[gentoo-user] Re: Stuch on k3b at dep install of Transcode

2006-02-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Daniel da Veiga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe that's why the version is masked (along with other reasons), so, > try to go back to the stable tree, if you have any problems with the > stable version, that's something to worry about, if not, welcome to > the bleeding edge and testing problems

[gentoo-user] Re: Stuch on k3b at dep install of Transcode

2006-02-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What are the "specific errors" that you are receiving? Perhaps the > problem is your transcode USE flags; what are those? I got it solved and moved on so not sure how accurate this is. Both times it broke for me... first emerging k3b it stalled on tr

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Stuch on k3b at dep install of Transcode

2006-02-11 Thread Daniel da Veiga
On 2/11/06, Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uwe Klosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I had a similar problem some months ago. I can't remember all the details, > > but i think it had to do something with avi. I changed the > > useflags of transcode until the emerge of the latest versi

[gentoo-user] Re: Stuch on k3b at dep install of Transcode

2006-02-11 Thread Harry Putnam
Uwe Klosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had a similar problem some months ago. I can't remember all the details, > but i think it had to do something with avi. I changed the > useflags of transcode until the emerge of the latest version finished without > any error. Try to unmask the latest ve