On 06/11/2009 04:52 PM, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:17:37 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
It's only there where's disk activity. For example, if I have 4 or more
torrents downloading. When that happens, typing "mc" (to start midnight
commander) needs about 4 seconds. It's al
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:17:37 +0300
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> It's only there where's disk activity. For example, if I have 4 or more
> torrents downloading. When that happens, typing "mc" (to start midnight
> commander) needs about 4 seconds. It's almost instant without LVM.
>
> The speed
On 06/11/2009 10:40 AM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009 09:33:46 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
I tried too but it slows down disk speed to a crawl when there's disk
activity by an order of magnitude (commands take 3-4 seconds to execute
while without LVM they give sub-second respo
Am Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009 09:49:02 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> or you never 'saw' the impact because you are used to it.
Errh, no.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009 09:33:46 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
> > I tried too but it slows down disk speed to a crawl when there's disk
> > activity by an order of magnitude (commands take 3-4 seconds to execute
> > while without LVM they give su
Am Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009 09:33:46 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
> I tried too but it slows down disk speed to a crawl when there's disk
> activity by an order of magnitude (commands take 3-4 seconds to execute
> while without LVM they give sub-second responses.)
Hmm, that's strange. I've never see
On 06/11/2009 10:06 AM, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009 00:44:51 schrieb Philip Webb:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Alexander Pilipovsky wrote:
But how many space on hard disk for it will be good?
I haven't followed this thread in detail, but has anyone suggested LVM ?
No
7 matches
Mail list logo
