On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:07:23 +1300, Nick Rout wrote:
> I haven't been brave enough to read all of this thread, but as we seem
> to have gotten onto the topic of spelling, has anyone noticed that the
> saviour linux website now consists of:
>
> "Saviour Linux
> comming soon!"
Yes,last week - henc
I haven't been brave enough to read all of this thread, but as we seem
to have gotten onto the topic of spelling, has anyone noticed that the
saviour linux website now consists of:
"Saviour Linux
comming soon!"
copied and pasted, complete with the misspelling of the third word LOL.
On Mon, 16 J
On 1/11/06, Eric Bliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 03:06 pm, Iain Buchanan wrote:> > > I think once we've got to the stage of UK (and AU) vs US spelling, I can> > > invoke "Godwin's Law"[1] hereby ending the discussion completely and
> > > immediately ;)> > >> > > [1] ht
On Thursday 12 January 2006 05:14, a tiny voice compelled Uwe Thiem to write:
> It's hardware, alright. And I could just confirm with the manufacturers
> that there, indeed, were two bugs in those thin clients.
>
some penicillin should take care of that
--
Regards, Ernie
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.o
On 12 January 2006 01:35, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:56 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> > Uwe
> > (who is good for throwing these Chinese solid state thin clients, I
> > have got yesterday, out of the [wW]indows)
>
> I hope you are referring to computer hardware and not undernourish
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 03:49 pm, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 15:29 -0800, Eric Bliss wrote:
> > Although, to actually give this post
> > SOME relevance to the original thread, will using Saviour Linux on your
> > computer assure it of going to Electronic Heaven when it fina
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 15:29 -0800, Eric Bliss wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 January 2006 03:06 pm, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > > I think once we've got to the stage of UK (and AU) vs US spelling, I can
> > > > invoke "Godwin's Law"[1] hereby ending the discussion completely and
> > > > immediately ;)
> >
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:56 +0200, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> Uwe
> (who is good for throwing these Chinese solid state thin clients, I
> have got yesterday, out of the [wW]indows)
I hope you are referring to computer hardware and not undernourished
oriental customers :)
--
Neil Bothwick
LaForge [ex
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 03:06 pm, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > > I think once we've got to the stage of UK (and AU) vs US spelling, I can
> > > invoke "Godwin's Law"[1] hereby ending the discussion completely and
> > > immediately ;)
> > >
> > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
> >
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 13:39 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:21:23 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
>
> > I think once we've got to the stage of UK (and AU) vs US spelling, I can
> > invoke "Godwin's Law"[1] hereby ending the discussion completely and
> > immediately ;)
> >
> > [1]
On 10 January 2006 18:17, Michael Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 16:03 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:
> > > It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but
> > > haven't had the time to do anything with. What i
On 11 January 2006 18:22, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:55:19 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
> > Ooh, Neil, you're such a pedant!
>
> You're too kind :)
Shivers are good for the soul. ;-)
... and pedants are good for software development.
Uwe
(who is good for throwing these Chinese
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:55:19 +0100, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Ooh, Neil, you're such a pedant!
You're too kind :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Press any key... no, no, no, NOT THAT ONE!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Neil Bothwick schreef:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:21:23 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
>
>
>>I think once we've got to the stage of UK (and AU) vs US spelling, I can
>>invoke "Godwin's Law"[1] hereby ending the discussion completely and
>>immediately ;)
>>
>>[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_l
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:21:23 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> I think once we've got to the stage of UK (and AU) vs US spelling, I can
> invoke "Godwin's Law"[1] hereby ending the discussion completely and
> immediately ;)
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
[quote]
It is considered p
Hello again.
I do think "To have some kind of useful standard among the many
distributions." is a good goal, but /Savio[u]?r Linux/ is a strange way
of doing it...
anyway, see below
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 12:34 +0100, Martin Eisenhardt wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> OK, this *is* getting rather of
Hello everyone,
OK, this *is* getting rather off-topic, but what the heck ... :-D
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 14:04, Mattias Merilai wrote:
> Antoine wrote:
> >> I'm glad you didn't write humor-impaired, because then we'd have had a
> >> long discussion on whether the longer "humour" stands out
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 10 January 2006 21:15
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A New Linux Way
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:00:17 + (WET), Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
>
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:04:27 +, Mattias Merilai wrote:
> Didn't that ou/o stuff in humour/humor, saviour/savior, colour/color
> etc. have anything to do with differences between uk and us english? I
> seem to remember that in uk they spell these words with ou and the lazy
> and/or progress
Antoine wrote:
I'm glad you didn't write humor-impaired, because then we'd have had a
long discussion on whether the longer "humour" stands out and
represents a great community better than the "traditional" (albeit more
recent) humor...
Didn't that ou/o stuff in humour/humor, saviour/savio
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:00:17 + (WET), Jorge Almeida wrote:
> Seriously, does someone find the talk in the site somewhat
> style-impaired? My limited domain of the English language doesn't make
> me the best judge, but some phrases make me wonder about how young the
> webmaster is, assuming tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petr Kocmid wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 04:40, Mark Stewart wrote:
>
>>Hello fellow Linux Users!
>>We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
>>Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:
>
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Dale wrote:
I hate to say this, but something is "fishy" here.
Now, let's not be hasty. The original post does say other distributions
will be allowed to remain independent. That's really generous.
Seriously, does someone find the talk in the site somewhat
style-impaired?
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 19:26, Robin wrote:
> NO kidding... I have to say just by the way the website is worded it
> sounds like a scam... You want to know what is even funnier is that
> this spam message has generated a boat load of responses :)
EM and all that.
