[gentoo-user] Re: Library file formats

2009-10-16 Thread walt
On 10/16/2009 11:06 AM, Mike Edenfield wrote: > On 10/16/2009 12:54 PM, walt wrote: >> On 10/16/2009 04:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:20:30 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> I thought I'd have a play with swami, but the emerge fails with "/bin/sed: can't read /usr/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Library file formats

2009-10-16 Thread Mike Edenfield
On 10/16/2009 12:54 PM, walt wrote: On 10/16/2009 04:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:20:30 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: I thought I'd have a play with swami, but the emerge fails with "/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib64/libogg.la: No such file or directory", and indeed there is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Library file formats

2009-10-16 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Freitag 16 Oktober 2009, walt wrote: > On 10/16/2009 04:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:20:30 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> I thought I'd have a play with swami, but the emerge fails with > >> "/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib64/libogg.la: No such file or directory", > >>

[gentoo-user] Re: Library file formats

2009-10-16 Thread walt
On 10/16/2009 04:37 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:20:30 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> I thought I'd have a play with swami, but the emerge fails with >> "/bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib64/libogg.la: No such file or directory", >> and indeed there is none such. > > The elog m