:25 I wrote:
>> On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install
www
On Saturday 27 February 2016 14:58:25 I wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install
> > > www-
> > > client/chromium without all the bloat?
On Saturday 27 February 2016 12:51:32 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www-
> > client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for
> >
> > any of these:
> >
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:35:02 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www-
> client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for
> any of these:
>
> app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher
> app-accessibility/espeak
Hello list,
I think I know the answer already, but is there any way to install www-
client/chromium without all the bloat? I don't see any need here for any of
these:
app-accessibility/speech-dispatcher
app-accessibility/espeak
media-sound/sox
media-libs/libsndfil
On 01/28/2016 06:14 PM, allan gottlieb wrote:
> Now (subsequent to the successful chromium) I did a revdep-rebuild.
> It asked to rebuild cairo. Which I let it do. I haven't done a
> revdep-rebuild for many month (over a year?) and must confess I thought
> they were no longer needed.
I always ru
On Thu, Jan 28 2016, allan gottlieb wrote:
> Just now chromium will not start
>
> gottlieb@E7450 /local/allan/gottlieb $ chromium-browser
> [1318:1338:0128/133753:ERROR:nss_util.cc(839)] After loading Root
> Certs, loaded==false: NSS error code: -8018
>
> I am running stable gentoo,
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:41:16 -0500, allan gottlieb wrote:
> Just now chromium will not start
>
> gottlieb@E7450 /local/allan/gottlieb $ chromium-browser
> [1318:1338:0128/133753:ERROR:nss_util.cc(839)] After loading Root
> Certs, loaded==false: NSS error code: -8018
>
> I am runnin
What arch?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:36 PM allan gottlieb wrote:
> Just now chromium will not start
>
> gottlieb@E7450 /local/allan/gottlieb $ chromium-browser
> [1318:1338:0128/133753:ERROR:nss_util.cc(839)] After loading Root
> Certs, loaded==false: NSS error code: -8018
>
> I am
Just now chromium will not start
gottlieb@E7450 /local/allan/gottlieb $ chromium-browser
[1318:1338:0128/133753:ERROR:nss_util.cc(839)] After loading Root
Certs, loaded==false: NSS error code: -8018
I am running stable gentoo, gnome, systemd
thanks in advance for any tips.
allan
Version 36.0.1985.125 (283153) shows many pages with non-antialiased fonts and
does my eyes in - see attached screen shot. Zooming in makes it worse.
Any ideas how I can fix this?
This is its flags:
Installed versions: 36.0.1985.125(11:42:35 07/19/14)(cups pulseaudio
tcmalloc -bindist -
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Mick wrote:
> Thanks Mike, I didn't know about ppapi - or that this is available as a
> separate package. Shouldn't it be drawn in as dependency by Chromium, or
> at
> least done so by some USE flag?
>
www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins will get you chrome-style
On Saturday 24 May 2014 15:02:36 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On May 24, 2014 5:43 AM, "Mick" wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I run chromium-35.0.1916.114-r1 and noticed that only the 'Chromoting
>
> Viewer'
>
> > plugin is listed under chromium://plugins. The other plugins must be
>
> there
>
> > becau
On May 24, 2014 5:43 AM, "Mick" wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I run chromium-35.0.1916.114-r1 and noticed that only the 'Chromoting
Viewer'
> plugin is listed under chromium://plugins. The other plugins must be
there
> because they are being launched and run - e.g. adobe flash. Although
> interestingly
Took me a while because i don't use Chromium on that computer much so i lost
track of the issue.
The problem seems to have been that python was built with /dev/shm mounted with
mode 0755.
updated the mode to 1777 (tmp-style) and recompiled python
chromium now compiles fine.
not sure if that pro
On 11/22/2013 07:31 PM, Alecks Gates wrote:
>
> What kernel are you running and/or what kernel did you build python2.7
> with? I would try remerging dev-lang/python:2.7
>
> Possibly relevant:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue8326
>
I ran python-updater like Walt suggested, no help.
Then I rebuil
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:19 PM, james N. wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> I have a build issue with chromium on one machine but not the other.
> The version I'm trying to build is www-client/chromium-32.0.1700.19
> but the problem occurs on the current stable version also (31.0.1650.57).
