Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

2024-09-10 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 9/9/24 8:50 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 21:33 -0300, João Matos wrote: >> Dear list, >> >> I'm trying to install the Checkpoint client for linux (cshell_install). It >> requires sys-libs/libstdc++-v3, 32 bits. I couldn't compile it and found >> this bug: https://bugs.gent

Fwd: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

2024-09-10 Thread Alexe Stefan
Resending from a different email, as I got an error sending on my main email. -- Forwarded message - De la: stefan1 Date: mar., 10 sept. 2024, 15:13 Subject: Fwd: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4 To: Stefanalexe48 Original Message

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

2024-09-09 Thread Filip Kobierski
> TIL that we have a twenty-year-old libstdc++ in the tree. Maybe we should mask it? It is supossed to work with gcc <3.4 and the oldest we have is 8.5.0, which is masked already. Original Message On 9/10/24 02:50, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 21:33 -030

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

2024-09-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Mon, 2024-09-09 at 21:33 -0300, João Matos wrote: > Dear list, > > I'm trying to install the Checkpoint client for linux (cshell_install). It > requires sys-libs/libstdc++-v3, 32 bits. I couldn't compile it and found > this bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/919184 TIL that we have a twenty-year-old

[gentoo-user] Bug 919184 - sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.6-r4

2024-09-09 Thread João Matos
Dear list, I'm trying to install the Checkpoint client for linux (cshell_install). It requires sys-libs/libstdc++-v3, 32 bits. I couldn't compile it and found this bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/919184 Do you know any way of work around this? Maybe copying the binary file from another distro or try

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-13 Thread Wols Lists
On 13/12/2021 22:03, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: If they are involved multiple times with the default options I think any attempt to scrub something that is already being scrubbed is just a no-op. Obviously if you don't want all that IO during the day you'll have to do something more clever - you

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-13 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:54:30PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:42 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:38 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > > > Well I *could* disable run-crons altogether and add entries to fcron’s own > > > crontab which w

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-13 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 4:42 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:38 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > Well I *could* disable run-crons altogether and add entries to fcron’s own > > crontab which would run those scripts in /etc/cron.{hourly,daily,...} > > instead. > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-13 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:38 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Well I *could* disable run-crons altogether and add entries to fcron’s own > crontab which would run those scripts in /etc/cron.{hourly,daily,...} > instead. > > However, I like predictable times at which those jobs will run. Especi

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-13 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 04:33:32PM -0500 schrieb Michael Orlitzky: > On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > For the record: The checks in run-crons that I referred to earlier are > > actually more for those cases in which the machine was powered off for a > > while in

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-13 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Mon, 2021-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > For the record: The checks in run-crons that I referred to earlier are > actually more for those cases in which the machine was powered off for a > while in order to restore cron completeness as early as possible after boot. > The

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-13 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:18:44PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 2:07 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > Am Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:41:33PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 1:21 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I don't use this, b

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-13 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 2:07 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Am Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:41:33PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 1:21 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > > > > I don't use this, but I believe there should be an hourly crontab > > entry that deletes the cro

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-12 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:41:33PM -0500 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 1:21 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > It uses state files in /var/spool/cron/lastrun/ to know when each interval > > was last run, so it only runs once per period. But: the age threshold for > > the state

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 1:21 PM Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > It uses state files in /var/spool/cron/lastrun/ to know when each interval > was last run, so it only runs once per period. But: the age threshold for > the state file is period + 5 minutes. Shouldn’t that be period - 5 minutes? > > My

[gentoo-user] Bug in run-crons?

2021-12-12 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Hi, it’s me again, :) I’m currently improving the cron setup on my Gentoo-powered NAS. I installed zfs-auto-snapshot, which includes scripts for hourly, daily, weekly and monthly creation of snapshots. The NAS uses fcron for its cron daemon. In order for the scripts to work, I enabled the run-cro

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

2020-05-06 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 5/5/20 9:59 PM, akater wrote: > Michael Orlitzky writes: > >> www-client/pybugz > > I have that one installed, actually! But I'd rather use it through > Elisp interface... which I'm likely to write if nobody else does but > it's unlikely to happen in the upcoming months. And I'm concerned o

