[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

John covici wrote: on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:54:43 -0400, John covici wrote: > > > > Did you try updating glibc even though it's not a dependency with > > > x86? > > > > Nope, because I was hesitant being this is an unstable

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Neil Bothwick([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:54:43 -0400, John covici wrote: > > > > Did you try updating glibc even though it's not a dependency with > > > x86? > > > > Nope, because I was hesitant being this is an unstable version > > It is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 03:54:43 -0400, John covici wrote: > > Did you try updating glibc even though it's not a dependency with > > x86? > > Nope, because I was hesitant being this is an unstable version It is not unstable, the ~arch keyword means the ebuild is still in testing. Nowhere in the

[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

John covici wrote: on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > Did you try updating glibc even though it's not a dependency with x86? Nope, because I was hesitant being this is an unstable version -- maybe I should go completely unstable -- I will see what happens. I do

[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > John covici wrote: > > on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > > > John covici wrote: > > > > on Monday 07/14/2008 Joe User([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > > > > > John covici schrieb: > > > > > > [

[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

John covici wrote: on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > John covici wrote: > > on Monday 07/14/2008 Joe User([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > > > John covici schrieb: > > > > [snip] > > > > Portage 2.1.4.4 (default/linux/x86/2008.0/developer, gcc-4.1.2, glibc-2.6.

[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

on Tuesday 07/15/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > John covici wrote: > > on Monday 07/14/2008 Joe User([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > > > John covici schrieb: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > Portage 2.1.4.4 (default/linux/x86/2008.0/de

[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

John covici wrote: on Monday 07/14/2008 Joe User([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > John covici schrieb: > > Hi, > > > > > [snip] > > > > Portage 2.1.4.4 (default/linux/x86/2008.0/developer, gcc-4.1.2, glibc-2.6.1-r0, 2.6.24-gentoo-r5 i686) >^

[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

John covici wrote: on Monday 07/14/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > John covici wrote: > > Hi. I am having problems compiling gcc vrsions 4.2.4 or 4.3.1-r1. > > The errors are very similar -- here is what I am getting when > > compiling 4.3.1-r1. > > For GCC 4.3.x you nee

[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

on Monday 07/14/2008 Nikos Chantziaras([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote > John covici wrote: > > Hi. I am having problems compiling gcc vrsions 4.2.4 or 4.3.1-r1. > > The errors are very similar -- here is what I am getting when > > compiling 4.3.1-r1. > > For GCC 4.3.x you need to update sys-libs/

[gentoo-user] Re: Problems compiling gcc 4.2.4 and 4.3.1-r1

John covici wrote: Hi. I am having problems compiling gcc vrsions 4.2.4 or 4.3.1-r1. The errors are very similar -- here is what I am getting when compiling 4.3.1-r1. For GCC 4.3.x you need to update sys-libs/glibc. You need at least 2.7-r2. I'm using GCC 4.3.x on my system and it emerged fi