On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:40:20 +0100
Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Dale wrote:
> > Anyone see a way to fix this? It's getting old seeing this every
> > week when I try to do my updates and it may be blocking other
> > updates as well.
>
> Take a look at everything Jigme wro
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:41, Dale wrote:
> From what I've read so far, opencascade wants a older ffmpeg than
> everything else I have installed. It looks like opencascade needs to
> upgrade its code to work with newer ffmpeg. If I understand it correctly.
Correct, according to the gentoo mainta
Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Dale wrote:
>> Anyone see a way to fix this? It's getting old seeing this every week
>> when I try to do my updates and it may be blocking other updates as well.
> Take a look at everything Jigme wrote, but the easy fix seems to
> disable USE="ff
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Dale wrote:
> Anyone see a way to fix this? It's getting old seeing this every week
> when I try to do my updates and it may be blocking other updates as well.
Take a look at everything Jigme wrote, but the easy fix seems to
disable USE="ffmpeg" on the opencascade pa
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 02:28:28 -0600
Dale wrote:
Trimming for brevity...
> Howdy,
>
> I either started a thread on this a while back or it was mentioned
> inside another thread. This has been popping up for months now.
> Either I have something set wrong or there is a problem in a ebuild or
> s
On 04/12/2023 08:28, Dale wrote:
Oh, I see the little pointing up there but in Konsole, they never
point up to the right place. If it has a clue, I wouldn't be able to
get help from it. Also, I have some options in make.conf for emerge so
I'm taking this from emerge.log to show the complet
Howdy,
I either started a thread on this a while back or it was mentioned
inside another thread. This has been popping up for months now. Either
I have something set wrong or there is a problem in a ebuild or
something. I just don't know what. This is what I get. I'm having to
use this comman
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:22:49PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:10:17 +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, as per [3], Logitech C-series cameras (among others)
> > utilise a proprietary extension to the Motion-JPEG format, in which
> > H.264 data is attached to
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:18:19PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> I don't have this webcam so I don't know if it will or won't play nicely with
> Linux, but at least ffmpeg seems to contain the requisite mjpeg codec:
>
> $ ffmpeg -hide_banner -codecs | grep mjpeg
> DEVIL. mjpegMotion J
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:10:17 +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> Unfortunately, as per [3], Logitech C-series cameras (among others)
> utilise a proprietary extension to the Motion-JPEG format, in which
> H.264 data is attached to the various JPEG key and delta frames in the
> APP0 field [4], as show
On Monday, 20 July 2020 19:10:17 BST Ashley Dixon wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> A while ago, I made the grave mistake of buying a Logitech C270 webcam
> [1], which initially seemed to be well-supported under Linux as a U.V.C.\
> camera [2]. As shown by the following (partial) output of `v4l2-ctl
Hi List,
A while ago, I made the grave mistake of buying a Logitech C270 webcam [1],
which initially seemed to be well-supported under Linux as a U.V.C.\ camera [2].
As shown by the following (partial) output of `v4l2-ctl --list-formats-ext`
suggests, the full 720p@30fps is only supporte
On Sunday 19 Feb 2017 09:01:55 Gevisz wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:15:33 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:01:52 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > > > I think the problem is that you don't allow chromium to be rebuilt,
> > > > because all your blocking packages depend on the installe
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:20:46 +0200 Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> On 18/02/2017 17:01, Gevisz wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:02:22 +0100 Johannes Rosenberger
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote:
> >>> Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
> >>
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:15:33 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:01:52 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
>
> > > I think the problem is that you don't allow chromium to be rebuilt,
> > > because all your blocking packages depend on the installed slot
> > > (indicated by the '=') and need to b
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:01:52 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > I think the problem is that you don't allow chromium to be rebuilt,
> > because all your blocking packages depend on the installed slot
> > (indicated by the '=') and need to be rebuilt in case ffmpeg is
> > upgraded. So, if you don't exclude c
On 18/02/2017 17:01, Gevisz wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:02:22 +0100 Johannes Rosenberger
> wrote:
>
>> On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote:
>>> Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
>>> trying to update my system,
>>> I have got the following error message:
>>
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:02:22 +0100 Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote:
> > Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
> > trying to update my system,
> > I have got the following error message:
> >
> > # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps
It's not an ffmpeg and libav conflict:
# bzcat /usr/share/doc/ffmpeg-3.2.4/libav-merge.txt.bz2
CONTEXT
===
The FFmpeg project merges all the changes from the Libav project
(https://libav.org) since the origin of the fork (around 2011).