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

2020-05-05 Thread akater
Michael Orlitzky writes: > www-client/pybugz I have that one installed, actually! But I'd rather use it through Elisp interface... which I'm likely to write if nobody else does but it's unlikely to happen in the upcoming months. And I'm concerned of being banned during prototyping. signature

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

2020-05-05 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 5/5/20 5:43 PM, tastytea wrote: > >> If there's an Emacs-friendly way to post bugs, I'd be glad to know: >> there are ≈6 bugs and patches waiting in my queue. > > I searched a few weeks ago but couldn't find anything. :-( > www-client/pybugz

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

2020-05-05 Thread tastytea
On 2020-05-05T15:15+ akater wrote: > tastytea writes: > > > Same here. You should report it to > > . > > Thanks for checking. I'm sorry but the only way I could post to > bugzilla now is from a web browser—which is very unpleasant on

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

2020-05-05 Thread akater
tastytea writes: > Same here. You should report it to > . Thanks for checking. I'm sorry but the only way I could post to bugzilla now is from a web browser—which is very unpleasant on its own, and on top of that I only have graphical browser

Re: [gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

2020-05-05 Thread tastytea
On 2020-05-05T12:03+ akater wrote: > I can't fetch sys-libs/uclibc-ng-1.0.33 from distfiles.gentoo.org > (404), and the file fetched from downloads-uclibc-ng.org has a hash > different from that in Manifest. Thus, uclibc-ng-1.0.33 can't be > installed, and I guess it's a bug. Same here. You

[gentoo-user] [bug] uClibc-ng-1.0.33 won't fetch

2020-05-05 Thread akater
I can't fetch sys-libs/uclibc-ng-1.0.33 from distfiles.gentoo.org (404), and the file fetched from downloads-uclibc-ng.org has a hash different from that in Manifest. Thus, uclibc-ng-1.0.33 can't be installed, and I guess it's a bug. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG : kernel 4.5.1 and ALSA

2016-04-21 Thread Yuri K. Shatroff
21.04.2016 11:28, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote: Hi gentoo-users, A few days ago I updated linux kernel to 4.5.1. Yesterday I got a disk space overflow in my /home partition. Cleaned it up and rebooted, just to run into the same issue today m

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG : kernel 4.5.1 and ALSA

2016-04-21 Thread Alexander Kapshuk
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote: > Hi gentoo-users, > > A few days ago I updated linux kernel to 4.5.1. Yesterday I got a disk space > overflow in my /home partition. Cleaned it up and rebooted, just to run into > the same issue today morning. Investigations revealed that

[gentoo-user] BUG : kernel 4.5.1 and ALSA

2016-04-21 Thread Yuri K. Shatroff
Hi gentoo-users, A few days ago I updated linux kernel to 4.5.1. Yesterday I got a disk space overflow in my /home partition. Cleaned it up and rebooted, just to run into the same issue today morning. Investigations revealed that the `.xsessions-errors` had grown to tremendous 100G full of mes

[gentoo-user] Bug-reporting best practice? Xen/Gentoo -- Preparing to log interrupt info sometime after feb. 2016.

2015-11-25 Thread Håkon Alstadheim
Hi all, I'm not a developer but I would like to set up my Xen system to get bug reports as useful as possible. At present I am logging the xen console via serial port, and I am running Xen compiled from gentoo ebuild with "debug" use flag. Is there anything more I need to set up to be able to colle

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey? SOLVED!!

2013-02-21 Thread Elias Diem
Hello there Just for the record: I was able to solve the problem!! I created a separate environment file in /etc/portage/env. The content of this file is: -8<--- CFLAGS="-pipe " CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} " MAKEOPTS="-j1 " -8<--- The CFLAGS n

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

2013-02-11 Thread Elias Diem
On 2013-02-12, Elias Diem wrote: > `Illegal statement' in the build.log. The above should read `Illegal instruction'. -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

2013-02-11 Thread Elias Diem
Hi there Well I did reinstall my whole system but without luck. Emerging gnome-light showed the very same error when compiling spidermonkey. Then I thought I will install awesome, because it does not need spidermonkey. But the same problem here when compiling awesome. `Illegal statement' in t

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

2013-02-08 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Friday 08 February 2013 07:46:16 PM IST, Elias Diem wrote: > On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > >> Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? > > Actually I can compile version 1.7.0 > > But: When I want to update world, it needs (I think) version > 1.8.5-r1 > Try adding =dev-lang

