Re: [gentoo-user] Apache vhosts revisited

2005-09-05 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 22:17:15 +0200, q-parser wrote: > I don't see much into this, but will it not be in confict if you use > the same IP and port for 2 ServerNames? No, this is how name based virtual hosting works. The browser sends a host: header with the request, Apache uses this to determine w

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache vhosts revisited

2005-09-05 Thread q-parser
John Dangler wrote: After going back through the entire thread dealing with the vhosts problem that was running here recently, I tried to setup my local fileserver with the ‘default’ apache server, and adding 1 virtual host. my apache2.conf file is basically a default (out of the box) setup,

RESOLVED [gentoo-user] Apache vhosts revisited

2005-09-05 Thread John Dangler
. Thanks to sub on the IRC channels for the input! John D -Original Message- From: John Dangler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 12:05 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Apache vhosts revisited Importance: High After going back through

[gentoo-user] Apache vhosts revisited

2005-09-05 Thread John Dangler
After going back through the entire thread dealing with the vhosts problem that was running here recently, I tried to setup my local fileserver with the ‘default’ apache server, and adding 1 virtual host.   my apache2.conf file is basically a default (out of the box) setup, with the line