...
( and thanks God the feud is over! I know no details
On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote:
> Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
> trying to update my system,
> I have got the following error message:
>
> # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask
> world --verbose-conflicts --exclude chromi
On 18 February 2017 at 12:21, gevisz wrote:
> # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask
> world --verbose-conflicts --exclude chromium
>
> [ebuild R] www-client/firefox-45.7.0 USE="(-gstreamer-0%)"
>
> What shall I do to solve this dependency conflict?
>
> Does
Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
trying to update my system,
I have got the following error message:
# emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask
world --verbose-conflicts --exclude chromium
These are the packages that would be merge
On 05/10/2015 18:25, Stroller wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 4 October 2015, at 11:38 p.m., Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
>>>
>>> Isn't mmxext amd-only?
>>
>> Definitely not. Intel designed mmx
>
> The ffmpeg has both "mmx" and "mmxe
Stroller wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 October 2015, at 11:38 p.m., Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
>>>
>>> Isn't mmxext amd-only?
>> Definitely not. Intel designed mmx
> The ffmpeg has both "mmx" and "mmxext" USE flags - presumably the
> On Sun, 4 October 2015, at 11:38 p.m., Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
>>
>> Isn't mmxext amd-only?
>
> Definitely not. Intel designed mmx
The ffmpeg has both "mmx" and "mmxext" USE flags - presumably they're not the
same
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 12:38:15AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 22:49, James Cloos wrote:
> >
> > And is there really any value from micromanaging things like that in an
> > ebuild?
>
> For ffmpeg? Yes.
Actually, I think modern versions of ffmpeg probably do not benefit as
much an
On 04/10/2015 22:49, James Cloos wrote:
> I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
>
> Isn't mmxext amd-only?
Definitely not. Intel designed mmx
>
> And is there really any value from micromanaging things like that in an
> ebuild?
For ffmpeg? Yes. I imagine users
I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
Isn't mmxext amd-only?
And is there really any value from micromanaging things like that in an
ebuild?
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 04/12/2015 04:08 PM, Dale wrote:
>> There's been a discussion on the default switching back to ffmpeg on
>> -dev too. I think I read that correctly.
>>
> Yeah, I read that too - apparently they are going to a saner default,
> i.e. USE="-libav".
>
> Darnit, I just read this
On 04/12/2015 04:08 PM, Dale wrote:
> There's been a discussion on the default switching back to ffmpeg on
> -dev too. I think I read that correctly.
>
Yeah, I read that too - apparently they are going to a saner default,
i.e. USE="-libav".
Darnit, I just read this within the last week or so.
Alan Grimes wrote:
> Mick wrote:
>>> Thanks for pointing this out. My mistake. Apologies for that.
>> What I wasn't sure is if ffmpeg will be removed in the future and gentoo
>> will
>> end up following debian, et al.
> Et al can go rot in hell. We use ffmpeg.
>
>
There's been a discussion on t
Mick wrote:
> >Thanks for pointing this out. My mistake. Apologies for that.
> What I wasn't sure is if ffmpeg will be removed in the future and gentoo will
> end up following debian, et al.
Et al can go rot in hell. We use ffmpeg.
--
IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel.
Powers are not rig
On Sunday 12 Apr 2015 20:48:29 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:30:43 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > > > grep libav /usr/portage/profiles/base/make.defaults
> > >
> > > # Move the current Gentoo preference (libav ove
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:30:43 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
>
> > > grep libav /usr/portage/profiles/base/make.defaults
> > # Move the current Gentoo preference (libav over ffmpeg)
> > USE="${USE} libav"
> >
> > If you want to use ffmpeg i
gevisz wrote:
> I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
> yet a year ago:
> $ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
> but now, while trying to use it, I get
>> bash: ffmpeg: command not found
> What happened?
