Hi Francesco,
on Monday, 2007-04-23 at 21:58:18, you wrote:
> Based on my experience I would add to verify also the upper MTU value
> really supported.
According to Documentation/networking/e1000.txt, the adapters should all
support 16K frames. The limiting factor would be the switch's 9K limit,
You can also fiddle with the rsize, wsize NFS mount parameters.
--
Fabio A. Correa D.
Physics Dept, Universidad Nacional, Bogota, Colombia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My webpage and OpenPGP key at http://facorread.150m.com
My alexandria.cc address is not availa
On Monday 23 April 2007, kashani wrote:
> Tony Stohne wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Uwe Thiem said the following on 2007-04-23 17:53:
> >> Just curious: What kind of network (layer 2) is this that allows
> >> an MTU of 9000?
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >
> > It sounds lik
On 23 April 2007, ames wrote:
> kashani badapple.net> writes:
> > >> Just curious: What kind of network (layer 2) is this that allows an
> > >> MTU of 9000?
> > >> Uwe
> > >
> > > It sounds like Gigabit Ethernet to me.
> >
> > Keep in mind that not all fastE or gigE switches support jumbo frames.
kashani badapple.net> writes:
> >> Just curious: What kind of network (layer 2) is this that allows an MTU of
> >> 9000?
> >> Uwe
> > It sounds like Gigabit Ethernet to me.
> Keep in mind that not all fastE or gigE switches support jumbo frames.
> Additionally not all cards support jumbo fra
5 matches
Mail list logo