Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-20 Thread A. Khattri
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Jakob wrote: > > Its funny till yesterday I didnt even know It supports 64bit ;-) Any Pentium D (or higher) CPU supports 64bit. > for now I will stick with 32bit, I think I will Install 64bit to > another partition in some weeks The other option is to have a pure 64bit syst

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-20 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 07:43, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > Is there a tool to query a portage to get a list of all packages which > have 'testing' or 'stable' status for x86 and have 'not available' or > 'hard masked' status for amd64? sys-apps/paludis 0.12 with the ruby USE flag enabled contai

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
Is there a tool to query a portage to get a list of all packages which have 'testing' or 'stable' status for x86 and have 'not available' or 'hard masked' status for amd64? === On Wednesday 20 December 2006 01:38, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: === ... > Is it smart to hope "Gentoo AMD64 F

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 18:56, "W.Kenworthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > Is it still the case thats its impossible to upgrade a 32bit gentoo on > athlon64 to 64 bit - requires a full reinstall? Reinstall is the

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread W.Kenworthy
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 21:58 +0100, Jakob wrote: > On 12/19/06, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ... > for now I will stick with 32bit, I think I will Install 6

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Jakob
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:46, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > What is your "strategical vision" to this (use C2D as 32-bit or > 64-bit)

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:46, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > What is your "strategical vision" to this (use C2D as 32-bit or > 64-bit) alternatives? All (well, very nearly all) the software I need

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:56, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > do I have to run emerge -avuD world after changing to -march=prescott? No, that's not required. -- "If there's one thing we've established over

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Jakob
On 12/19/06, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > > Thaks for the quick reply. &

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Jakob
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > Thaks for the quick reply. > On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use: &

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
What is your "strategical vision" to this (use C2D as 32-bit or 64-bit) alternatives? Is it smart to hope "Gentoo AMD64 FAQ" will be thiner and thiner during upcoming months? :-) === On Tuesday 19 December 2006 23:13, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: === ... Of course, it's getting harder a

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:48, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > Thaks for the quick reply. > On http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags they say for 32bit use: > CFLAGS="-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Jakob
On 12/19/06, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:18, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the > GentooWeeklyNewsletter t

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 13:18, Jakob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about '[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo': > I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the > GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use "-march=nocona (and an amd64 profile) for > Core 2 Solo/D

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS Core2Duo

2006-12-19 Thread Jakob
Hi all, I have a Core2Duo T5600 1,83 MHz in my notebook. Today I read on the GentooWeeklyNewsletter to use "-march=nocona (and an amd64 profile) for Core 2 Solo/Duo" Currently I'm using: CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium-m -pipe" CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" MAKEOPTS="-j3" and /usr/po