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

2013-02-08 Thread Elias Diem
On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? Actually I can compile version 1.7.0 But: When I want to update world, it needs (I think) version 1.8.5-r1 -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

2013-02-07 Thread Elias Diem
Hi Nilesh On 2013-02-07, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? I'm about to try. I will report back. -- Greetings Elias

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

2013-02-07 Thread Nilesh Govindrajan
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Elias Diem wrote: > Hello all > > I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey. > > The output from build.log is attached. > > If you need more info, please tell me so. > > Thanks. > Seems like one. Try compiling an older version? -- Nilesh Govindrajan http

[gentoo-user] Bug in spidermonkey?

2013-02-07 Thread Elias Diem
Hello all I'm encountering a bug when emerging spidermonkey. The output from build.log is attached. If you need more info, please tell me so. Thanks. -- Greetings Elias  * Package:dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5-r1  * Repository: gentoo  * [39;

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 290437 (gcc-config)

2011-09-22 Thread Jonas de Buhr
>Hmm, odd. I thought everyone used to be able to reopen bugs. Ooops. i assumed the opposite because several people complained about having the same bug after it was closed in the comments but did not reopen it. But in fact i did not try. Shame on me :) >Well, it looks like mailto:vap...@gentoo.or

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 290437 (gcc-config)

2011-09-22 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 22.09.2011 12:22, schrieb Jonas de Buhr: > Hi guys, > > i just ran into this bug again: > > sys-devel/gcc-config suggests gcc re-merge when profile is invalid > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290437 > > which is in status RESOLVED FIXED which is clearly not the case. > > who can ch

[gentoo-user] Bug 290437 (gcc-config)

2011-09-22 Thread Jonas de Buhr
Hi guys, i just ran into this bug again: sys-devel/gcc-config suggests gcc re-merge when profile is invalid https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290437 which is in status RESOLVED FIXED which is clearly not the case. who can change the status of a bug? /jonas

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

2011-02-01 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 13:02:46 Adam Carter wrote: > Volker - do you have CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU set? (X) Tree-based hierarchical RCU RCU Implementation (Tree-based hierarchical RCU) ---> │ │ │ │[ ] Enable tracing for RCU

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

2011-01-31 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sunday 30 January 2011 18:08:50 Mark Knecht wrote: > None the less it seems like the message suggests that the driver is > coded incorrectly. more likely the gentoo-sources patchset is broken.

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

2011-01-30 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Adam Carter wrote: > I use gentoo-sources and have been getting that for as long as i've used > fglrx (since 9.6, ie driver version 8.62). I don't notice any issue so just > ignore it. > Thanks Adam! I guess it's been there for the last week (when I gave up on the

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

2011-01-30 Thread Mark Knecht
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Sunday 30 January 2011 12:40:29 Mark Knecht wrote: >> Hi, >>    I haven't used the closed source ATI driver for long but I don't >> remember seeing this dmesg error before. It's not high priority for me >> as I'll be switching out t

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

2011-01-30 Thread Adam Carter
I use gentoo-sources and have been getting that for as long as i've used fglrx (since 9.6, ie driver version 8.62). I don't notice any issue so just ignore it.

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

2011-01-30 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Sunday 30 January 2011 12:40:29 Mark Knecht wrote: > Hi, >I haven't used the closed source ATI driver for long but I don't > remember seeing this dmesg error before. It's not high priority for me > as I'll be switching out the graphics card to an NVidia card hopefully > tomorrow, but is this

[gentoo-user] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: X/4018

2011-01-30 Thread Mark Knecht
Hi, I haven't used the closed source ATI driver for long but I don't remember seeing this dmesg error before. It's not high priority for me as I'll be switching out the graphics card to an NVidia card hopefully tomorrow, but is this something that should get reported somewhere, or is it just the

[gentoo-user] Bug 291488, Binutils. Workaround?