--
Big Tone
--
gentoo-user@g
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 19:17, Dale wrote:
> >
> >I'm impressed with search skills Jorge. I couldn't even find the site.
>
> This help?
>
> http://saviourlinux.com/
>
> I hate to say this, but something is "fishy" here.
>
Cheers Dale.
It does seem weird.
--
Big Tone
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.or
NO kidding... I have to say just by the way the website is worded it
sounds like a scam... You want to know what is even funnier is that
this spam message has generated a boat load of responses :)
Robin
On 1/10/06, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Davison wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday 10 January 2
Tony Davison wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 12:36, Jorge Almeida wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why only those words "united, universal, unified" sound strange to me?
Having too much time in my hands, I visited the site. Couldn't find any
juice. Could i
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 12:36, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why only those words "united, universal, unified" sound strange to me?
>
> Having too much time in my hands, I visited the site. Couldn't find any
> juice. Could it be that the thing doesn't e
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 18:15 +0100, Antoine wrote:
> >>It it totally bug-free!
> ...
> > There's no such thing as "bug-free software", and Santa Claus does not
> > exist, neither does the Easter Bunny or Trolls (but I'm not really
> > certain about the trolls). There are two kinds of programs, the o
I'm glad you didn't write humor-impaired, because then we'd have had a
long discussion on whether the longer "humour" stands out and
represents a great community better than the "traditional" (albeit more
recent) humor...
Very humerous.
Antoine
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:29:11 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > It it totally bug-free!
> For the sarcasm impaired, this is a joke. Since they haven't produces
> any code (that any of us can see) it is inherently bug-free.
I'm glad you didn't write humor-impaired, because then we'd have h
ellotheth rimmwen wrote:
On 1/10/06, Darryl Wagoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I too looked at the Saviour Linux web site and my question is where's the
beef?
As a community project, we need to stand out. "Saviour" is the longer
word that is more.
Saviour Linux is its own. As its own, it
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 04:40, Mark Stewart wrote:
> Hello fellow Linux Users!
> We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
> Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:
You missed the target audience. Here at gentoo there are mostly hardcor
> It it totally bug-free!
How boring!
:)
Best regards
ce
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
It it totally bug-free!
...
There's no such thing as "bug-free software", and Santa Claus does not
exist, neither does the Easter Bunny or Trolls (but I'm not really
certain about the trolls). There are two kinds of programs, the ones
with discovered bugs and the ones with bugs to be discovered.
On 1/10/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:
>
> > It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but
> > haven't had the time to do anything with. What is the profit sharing
> > model? What makes this different
ary 2006 10:03, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wroteabout 'Re: [gentoo-user] A New Linux Way':> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:
> > It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but> > haven't had the time to do an
On Tuesday 10 January 2006 10:03, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] A New Linux Way':
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:
> > It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but
> > haven
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 16:03 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:
>
> > It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but
> > haven't had the time to do anything with. What is the profit sharing
> > model? What makes this differ
2006/1/10, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:> It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but> haven't had the time to do anything with. What is the profit sharing> model? What makes this different than other distro?
I
On 1/10/06, Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:> It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but> haven't had the time to do anything with. What is the profit sharing> model? What makes this different than other di
seems like the wrong place for such a pitch, proposal, proposition :-P, but seriously what r these people thinking?On 1/10/06, Neil Bothwick <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:
> It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but> ha
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0500, Darryl Wagoner wrote:
> It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but
> haven't had the time to do anything with. What is the profit sharing
> model? What makes this different than other distro?
It it totally bug-free!
--
Neil Bothwic
Huh? A Linux distro will stand out by how well or poorly the distro is, not by the name that is used.Gentoo is one such distro. Gentoo has been the best distro that I have used and I have used many. I would like to see a jump start version which was quicker to get going, but otherwise it is a gr
On 1/10/06, Darryl Wagoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I too looked at the Saviour Linux web site and my question is where's the
> beef?
As a community project, we need to stand out. "Saviour" is the longer
word that is more.
Saviour Linux is its own. As its own, it needs to be different than
Greetings,I too looked at the Saviour Linux web site and my question is where's the beef?It looks interesting concept similar to something I can up with but haven't had the time to do anything with. What is the profit sharing model? What makes this different than other distro?
Interesting idea.
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 12:36 +, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Why only those words "united, universal, unified" sound strange to me?
> >
> Having too much time in my hands, I visited the site. Couldn't find any
> juice. Could it be that the thing
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 12:23 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Mark Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
> > Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:
> > Saviour Linux is an easy an
2006/1/10, Mark Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello fellow Linux Users!We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:Saviour Linux is an easy and universal Linux distribution that pays
community programmers.
You took the words right out of my mouth Iain :-)
On 1/10/06, Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 12:36 +, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Why only those words "united, universal, unified" sound strange to me
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 12:36 +, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Why only those words "united, universal, unified" sound strange to me?
> >
> Having too much time in my hands, I visited the site. Couldn't find any
> juice. Could it be that the thing
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why only those words "united, universal, unified" sound strange to me?
Having too much time in my hands, I visited the site. Couldn't find any
juice. Could it be that the thing doesn't exist? No doc section, no
download section, no nothing except
Because they all mean the same thing :lol:
On 1/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Mark Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
> > Please visit the website for more information, but here is the
On 1/9/06, Mark Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
> Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:
> Saviour Linux is an easy and universal Linux distribution that pays
> community programmers.
> Savi
Thanks for spamming the gentoo-user list.
On 1/9/06, Mark Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello fellow Linux Users!
>
> We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
> Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:
>
>
> Saviour Linux is an easy
Hello fellow Linux Users!
We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:
Saviour Linux is an easy and universal Linux distribution that pays
community programmers.
Saviour Linux is not just another di
56 matches
Mail list logo
