[gentoo-user] Re: Nagios or Konqueror

2007-10-19 Thread James
Mick gmail.com> writes: > Thanks James, but the server owner wants Nagios (for now). Is there a link > to > a (factual) comparative summary between the two monitoring systems? Does > JFFNMS have as many plugins as Nagios? I'd be grateful for your (subjective) > views too. :) How about:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Nagios or Konqueror

2007-10-19 Thread Mick
On Friday 19 October 2007, James wrote: > Justin T. gmx.net> writes: > > > The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died > > > unexpectedly. === > > > > > > > > > This seems to be a recently developed behaviour. Other browsers

[gentoo-user] Re: Nagios or Konqueror

2007-10-19 Thread James
Justin T. gmx.net> writes: > > The process for the https://nagios.blah-blah.com protocol died > > unexpectedly. === > > > This seems to be a recently developed behaviour. Other browsers do not > > have such problems. > There seems to be an