Re: [gentoo-user] AutoScan Ebuild [req]

2005-11-05 Thread Nick Rout
Haven't actually done a new ebuild, just did those steps manually (ie installed libzvt, renamed the ebuild and picked up the chmod thing from an error message after I started the program.) I did post about it on bugzilla too, maybe the original authopr will fix the ebuild? On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 20

Re: [gentoo-user] AutoScan Ebuild [req]

2005-11-05 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Rout wrote: >>New ebuilds are submitted to bugs.gentoo.org. Searching there will find >>this: Oh, damn, I completely forgot about bugs.gentoo.org. (/me smashes himself with a happer). > I had to make 3 changes to the ebuild: Could you send

Re: [gentoo-user] AutoScan Ebuild [req]

2005-11-05 Thread Nick Rout
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:39:50 +1300 Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > New ebuilds are submitted to bugs.gentoo.org. Searching there will find > this: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75151 I had to make 3 changes to the ebuild: 1. add x11-libs/libzvt as a dependency, or it will not

Re: [gentoo-user] AutoScan Ebuild [req]

2005-11-05 Thread Nick Rout
New ebuilds are submitted to bugs.gentoo.org. Searching there will find this: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75151 On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 16:41:56 -0300 "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > People, > > Does anyb

[gentoo-user] AutoScan Ebuild [req]

2005-11-05 Thread Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 People, Does anybody have an AutoScan ebuild for gentoo? autoscan being the networking monitoring tool, nothing to do with autoconf, etc. I'm willing to create one, but so far, most people complains that AutoScan does not properly w