On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
> 071214 Shawn Haggett wrote:
> >> CONFIG_HZ_100=y
> >> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
> >> # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
> >> # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
> >> CONFIG_HZ=100
> >
> > Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
>
Philip Webb wrote:
> I don't play games, but I've long had my desktop box using HZ_1000
> & it has always been very responsive (now Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.6.23-r3).
> That's certainly the first thing to try.
I use 100 Hz on an old P3 desktop/server. It's not a high traffic
server, but it does my web
071214 Shawn Haggett wrote:
>> CONFIG_HZ_100=y
>> # CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
>> # CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
>> # CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
>> CONFIG_HZ=100
> Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
> ie the CPU doesn't have to spend as much time switching between process
CONFIG_HZ_100=y
# CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
CONFIG_HZ=100
Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
This means that the CPU doesn't have to spend as much time switching
between processes. However it also means tha
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, James wrote:
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
betwen 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 the new scheduler was introduced. Most people (like
me) have had positive results related to gaming. But maybe bzflag is stupidly
coded?
Nonetheless you should try 'voluntary' preemp
Hello,
I use the gentoo kernel series for my production systems.
On my gaming system, I have a 2.6.22-gentoo-r8 kernel
that works very well for gaming (bzflag). It an amd64
with 2 gig of ram.
I've tried to build a 2.6.23-getnoo-r3 kernel for gaming
and it performs very poorly with no other chan
6 matches
Mail list logo