>
> I still have virtual/ffmpeg package installed.
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:30:43 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
> > grep libav /usr/portage/profiles/base/make.defaults
> # Move the current Gentoo preference (libav over ffmpeg)
> USE="${USE} libav"
>
> If you want to use ffmpeg instead of libav, "It should be noted that the
> users still need to
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:27:17 -0400 Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Sunday, April 12, 2015 10:23:32 PM gevisz wrote:
> > Thank you for your reply. I am aware of that change. But the news says:
> >
> > "Users who currently use libav (the Gentoo default) do not have to
> > perform any action since
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:23 PM, gevisz wrote:
> 2015-04-12 22:04 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk >:
> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:58 PM, gevisz wrote:
> >>
> >> I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
> >> yet a year ago:
> >> $ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 ou
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 10:23:32 PM gevisz wrote:
> Thank you for your reply. I am aware of that change. But the news says:
>
> "Users who currently use libav (the Gentoo default) do not have to
> perform any action since USE=libav is enabled by default."
>
> So, I "performed no actions".
>
>
2015-04-12 22:04 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk :
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:58 PM, gevisz wrote:
>>
>> I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
>> yet a year ago:
>> $ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
>> but now, while trying to use it, I get
>> > bash: ff
2015-04-12 12:58 GMT-06:00 gevisz :
> I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
> yet a year ago:
> $ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
> but now, while trying to use it, I get
>> bash: ffmpeg: command not found
>
> What happened?
>
> I still have virtual/ff
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:58 PM, gevisz wrote:
> I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
> yet a year ago:
> $ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
> but now, while trying to use it, I get
> > bash: ffmpeg: command not found
>
> What happened?
>
> I still h
I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
yet a year ago:
$ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
but now, while trying to use it, I get
> bash: ffmpeg: command not found
What happened?
I still have virtual/ffmpeg package installed.
In my case it points to lib
On 01/28/2015 08:06 PM, Thanasis wrote:
> On 01/28/2015 05:12 PM, Jan Sever wrote:
>> On 01/28/2015 1:24 AM, Thanasis wrote:
>>> Both a greek words, not latin.
>>> polis = city
>>> poly = many/much
>>
>> Thanks for correcting, I don't know why I had fixed in mind that polis is
>> from
>> latin a
On 01/28/2015 05:12 PM, Jan Sever wrote:
On 01/28/2015 1:24 AM, Thanasis wrote:
Both a greek words, not latin.
polis = city
poly = many/much
Thanks for correcting, I don't know why I had fixed in mind that polis is from
latin and poly from greek. But I thought polis should be a city and won
On 01/27/2015 11:48 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:07:15 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
>> P.S. Btw. poli in politics is from latin word polis = a place, not poly
>> = many. But it's a nice parallel.
>
> Yes, and a tic is a nervous twitch, the blood sucking parasite is a tick,
>
On 01/28/2015 12:07 AM, Jan Sever wrote:
I found the bugzilla:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510340
So marking as SOLVED.
Thank you,
Jan Sever
P.S. Btw. poli in politics is from latin word polis = a place, not poly = many.
But it's a nice parallel.
Both a greek words, not latin.
p
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:07:15 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
> P.S. Btw. poli in politics is from latin word polis = a place, not poly
> = many. But it's a nice parallel.
Yes, and a tic is a nervous twitch, the blood sucking parasite is a tick,
but when did jokes have to be linguistically accurate?
-user@lists.gentoo.org
Datum: 27. 1. 2015 15:15:51
Předmět: Re: [gentoo-user] ffmpeg-2: when getting stable?
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:41:48 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
> when can we expect ffmpeg-2 to get stable? I found some information
> that it's because of building issues but I foun
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:41:48 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
> when can we expect ffmpeg-2 to get stable? I found some information
> that it's because of building issues but I found none. I looked into
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and there's no information about the
> reason.
package.mas
Hi all,
when can we expect ffmpeg-2 to get stable? I found some information that it's
because of building issues but I found none. I looked into
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and there's no information about the
reason.
