On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:30:19 +0200, gibbo...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Real men manage their own /etc/fstab. ;-)
> +1
Hal is about a lot more than mounting memory sticks.
> (I just noticed that hal creates /media but didn't added it to my fstab,
> maybe for the 0.5.12 ? :))
Hal doesn't create the
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:58:18PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Real men manage their own /etc/fstab. ;-)
+1
(I just noticed that hal creates /media but didn't added it to my fstab,
maybe for the 0.5.12 ? :))
> "HAL was responsible for opening almost 2000 files. It will read various XML
> fi
Am Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:58:18 -0400
schrieb "Michael P. Soulier" :
> On 13/04/09 Mike Edenfield said:
>
[...]
> > Also, just for the record, hal isn't by any stretch of the imagination a
> > "new" daemon. Its been a USE option for Gentoo's gnome-vfs package since
> > Gnome 2.8, in 2004.
>
> Y
On 13/04/09 Mike Edenfield said:
> Having said that, hal is exactly the kind of thing I would expect Gentoo
> users to flock to: its powerful, flexible, extensible, configurable, and
> it's the new cutting-edge stuff from the upstream vendors. Before it went
> offline, the Gentoo wiki was easi
Hello,
about the *mandatory* it was a bad expression, I should have said :
'make two new daemons mandatory IF you want to follow the modern-move' :)
Of course the 'hal' useflag is such a gentoo nice thing !
I did the xorg+hal switch, but I forgot that hald make use of dbus
(I would dreamed about
gibbo...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I don't want hal, one more daemon running only to... spot /dev/input/*,
from what I understand xf86-input-* does this pretty well. I won't
unplug my mouse and so want to keep my xorg simple conf.
Hal does a lot more than just monitor /dev/input for you.
It's a fra
gibbo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I'm trying to follow this philosophy which appears more difficult than I
> primary though.
> 1) I don't want hal, one more daemon running only to... spot /dev/input/*,
> from what I understand xf86-input-* does this pretty well. I won't
> unplug my mouse and so want to
On Tuesday 14 April 2009 01:08:23 gibbo...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm trying to follow this philosophy which appears more difficult than I
> primary though.
> 1) I don't want hal, one more daemon running only to... spot /dev/input/*,
> from what I understand xf86-input-* does this pretty well. I won't
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:08:23 +0200, gibbo...@gmail.com wrote:
> I believed gentoo users would be more sceptic when it comes to make a
> new daemon mandatory ;)
How can hal be mandatory when it is controlled by a USE flag? :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Virtue is it's own punishment.
signature.asc
Desc
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 03:50:09PM -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> Dale wrote:
> After reading the upgrade guide, it seemed clear to me that my first
> attempt would be without hal, and without my old xorg.conf.
>
> It initially crashed because of some erroneous opengl softlinks
> (bugzilla already no
On 4/13/2009 3:50 PM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
I have not yet added hal; seems like unnecessary complexity at this
point - I don't know how it will make life better.
The major benefit of hal is for people who don't actually *have* an
"old" xorg.conf. In most cases, the X server can do a better jo
Dale wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Dale wrote:
Justin wrote:
Peter Ruskin schrieb:
Well, I did the upgrade at last, with -hal and my proven
xorg-config, and the result is unusable. I use kde-3.5.9 and
the mouse doesn't work right - right-click has no ef
Mike Edenfield wrote:
> On 4/13/2009 12:55 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>> Paul Hartman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Mark Knecht
>>> wrote:
There's a lot of us voting 1 today I think.
How do things like this go stable when they aren't stable, tested and
>
On 4/13/2009 12:55 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Mark Knecht
wrote:
There's a lot of us voting 1 today I think.
How do things like this go stable when they aren't stable, tested and
not causing problems. (rhetorical...)
I must
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
There's a lot of us voting 1 today I think.
How do things like this go stable when they aren't stable, tested and
not causing problems. (rhetorical...)
I must be lucky because I've been using it since it hit
15 matches
Mail list logo