>
>
> * ERROR: ww
On Saturday 23 November 2013 00:30:45 Yohan Pereira wrote:
> I think your looking for
> * www-plugins/chrome-binary-plugins
> Last time I tried it, it didn't work very well. Would keep getting
> unsupported version of flash etc.
Thanks, I installed the flash part from it chrome-binary-plugins.
It'
On 22/11/13 at 10:24pm, Pavel Volkov wrote:
> News here:
> http://blog.chromium.org/2013/09/saying-goodbye-to-our-old-friend-npapi.html
>
> And the previous one:
> http://blog.chromium.org/2012/08/the-road-to-safer-more-stable-and.html
>
> Currently chromium <---> adobe-flash communication in Gen
News here:
http://blog.chromium.org/2013/09/saying-goodbye-to-our-old-friend-npapi.html
And the previous one:
http://blog.chromium.org/2012/08/the-road-to-safer-more-stable-and.html
Currently chromium <---> adobe-flash communication in Gentoo works through
NPAPI and I don't see the bundled Flash
Hey list,
I have a build issue with chromium on one machine but not the other.
The version I'm trying to build is www-client/chromium-32.0.1700.19
but the problem occurs on the current stable version also (31.0.1650.57).
* ERROR: www-client/chromium-32.0.1700.19::gentoo failed (configure phase)
On Tuesday 30 Jul 2013 09:11:37 Pavel Volkov wrote:
> I have 2 questions about how Chromium operates with a clean profile.
> I run it like this:
> % chromium --user-data-dir=
>
> Directory is empty (at first launch).
>
> After the first launch, some entries immediately appear in History. I
> vis
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Pavel Volkov wrote:
> I have 2 questions about how Chromium operates with a clean profile.
> I run it like this:
> % chromium --user-data-dir=
>
> Directory is empty (at first launch).
>
> After the first launch, some entries immediately appear in History. I
> vis
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Yohan Pereira wrote:
> Just a hunch but have you signed into Chromium with your google account
> ? Google has this feature/anti-feature (based on your outlook) where it
> syncs bookmarks, history among other things with their servers so you have
> access to it on
On 30/07/13 at 12:11pm, Pavel Volkov wrote:
> I have 2 questions about how Chromium operates with a clean profile.
> I run it like this:
> % chromium --user-data-dir=
>
> Directory is empty (at first launch).
>
> After the first launch, some entries immediately appear in History. I
> visited tho
I have 2 questions about how Chromium operates with a clean profile.
I run it like this:
% chromium --user-data-dir=
Directory is empty (at first launch).
After the first launch, some entries immediately appear in History. I
visited those before, but it's not everything I visited. Approximately
Just try, and chromium get crazy too.
I'm using chromium 24.0.1312.5 with KDE by the way.
2012/11/11 Grant
> Does anyone else's chromium get a little crazy when they try to bring up
> the print dialog without a printer attached?
>
> - Grant
>
Does anyone else's chromium get a little crazy when they try to bring up
the print dialog without a printer attached?
- Grant
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:31 AM, András Csányi wrote:
> On 2 September 2011 10:17, JD Horelick wrote:
> >
> > Also, one is a binary, one is source that you need to compile. And
> > Chromium is an EXTREMELY long compile
>
> I agree it takes long time (1-2 hours on my machine) but the compile
>
On 2 September 2011 10:17, JD Horelick wrote:
>
> Also, one is a binary, one is source that you need to compile. And
> Chromium is an EXTREMELY long compile
I agree it takes long time (1-2 hours on my machine) but the compile
time doesn't matter for me. I upgrade my machine from my workplace.
On 2 September 2011 09:45, Yohan Pereira wrote:
>
>
> This is from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_chrome
>
> Chromium implements a similar feature set as Chrome, but lacks built-in
> automatic updates, built-in PDF reader and Google branding, and most
> noticeably has a blue-colored logo in p
On 2 September 2011 03:45, Yohan Pereira wrote:
> On Friday 02 Sep 2011 09:27:09 András Csányi wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>
>>
>
>> In the morning after I have synced my portage I saw there is a
>
>> google-chrome and chromium package. The version numbers are the same.
>
>> I watched the websites and b
On Friday 02 Sep 2011 09:27:09 András Csányi wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> In the morning after I have synced my portage I saw there is a
> google-chrome and chromium package. The version numbers are the same.
> I watched the websites and basically they are the same. Google Chrome
> is the Chrome browser
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
