Re: [gentoo-user] new version of gcc

2009-11-03 Thread Alex Schuster
Harry Putnam writes: > I noticed I've been masking gcc beyond version 4.3.2-r3, and have > forgotten why I had it masked. > > I'm updating world right now, and wondered if I were to move up to > most recent gcc (4.4.2), which would be a 5 version jump, what I could > expect in the way of problems

Re: [gentoo-user] new version of gcc

2009-11-02 Thread Graham Murray
Harry Putnam writes: > I noticed I've been masking gcc beyond version 4.3.2-r3, and have > forgotten why I had it masked. > > I'm updating world right now, and wondered if I were to move up to > most recent gcc (4.4.2), which would be a 5 version jump, what I could > expect in the way of problems

Re: [gentoo-user] new version of gcc

2009-11-02 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 03 November 2009, Harry Putnam wrote: > I noticed I've been masking gcc beyond version 4.3.2-r3, and have > forgotten why I had it masked. > > I'm updating world right now, and wondered if I were to move up to > most recent gcc (4.4.2), which would be a 5 version jump, what I could > e

[gentoo-user] new version of gcc

2009-11-02 Thread Harry Putnam
I noticed I've been masking gcc beyond version 4.3.2-r3, and have forgotten why I had it masked. I'm updating world right now, and wondered if I were to move up to most recent gcc (4.4.2), which would be a 5 version jump, what I could expect in the way of problems. Would I need to re-emerge just