Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Dale wrote:
>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:04:06 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> Why would they? /usr/kde/3.5/bin comes first in KDE 3 sessions and
>>> last in KDE 4 sessions. There's no problem at all.
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:54:52 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> Maybe because you *do* use kdeprefix. Maybe it's better without it,
> >> like here, where it works ;D
> >
> > I get the same order on this computer, which does not have KDE4.
>
> That's because you don't have it.
>
> `echo
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:04:06 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why would they? /usr/kde/3.5/bin comes first in KDE 3 sessions and
last in KDE 4 sessions. There's no problem at all.
Not here
% echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:04:06 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>
> Why would they? /usr/kde/3.5/bin comes first in KDE 3 sessions and
> last in KDE 4 sessions. There's no problem at all.
Not here
% echo $PATH
/usr/loc
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:04:06 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why would they? /usr/kde/3.5/bin comes first in KDE 3 sessions and
last in KDE 4 sessions. There's no problem at all.
Not here
% echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/i486-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bi
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:04:06 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >> Why would they? /usr/kde/3.5/bin comes first in KDE 3 sessions and
> >> last in KDE 4 sessions. There's no problem at all.
> >
> > Not here
> >
> > % echo $PATH
> > /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/opt/bin:/usr/i486-pc-linux-gnu/
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:37:08 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Because /usr/bin will always be in your PATH, so even if you are
running a KDE 3 session, KDE4 programs will be loaded.
Why would they? /usr/kde/3.5/bin comes first in KDE 3 sessions and
last in KDE 4 sessions
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:57:22 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
And how is putting KDE4 in /usr/kde going to help in this? What
difference does it make if the wrong path is chosen? Surely, it
doesn't matter a bit how that path looks lik
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 13:37:08 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > Because /usr/bin will always be in your PATH, so even if you are
> > running a KDE 3 session, KDE4 programs will be loaded.
>
> Why would they? /usr/kde/3.5/bin comes first in KDE 3 sessions and
> last in KDE 4 sessions. There's
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:57:22 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>
>>> And how is putting KDE4 in /usr/kde going to help in this? What
>>> difference does it make if the wrong path is chosen? Surely, it
>>> doesn't matter a bit how that path looks l
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:57:22 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
And how is putting KDE4 in /usr/kde going to help in this? What
difference does it make if the wrong path is chosen? Surely, it
doesn't matter a bit how that path looks like if it's wrong. If a KDE4
path would
Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:57:22 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
And how is putting KDE4 in /usr/kde going to help in this? What
difference does it make if the wrong path is chosen? Surely, it
doesn't matter a bit how that path looks like if it's wrong. If a
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:57:22 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>
>> And how is putting KDE4 in /usr/kde going to help in this? What
>> difference does it make if the wrong path is chosen? Surely, it
>> doesn't matter a bit how that path looks like if it's wrong. If a K
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:57:22 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> And how is putting KDE4 in /usr/kde going to help in this? What
> difference does it make if the wrong path is chosen? Surely, it
> doesn't matter a bit how that path looks like if it's wrong. If a KDE4
> path would come before a K
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:18:27 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> OK, now I'm really curious; turns out they are NOT dependencies :P I
> just checked with equery and nothing depends on them. Is that normal?
> I mean, startkde for example is crucial to even start KDE 3 and it's
> not a dependency?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:20:25AM +0200, Penguin Lover Nikos Chantziaras
squawked:
> I'm not using -meta packages. Many packages they pulled in was stuff I
> don't wanted (like PIM). I emerged KDE packages one-by-one and went with
> what got pulled in as dependencies.
Uh.. then what exactly
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Willie Wong wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:18:27AM +0200, Penguin Lover Nikos
>> Chantziaras squawked:
>>> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
kde-base/kate
kde-base/kdebase-startkde
kde-base/ksmserver
These were dependencies and therefore were not in
Willie Wong wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:18:27AM +0200, Penguin Lover Nikos Chantziaras
squawked:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
kde-base/kate
kde-base/kdebase-startkde
kde-base/ksmserver
These were dependencies and therefore were not in my world file. If they
get unmerge, things will b
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:18:27AM +0200, Penguin Lover Nikos Chantziaras
squawked:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> kde-base/kate
>> kde-base/kdebase-startkde
>> kde-base/ksmserver
>> These were dependencies and therefore were not in my world file. If they
>> get unmerge, things will break.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 20 December 2008 14:35:13 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 20 December 2008 11:53:05 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
kdeprefix has nothing to do with KDE3. It's not needed. It's only
needed to have many KDE4 versions at the same time.
That'
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
kde-base/kate
kde-base/kdebase-startkde
kde-base/ksmserver
These were dependencies and therefore were not in my world file. If
they get unmerge, things will break. KDevelop will break without Kate,
and KDE 3.5 itself will break without the other two. :P
OK, n
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:34:39 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Another problem, this time not technical. I just don't want many of
those packages in my world file. I want to use depclean and have those
packages removed when the package that depends on them is also removed.
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 06:34:39 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Another problem, this time not technical. I just don't want many of
> those packages in my world file. I want to use depclean and have those
> packages removed when the package that depends on them is also removed.
> The depclea
On Saturday 20 December 2008 14:35:13 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On Saturday 20 December 2008 11:53:05 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >>> You can start by giving the relevant information, like what exactly
> >>> related to kde is in world?. Chances are you only have KDE there,
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 06:34 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > [...]
> > The reason is that KDE4 is a new product and has nothing to do with KDE3
> > other than the name. And another reason is the problem I'm describing
> > in this very thread which should have not be
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> [...]
>> The reason is that KDE4 is a new product and has nothing to do with
>> KDE3 other than the name. And another reason is the problem I'm
>> describing in this very thread which should have not been a problem
>> if KDE4 had its own tree.
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[...]
The reason is that KDE4 is a new product and has nothing to do with KDE3
other than the name. And another reason is the problem I'm describing
in this very thread which should have not been a problem if KDE4 had its
own tree. Now I'm required to have non-straig
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 20 December 2008 11:53:05 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
You can start by giving the relevant information, like what exactly
related to kde is in world?. Chances are you only have KDE there, and
emerge will probably want to nuke all but the latest SLOT. Common
problems
On Saturday 20 December 2008 11:53:05 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > You can start by giving the relevant information, like what exactly
> > related to kde is in world?. Chances are you only have KDE there, and
> > emerge will probably want to nuke all but the latest SLOT. Common
> > problems with KD
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 20 December 2008 08:27:40 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
emerge -av --depclean:
kde-base/kopete
selected: 3.5.10
protected: none
omitted: 4.1.3
kde-base/kget
selected: 3.5.10
protected: none
omitted: 4.1.3
kde
30 matches
Mail list logo