2010-08-24 Thread Al
OK, this is a Prefix related bug, but I don't want to bother the small team, with every question of a gentoo beginner. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=291488 Binutils tries to build a 64 bit module on a 32 bit machine: archive64 something. They write I have to remove the -L/usr/sfw/lib/64

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug about possibly incomplete bugfix

2010-07-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 10 July 2010 19:21:28 Nuno J. Silva wrote: > (I asked this on IRC more than an hour ago, got no reply, so here goes > it to the list.) > > What's the policy when you think that a change made due to a FIXED bug > needs more changes? Should you just comment it, fill another bug or > chan

[gentoo-user] Bug about possibly incomplete bugfix

2010-07-10 Thread Nuno J. Silva
(I asked this on IRC more than an hour ago, got no reply, so here goes it to the list.) What's the policy when you think that a change made due to a FIXED bug needs more changes? Should you just comment it, fill another bug or change the state (I can't do the later, anyway)? As an example (the on

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-19 Thread Dale
. Does kde also use this function to change its time and date? Where would one find the source package for 'date'? Dan --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Dale wrote: From: Dale Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 12:12 PM dan blum

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-19 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:14 PM, dan blum wrote: > I see 'date' is a binary file. Does kde also use this function to change its > time and date? Where would one find the source package for 'date'? $ equery b `which date` * Searching for /usr/bin/date ... sys-apps/coreutils-8.4 (/bin/date) (if

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-19 Thread dan blum
o use this function to change its time and date? Where would one find the source package for 'date'? Dan --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Dale wrote: > From: Dale > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 12:12 PM >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-19 Thread KH
Am 19.04.2010 00:41, schrieb dan blum: Dale, Thanks for following up. HOw do you start a new thread? It is slightly annoying when you change a setting and reverts back to the original; the whole (computer) system should be more user friendly. Either way, it is good that there is an "easy" fix

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-18 Thread Dale
dan blum wrote: Dale, Thanks for following up. HOw do you start a new thread? It is slightly annoying when you change a setting and reverts back to the original; the whole (computer) system should be more user friendly. Either way, it is good that there is an "easy" fix, which I will do. I w

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-18 Thread dan blum
have much more complex issues to discuss shortly. Thanks. --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Dale wrote: > From: Dale > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Bug > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 12:12 PM > dan blum wrote: > > I run KDE on my system and my clock

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-14 Thread Dale
dan blum wrote: I run KDE on my system and my clock is wrong. I corrected several times from KDE, which sets the time to next boot, when it reverts to the old setting. This looks like slight bug. Since mailing list users generally use threaded messages, please start a new message instead

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-14 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:46 AM, dan blum wrote: > I run KDE on my system and my clock is wrong. I corrected several times from > KDE, which sets the time to next boot, when it reverts to the old setting. > This looks like slight bug. Check this option in your file /etc/conf.d/hwclock # If yo

[gentoo-user] Bug

2010-04-14 Thread dan blum
I run KDE on my system and my clock is wrong. I corrected several times from KDE, which sets the time to next boot, when it reverts to the old setting. This looks like slight bug. --- On Wed, 4/14/10, Dale wrote: > From: Dale > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can't get a DVD to burn. > To: gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 246672 ATI-DRIVERS

2008-11-26 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Mittwoch 26 November 2008, James wrote: > I've got an ati/amd64 system that no matter what combo > of xorg-server, xorg-x11 and ati-drivers, I cannot get > it to work. > > lspci shows: > 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc > RD580 [CrossFire Xpress 3200] > Chipset > Host Bridge > 00:02.0 P

[gentoo-user] Bug 246672 ATI-DRIVERS

2008-11-26 Thread James
I've got an ati/amd64 system that no matter what combo of xorg-server, xorg-x11 and ati-drivers, I cannot get it to work. lspci shows: 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RD580 [CrossFire Xpress 3200] Chipset Host Bridge 00:02.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 PCI-X Root Port 00:0

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 246672 ATI-DRIVERS

2008-11-25 Thread Rodolphe Rocca
James wrote: > Hello, > > One of my (ati) systems has been screwed up a few days now because of > bug 246672. > > Long story short, I have no ati-drivers installed and when I try to > emerge it, I get: > > Cannot write to '/usr/lib32/opengl/ati/extensions' > Please check permissions and director

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug 246672 ATI-DRIVERS

2008-11-25 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 25 November 2008, James wrote: > Hello, > > One of my (ati) systems has been screwed up a few days now because of > bug 246672. > > Long story short, I have no ati-drivers installed and when I try to > emerge it, I get: > > Cannot write to '/usr/lib32/opengl/ati/extensions' > Please che

[gentoo-user] Bug 246672 ATI-DRIVERS

2008-11-25 Thread James
Hello, One of my (ati) systems has been screwed up a few days now because of bug 246672. Long story short, I have no ati-drivers installed and when I try to emerge it, I get: Cannot write to '/usr/lib32/opengl/ati/extensions' Please check permissions and directories for broken symlinks Obviou

[gentoo-user] Bug in JAVA SDK ebuilds?

