Richard Fish wrote:
This means that /usr/bin/as is a broken symlink, since -L is the
dereference option. But binutils-config should fix that...
...unless glibc is broken in which case nothing will work...
I have a suspicion that changing the ntpl/ntplonly use flags at the
same time as changing
On 12/2/06, Randy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # ls -L /usr/bin/as
# ls -L /usr/bin/as
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/as: No such file or directory
The bizarre thing is that I can use the tab completion to see that there
is an entry for /usr/bin/as there...
This means that /usr/bin/as is a
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> Do you use ccache, distcc or any other wrappers? If you do you may have to
> disable it until this is all resolved and the wrappers have been remerged.
I had tried to set both of those up at one point, so they were still
installed on my machine, but they were not enabl
On Friday 01 December 2006 23:39, Randy Barlow wrote:
[SNIP]
> binutils seemed to have merged correctly, but the configure script for
> gcc seems to be having issues. The last few lines of output show:
>
> checking whether the C compiler (gcc -mtune=i686 -pipe -march=pentium3
> -O2 ) works... no
>
Richard Fish wrote:
> er, I meant "env-update && source /etc/profile".
Hrm... env-update && source /etc/profile didn't seem to do the trick.
Actually, I still can't call the compiler by hand when I do this (I can
if I set the PATH variable to include the things from binutils, but that
doesn't seem
On 12/1/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/1/06, Randy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So my compiler is broke. Any pointers on how to fix this?
>
> One thing I just thought of is that I could add the executables
> installed by binutils to my $PATH so that it can find them t
On 12/1/06, Randy Barlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So my compiler is broke. Any pointers on how to fix this?
One thing I just thought of is that I could add the executables
installed by binutils to my $PATH so that it can find them to build the
new compiler - perhaps that will work?
"etc-u
Randy Barlow wrote:
> So I am trying to bring my CHOST from i386-pc-linux-gnu to
> i686-pc-linux-gnu by following the guide at
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml. Well so far things
> aren't working out so well. The first step is to change the CHOST
> variable. I also went ahead and
So I am trying to bring my CHOST from i386-pc-linux-gnu to
i686-pc-linux-gnu by following the guide at
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml. Well so far things
aren't working out so well. The first step is to change the CHOST
variable. I also went ahead and added nptl and nptlonly to my
9 matches
Mail list logo
