On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:45:41PM +, Stroller wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2008, at 07:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Konqueror would be even harder, since the binary itself is less than
>> 5K and all the functionality presumably comes from the libs.
>
> That makes me imagine it might actually be _easi
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:31:28 +0900, William Kenworthy wrote:
> > I think it would be more appropriate to include it in kprinter, but I
> > tried "kprinter someurl" and it couldn't handle HTML.
> Why not a pdf printer:
>
> net-print/cups-pdf
Because you would still need something to render the
On 29 Jan 2008, at 07:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:49:19AM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
Here's your chance. Add the feature to Firefox. ;)
...
Konqueror would be even harder, since the binary itself is less than
5K and all the functionality presumably comes from the
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 08:42 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:24:37 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > $ konqueror http://url.com/page.html --output page.pdf
> > >
> > > It seems like a common enough thing to want to do.
> >
> > I was astounded to not find such an opti
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:24:37 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > $ konqueror http://url.com/page.html --output page.pdf
> >
> > It seems like a common enough thing to want to do.
>
> I was astounded to not find such an option in either firefox or
> konqueror.
I think it would be more appropri
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:49:19AM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> Here's your chance. Add the feature to Firefox. ;)
I took a look at firefox; it looks like the GUI environment is a
pretty big part of things, and it wasn't at all obvious how to get
around that. But then again, I only spent a hal
On 2008-01-29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think so. What I think is odd is that you can't just say
>>
>> $ konqueror http://url.com/page.html --output page.pdf
>>
>> It seems like a common enough thing to want to do.
It's not that uncommon amon users. It appears i
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 08:44:03PM -0700, Justin Findlay wrote:
>
> I don't think so. What I think is odd is that you can't just say
>
> $ konqueror http://url.com/page.html --output page.pdf
>
> It seems like a common enough thing to want to do.
I was astounded to not find such an option in e
On AD 2008 January 27 Sunday 01:43:26 PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I had some problems with some of the more complex web sites, so I
> didn't explore this much. One thing I had tried was taking snapshots
> to jpeg pictures, but I had no way of telling when the page had
> finished loading.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 09:26:33PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2008-01-27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Firefox doesn't print to pdf, however.
>
> It'll print to postscript, and ps2pdf has always worked well
> for me.
I had some problems with some of the more complex w
On 2008-01-27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firefox doesn't print to pdf, however.
It'll print to postscript, and ps2pdf has always worked well
for me.
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I represent a
at s
11 matches
Mail list logo
