[gentoo-user] Re: Devicekit - especially just for Dale

2010-01-19 Thread Harry Putnam
Peter Humphrey writes: > See? I don't have to remember any options, I just key up or down to the > config I want. Easy. Nice... thanks

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Devicekit - especially just for Dale

2010-01-19 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 19 January 2010 15:15:20 Harry Putnam wrote: > In fact, whatever way you do it, can you give some kind of example? No trouble. Here's a section of my grub.conf: - title=Gentoo Linux 2.6.32-r1 root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/kernel-x86_64-2.6.32-gentoo-r1 root=/dev/sda5 v

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Devicekit - especially just for Dale

2010-01-19 Thread Dale
Harry Putnam wrote: Peter Humphrey writes: On Tuesday 19 January 2010 09:03:57 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:21:18 -0600, Dale wrote: I usually just do softlevel=single or that other one I got wrote down here somewhere. That turns off almost everything,

[gentoo-user] Re: Devicekit - especially just for Dale

2010-01-19 Thread Harry Putnam
Peter Humphrey writes: > On Tuesday 19 January 2010 09:03:57 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:21:18 -0600, Dale wrote: >> > I usually just do softlevel=single or that other one I got wrote down >> > here somewhere. >> >> That turns off almost everything, whereas gentoo=nox does a n

[gentoo-user] Re: Devicekit - especially just for Dale

2010-01-18 Thread walt
On 01/18/2010 09:53 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: Just as code is read many more times than it is written, so is a package configured by the end user many more times than the config parser studied by the developer. Your post makes sense until you realise that the use of XML in a configuration design