Jarry wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why should I use "native" if I know that my CPU is "athlon64" :P
Are you sure your cpu is not "athlon64-sse3"?
That was just an example. For my CPU I use "-march=core2" :)
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:28:40 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> If you have look for it more carefully you would have found similar
> recommendation on the official gentoo pages:
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/distcc.xml I think the above page qualify
> as an official doc. isn't it?
Yes.
> "...-march=native
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Joseph wrote:
> On 04/06/09 21:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:35:56 -0600, Joseph wrote:
>>
>>> Well, according to gentoo recommendations it is not so:
>>> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags
>>
>> Information on gentoo-wiki.com is not a
On 04/06/09 21:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:35:56 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Well, according to gentoo recommendations it is not so:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags
Information on gentoo-wiki.com is not a Gentoo recomendation. Look at
docs.gentoo.org for those.
--
Nei
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:35:56 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> Well, according to gentoo recommendations it is not so:
> http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags
Information on gentoo-wiki.com is not a Gentoo recomendation. Look at
docs.gentoo.org for those.
--
Neil Bothwick
Anything worth fighting fo
On 04/06/09 18:53, Jarry wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why should I use "native" if I know that my CPU is "athlon64" :P
Are you sure your cpu is not "athlon64-sse3"?
Look for pni in cat /proc/cpuinfo :-)
Jarry
Here is my cpuinfo;
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why should I use "native" if I know that my CPU is "athlon64" :P
Are you sure your cpu is not "athlon64-sse3"?
Look for pni in cat /proc/cpuinfo :-)
Jarry
--
___
This mailbox accepts e-mails only from sel
On 04/06/09 11:56, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[snip]
~adj~
I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on AMD64
I recompile my system using this new flag and have a lot of problems. an
examples new xorg-server-1.5... would not compile, I switch back to my
previous settings:
Joseph wrote:
On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
performed "emerge system" ?
What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
--
~adj~
I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -m
9 matches
Mail list logo