On Sunday 02 March 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "What supports what" is a good reason for non-filesystem backups. For
> example partimage has trouble with XFS (still...after all these
> years...). A program like dd doesn't care the fs. Call it a device
> backup if you like. This is your bas
Jonathan Haws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday March 2 2008 16:43, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> Right - what you intend the backup to protect against drives all this
>> sort of stuff.
>
> The thing that is driving my backups is a hard disk failure.
Of course :)
> Hence I was
> using Ghost ins
"What supports what" is a good reason for non-filesystem backups. For
example partimage has trouble with XFS (still...after all these
years...). A program like dd doesn't care the fs. Call it a device
backup if you like. This is your basic choice in backup - device or fs.
Me personally, dd_res
3 matches
Mail list logo
