On Freitag 14 August 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Am Freitag 14 August 2009 10:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > > Note that on Linux you may need to add "-no-fsync" because file I/O is
> > > slow on Linux. On Solaris, not using -no-fsync slows things down by
> > > apr
On Samstag 15 August 2009, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Freitag 14 August 2009 22:47:46 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > > Am Freitag 14 August 2009 10:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > > > Note that on Linux you may need to add "-no-fsync" because file I/O
> > > > is slow on
Am Freitag 14 August 2009 22:47:46 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > Am Freitag 14 August 2009 10:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> > > Note that on Linux you may need to add "-no-fsync" because file I/O is
> > > slow on Linux. On Solaris, not using -no-fsync slows things down by
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Freitag 14 August 2009 10:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
>
> > Note that on Linux you may need to add "-no-fsync" because file I/O is slow
> > on Linux. On Solaris, not using -no-fsync slows things down by aprox. 10%
> > but allows star to grant that everything was real
Am Freitag 14 August 2009 10:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> Note that on Linux you may need to add "-no-fsync" because file I/O is slow
> on Linux. On Solaris, not using -no-fsync slows things down by aprox. 10%
> but allows star to grant that everything was really copied to stable
> storage. On
Am Freitag 14 August 2009 18:11:34 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> star by default only overwrites a file if it is older than the file that is
> going to be extracted.
Thanks. Will definitely try it out on next occasion.
Bye...
Dirk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Freitag 14 August 2009 10:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
>
> > The fastest method for copying directory trees (typicalls 30% faster than
> > any other known method) is to use star:
> >
> > star -copy -p -xdot -acl -sparse -C .
>
> That's a really nice one. However, do
Am Freitag 14 August 2009 10:50:45 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
> The fastest method for copying directory trees (typicalls 30% faster than
> any other known method) is to use star:
>
> star -copy -p -xdot -acl -sparse -C .
That's a really nice one. However, does it also handle the "update "
case
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/14/2009 05:47 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for a faster way to do a
> >
> > cp -a r
> >
> > locally on one machine with one harddisk inside.
> >
> > Is there a neat trick to accomplish this faster than
> > good old cp?
On Freitag 14 August 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 08/14/2009 05:47 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for a faster way to do a
> >
> > cp -a r
> >
> > locally on one machine with one harddisk inside.
> >
> > Is there a neat trick to accomplish this faste
On 08/14/2009 05:47 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a faster way to do a
cp -a r
locally on one machine with one harddisk inside.
Is there a neat trick to accomplish this faster than
good old cp?
Nope. Some people like to use pipes in hope to speed it up,
11 matches
Mail list logo
