On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 09:53:21PM +0200, Penguin Lover b.n. squawked:
> It basically doesn't say "you better upgrade to texlive before tetex
> goes in the /dev/null department". It says "well, tetex maintainer steps
> down." That's very much different -someone could have stepped in and
> replac
Willie Wong ha scritto:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:33:04PM +0200, b.n. wrote:
ehm, I guess I wasn't clear.
You *already* knew:
- That there are texlive and tetex
- That tetex was EOLed and texlive was the next choice
- That tetex and texlive are mutually exclusive
- That the ebuild was in the tr
2 matches
Mail list logo