2008-10-16 Thread Wolfgang Liebich
Hi, I'm a java developer. Therefor my gentoo box contains different JDK versions, even from different vendors, for doing tests against specific JDKs. I've still installed JDK 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6 from Sun and IBM. I'm also using idlj for generating CORBA stubs, and when I wrote a build script to be us

[gentoo-user] BUG?: gentoo-ppc unable to start init scrpt keymap.

2008-10-09 Thread Wang, Baojun
error message: * Loading key mappings ... * /bin/loadkeys not found [ !! ] * ERROR: cannot start consolefont as keymaps could not start it's very strange gentoo-ppc install kbd to /usr/bin/loadkeys instead of /bin/loadkeys, which leads the above error. localhost ~ # emerge --info Portage 2

[gentoo-user] Bug in rarian-sk-get-cl ?

2008-08-02 Thread alain . didierjean
logwatch returns daily this message: WARNING: Segmentation Faults in these executables rarian-sk-get-c : 1 Time(s) What's this command for ? Who's calling it for me ? Is this a known bug, or just local ? Thx for the help -- ~adj~

[gentoo-user] Bug in server_test.c

2008-03-24 Thread Grant Edwards
There appears to be a bug in server_test.c: ecos-opt/net/net/common/current/tests/server_test.c 94 95 #ifdef CYGPKG_LIBC_STDIO 96 sprintf(buf, "Hello %s:%d\n", inet_ntoa(client_addr.sin_addr), ntohs(client_addr.sin_port)); 97 #else 98 str

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in /etc/init.d/netmount?

2007-10-07 Thread Matthias Fechner
Hi Dan, Dan Farrell wrote: > AFAIK you are correct, this is a bug in a few of the initscripts that > don't behave sensibly if the root fs is network mounted. thx for your answer a raised a bug report with the number: 194967. Bye Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software eng

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in /etc/init.d/netmount?

2007-10-05 Thread Dan Farrell
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:33:02 +0200 Matthias Fechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have here a gentoo diskless system which boots over pxeboot and > mount everything over NFS from my big Gentoo server. > > But at shutdown I get the error message: > Failed to simply unmount filesystems >

[gentoo-user] Bug in /etc/init.d/netmount?

2007-10-05 Thread Matthias Fechner
Hi, I have here a gentoo diskless system which boots over pxeboot and mount everything over NFS from my big Gentoo server. But at shutdown I get the error message: Failed to simply unmount filesystems Unmounting network filesystems (retry #1) ... INIT: no more processes left in this runlevel A

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in bash ?

2007-04-21 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 21 April 2007 09:52:40 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can somebody explain why > ls [A-Z]* > works as ls * (or ls -R): > It seems that [A-Z] is ignored by bash-3.1.17 on amd64. > The expression works as expected with zsh... Try `ls [[:upper:]]*`. Also -R is recursive. You should google tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in bash ?

2007-04-21 Thread Renat Golubchyk
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:44:09 +0200 Jan Seeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is no bug. Bash globs everything that begins with A-Z (also > directories) and then gives that list to ls. So ls lists all these > files and the directories that begin with A-Z. Strangely though, bash > seems to ignore

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in bash ?

2007-04-21 Thread Jan Seeger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is no bug. Bash globs everything that begins with A-Z (also directories) and then gives that list to ls. So ls lists all these files and the directories that begin with A-Z. Strangely though, bash seems to ignore case. (When I try your command, ls

[gentoo-user] Bug in bash ?