Thanks in advance for your answer,
Jan Sever
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 02:43:17AM +0100, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked:
> Best thing to do is to remove video/ffmpeg from world in favour of
> virtual/ffmpeg so that Portage can work things out for itself.
Most likely (if you are on a desktop system), ffmpeg would be pulled
in as a dependency
On Thu, 17 May 2012 02:43:17 +0100
Stroller wrote:
>
> On 16 May 2012, at 23:29, john wrote:
> > ...
> > I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
> > emerge I get the following
> >
> > [blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg ("media-video/ffmpeg" is
> > blocking media-vid
On 16 May 2012, at 23:29, john wrote:
> ...
> I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
> emerge I get the following
>
> [blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg ("media-video/ffmpeg" is blocking
> media-video/libav-0.8.2)
>
> * Error: The above package list contains package
On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:29:11 +
john wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
> emerge I get the following
>
> [blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg ("media-video/ffmpeg" is blocking
> media-video/libav-0.8.2)
>
> * Error: The above package l
Hello,
I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
emerge I get the following
[blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg ("media-video/ffmpeg" is blocking
media-video/libav-0.8.2)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time o
> # echo | gcc -dM -E - -march=native
> /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/cc1 -E -quiet -v -
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -mtune=i686 -march=x86-64
Sorry, something went wrong while pasting this lines, here are the
correct ones:
# cc -mtune=i686 -E -v - &1 | grep cc1
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-
>> No nothing crazy:
>> CFLAGS="-Os -pipe -mtune=i686"
>
> i686? That's not amd64. You need something 64bit. Just use march=native
> instead of mtune=i686.
Wait, what! I could swear I was reading march=native just a few minutes ago.
mtune=i686 on amd64 just doesn't seem right, but it should co
Am Montag, 12. Dezember 2011, 13:28:39 schrieb Joseph:
> On 12/12/11 20:32, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> >> Configuring source in
> >> /var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
> >> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
> >> If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is
> No nothing crazy:
> CFLAGS="-Os -pipe -mtune=i686"
No you're right, that's nothing crazy.
Perhaps you could paste the complete build log of your failed merge to
pastebin[1].
Portage tells you where you can find that log file. The output of %
emerge --info might prove useful too.
[1] http://pas
On 12/12/11 14:29, Dale wrote:
[snip}
gcc-config -l
Then you can use gcc-config to set it if it
is not set. If it is set, it should look like this:
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.5.3 *
Note the little * on the end? That is the one that it is trying to
use. Some
Joseph wrote:
On 12/12/11 14:52, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
gcc-config $SOME_PROFILE
where SOME_PROFILE is something you'll find under /etc/env.d/gcc
After that, things worked fine for me again.
(I was in the process of building an email because I was going to ask
this list for help, and I fi
On 12/12/11 20:32, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the
--enable-cross-compile option.
Only do this if y
On 12/12/11 14:52, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
gcc-config $SOME_PROFILE
where SOME_PROFILE is something you'll find under /etc/env.d/gcc
After that, things worked fine for me again.
(I was in the process of building an email because I was going to ask
this list for help, and I figured out the s
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Joseph wrote:
> I"m trying to install "kino" but ffmpeg fails to compile:
>
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
>
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
> If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-
> Configuring source in
> /var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
> If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the
> --enable-cross-compile option.
> Only do this if you know what cross compiling mean
I"m trying to install "kino" but ffmpeg fails to compile:
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the --enable-cross-compile
option
Some ffmpeg-using applications (e.g. mplayer) allow you to pass numbers
of threads (e.g. I use 6 on my Core-I7) to ffmpeg; others (e.g.
chromium) do not.
So I'm thinking of hardwiring a default threads number=6 into the ffmpeg
source code; recompiling.