2007-04-21 Thread alain . didierjean
Can somebody explain why ls [A-Z]* works as ls * (or ls -R): It seems that [A-Z] is ignored by bash-3.1.17 on amd64. The expression works as expected with zsh... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in usermod, full name of options doesn't work

2007-01-13 Thread Allan Gottlieb
At Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:13:18 +0100 Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> Goal: add gottlieb to group scanner. >> >> It seems that -aG works but --append --groups doesn't > > Please try attached patch. > I'll report this bug upstream, mentioning that you found it.

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in usermod, full name of options doesn't work

2007-01-13 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Goal: add gottlieb to group scanner. > > It seems that -aG works but --append --groups doesn't Please try attached patch. I'll report this bug upstream, mentioning that you found it. Benno diff -ur cvs-shadow/src/usermod.c shadow/src/usermod.c --- cvs-shadow/src/usermod.c

Re: [gentoo-user] bug in usermod, full name of options doesn't work

2007-01-12 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 12 January 2007 18:46, Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Goal: add gottlieb to group scanner. > > It seems that -aG works but --append --groups doesn't > > I will file a bug in b.g.o. unless I did something wrong. I wouldn't be surprised if it would be RESOLVED UPSTREAM. Guess there's only one wa

[gentoo-user] bug in usermod, full name of options doesn't work

2007-01-12 Thread Allan Gottlieb
Goal: add gottlieb to group scanner. It seems that -aG works but --append --groups doesn't I will file a bug in b.g.o. unless I did something wrong. thanks in advance allan ajglap portage # usermod --groups scanner --append gottlieb Usage: usermod [options] LOGIN Options: -a, --append

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 does not compile

2006-09-13 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:04:40 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: > After menuconfig > make > terminates due to a shell syntax error. > Are the gentoo kernel patches buggy? Who knows? Maybe if the error message wasn't considered Top Secret, someone would be able to shed some light on the cause.

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 does not compile

2006-09-13 Thread Iain Buchanan
> After menuconfig > make > terminates due to a shell syntax error. > Are the gentoo kernel patches buggy? > > Many thanks for hint, hint: posting an exact copy of the output from your terminal would probably get you more help ;) -- Iain Buchanan Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? -- gent

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 does not compile

2006-09-13 Thread Jean-Marc Beaune
Hi,   I don't know if it's relevant but as the installation guide says, I do 'make && make modules_install'. Otherwise you could try to use genkernel, just to see if kernel sources are corrupted.  On 9/13/06, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,gentoo doesn't seem to like me.Trying to ins

[gentoo-user] BUG 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 does not compile

2006-09-13 Thread Helmut Jarausch
Hi, gentoo doesn't seem to like me. Trying to install gentoo, I did USE="-doc symlink" emerge gentoo-sources After menuconfig make terminates due to a shell syntax error. Are the gentoo kernel patches buggy? Many thanks for hint, Helmut Jarausch Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik RWTH - Aac

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug report.

2005-12-20 Thread Allan Spagnol Comar
thanks All On 12/20/05, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: > > >Where Do I do a bug report > > > >I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. > > > > > Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package > > > >name to an ebuild. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug report.

2005-12-20 Thread Dale
Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: Where Do I do a bug report I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an ebuild. !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8) don´t know where to post it --

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug report.

2005-12-20 Thread Paul Varner
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 15:22 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: > Where Do I do a bug report > > I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. > >>> Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package > name to an ebuild. > !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug report.

2005-12-20 Thread Paul Varner
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 15:22 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote: > Where Do I do a bug report > > I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. > >>> Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package > name to an ebuild. > !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8

[gentoo-user] Bug report.

2005-12-20 Thread Allan Spagnol Comar
Where Do I do a bug report I received this a moment ago when I run emerge --sync. >>> Updating Portage cache: 88%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to an ebuild. !!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/x11-6.8) don´t know where to post it -- An application asked: "Requeires Windows

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug in net.eth0?

2005-11-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:01:29 -0800, Hareesh Nagarajan wrote: > Version: # $Header: > /home/cvsroot/gentoo-src/rc-scripts/init.d/net.eth0,v 1.41 2004/05/10 > 14:16:35 agriffis Exp $ This looks like a very old script. /etc/init.d/net.eth0 should now be a symlink to net.lo. -- Neil Bothwick Pres

[gentoo-user] Bug in net.eth0?