Q: Has anyone done this; if so any surpr
great, revdep-rebuild saved me. thanks ;)
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Dale wrote:
> Xi Shen wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> i am using gentoo x64, just have ffmpeg emerged, and successfully
>> emerged -u world. but when i ran ffmpeg -formats, i got a error
>> message saying that the libfaad.so.1 cannot
Xi Shen wrote:
> hi,
>
> i am using gentoo x64, just have ffmpeg emerged, and successfully
> emerged -u world. but when i ran ffmpeg -formats, i got a error
> message saying that the libfaad.so.1 cannot be found. i check my
> system, and i only have faad2 emerged. actually, the whole portage
> tree
hi,
i am using gentoo x64, just have ffmpeg emerged, and successfully
emerged -u world. but when i ran ffmpeg -formats, i got a error
message saying that the libfaad.so.1 cannot be found. i check my
system, and i only have faad2 emerged. actually, the whole portage
tree does not have something lik
Hi
I've used gentoo fo a couple of years and love it. Just now i use
mythbuntu, but i do miss gentoo. The problems with gentoo for me was a
few. I use the system as a desktop/fileserver/mythbackend. The problems
was mostly that nuvexport in portage is rather old, if i download it
from http://forev
Hello
Routine update to a system, leaves me with conflicting package
that want different versions of ffmpeg:
equery depends transcode
app-cdr/k3b-1.0.4 (encode? media-video/transcode)
equery depends xine-lib
kde-base/artsplugin-xine-3.5.9 (>=media-libs/xine-lib-1.0)
media-sound/amarok-1.4.9.1 (
I'm trying to create a streaming server using ffmpeg, and I'm stuck, so
please advise if You can.
I've tested :
* *ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20080326*
* *ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070616*
Both versions behave the same way. This is my emerge -pv ffmpeg
/media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20080326 USE="a52 aac amr bindi
On 3/27/06, Luigi Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need it because I must do dvdauthoring... I solve it dropping the
> ieee1394 flag, but I can't understand how I can use it...
> Thanks for your helps,
I would suggest filing a bug report on bugs.gentoo.org if there isn't
one already.
Have you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alle 21:00, lunedì 27 marzo 2006, kashani ha scritto:
> Luigi Pinna wrote:
> > media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20051216 +a52 +aac
> > (-altivec) -debug -doc -dts +encode +ieee1394 +imlib (-mmx)
> > -network +ogg -oss +sdl +test +theora +threads +truetype +v
Luigi Pinna wrote:
media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20051216 +a52 +aac
(-altivec) -debug -doc -dts +encode +ieee1394 +imlib (-mmx) -network
+ogg -oss +sdl +test +theora +threads +truetype +v4l +vorbis +xvid
+zlib
All the dependencies are installed (if I use emerge -D ffmpeg is the
once package)
I
On 27 March 2006 07:34, Luigi Pinna wrote:
> Hello!
> I broke a disc and I had to reinstall my gentoo box in these days; in
> the ffmpeg emerging, I found a lot of problem: no ebuild will complete
> with success the process.
> All the ebuild failed with with error:
> from
> /var/tmp/portage/ffmpeg-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I broke a disc and I had to reinstall my gentoo box in these days; in
the ffmpeg emerging, I found a lot of problem: no ebuild will complete
with success the process.
All the ebuild failed with with error:
from
/var/tmp/portage/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p
I tried that yesterday, but it didnt appear to load the video. It sat
there trying to load, eating 99% of the CPU for about 20 mins. The file
is only 136MB's and I wouldnt expect it to take that long on an AMD 2800
w/1GB ram. It looked promising, but didnt seem to work. The Mplayer
info on the
Ryan schreef:
> I am looking for an excellent ffmpeg front end/gui. It doesnt matter if
> its a console or X based front end, as long as it supports as many
> features of ffmpeg as possible for decoding/encoding processes. The
> main purpose is to convert about 200 mp4's that I have into an SVCD/
I am looking for an excellent ffmpeg front end/gui. It doesnt matter if
its a console or X based front end, as long as it supports as many
features of ffmpeg as possible for decoding/encoding processes. The
main purpose is to convert about 200 mp4's that I have into an SVCD/VCD
or mpg format with
82 matches
Mail list logo