2005-11-17 Thread Hareesh Nagarajan
Hi, Some verison info: Version: # $Header: /home/cvsroot/gentoo-src/rc-scripts/init.d/net.eth0,v 1.41 2004/05/10 14:16:35 agriffis Exp $ Some background info: I have my ethernet driver compiled into my kernel. hareesh: hareesh/ $ lspci | grep Ethernet :00:12.0 Ethernet controller: National S

[gentoo-user] Bug Wrangling Event?

2005-11-11 Thread Chris White
Hi all, Now that my job situation has settled down, I have some free time floating around, and a bit of finances to cover it. That said, I'd like to see if there would be interest in a bug wrangling event of some sort taking place in the SF area. If I get enough interest, I'll go ahe

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG in glibc????

2005-11-01 Thread John Myers
On Sunday 30 October 2005 13:54, capsel wrote: > is it a bug in glibc or in my code? Probably not a bug in glibc. I'm 99% sure that there are no bugs that obvious in printf or strcmp. glibc is absolutely the most tested code in a GNU/Linux system, aside from the kernel itself, seeing as it is use

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG in glibc????

2005-11-01 Thread Billy Holmes
capsel wrote: j=strcmp( "log", *(lines+i) ); printf( "ble\n" ); if( strcmp( "log", *(lines+i) ) == 0 ) { printf( "ble2\n" ); it looks to me like you're probably getting an invalid pointer reference. When th

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG in glibc???? [WAY OT]

2005-10-30 Thread Richard Fish
capsel wrote: Hi all, is it a bug in glibc or in my code? This is so far off topic, it isn't even funny. But, I see a couple bugs in your code. I will cover them inline: if( ( config_content == NULL ) || ( config_content==0 ) ) Not really a bug here, but since NULL and 0

[gentoo-user] BUG in glibc????

2005-10-30 Thread capsel
Hi all, I am writing some program... simple program and I've got some code: j=strcmp( "log", *(lines+i) ); printf( "ble\n" ); if( strcmp( "log", *(lines+i) ) == 0 ) { printf( "ble2\n" ); it is in for loop. "b

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug, or PEBKAC?

2005-10-12 Thread Richard Fish
Holly Bostick wrote: Hey, I've been trying to run an emerge -uaDtv world for the past couple of days, and dev-libs/liboil fails to upgrade from 0.3.2 to 0.3.3 with the following error: conv_sse.c: In function `conv_f32_s32_sse': conv_sse.c:44: error: `__m128' undeclared (first use in this func

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug, or PEBKAC?

2005-10-12 Thread Billy Holmes
FEATURES="autoconfig ccache distlocks fixpackages sandbox sfperms strict userpriv usersandbox" I would try getting rid of ccache, first.. and if you have distcc installed (portage still could be using it if you updated your profile and path). -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Bug, or PEBKAC?

2005-10-12 Thread Billy Holmes
are you using distcc or ccache? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Bug, or PEBKAC?

2005-10-12 Thread Holly Bostick
Hey, I've been trying to run an emerge -uaDtv world for the past couple of days, and dev-libs/liboil fails to upgrade from 0.3.2 to 0.3.3 with the following error: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -Wall -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../.. -O2 -O2 -march=athlon-xp -mfpmath=ss

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG? - bridge-utils no binary?

2005-08-09 Thread Rumen Yotov
Hi, ...SKIP... > > Ognjen Bezanov wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I am building a linux AP using a clean installation of gentoo and this >> howto: >> >> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Building_a_Wireless_Access_Point_With_Gentoo >> >> >> Everything was going great until I came to emerging bridge-utils. >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] BUG? - bridge-utils no binary?

2005-08-09 Thread Steven Susbauer
Check the emerge logs and see what files were copied where (the part where it's like /usr/bin/brctl - or whatever). It may be that the command is slightly different with this version. *shrugs* Ognjen Bezanov wrote: Hello I am building a linux AP using a clean installation of gentoo and this h

[gentoo-user] BUG? - bridge-utils no binary?

2005-08-09 Thread Ognjen Bezanov
Hello I am building a linux AP using a clean installation of gentoo and this howto: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Building_a_Wireless_Access_Point_With_Gentoo Everything was going great until I came to emerging bridge-utils. the actual emerging didnt fail (using "emerge bridge-utils -av") but ty

  1   2   >