Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-07 Thread Peter Karlsson
On Fri, 6 May 2005, James wrote: The most uncooperative company is Intel, which has started a sham "open source" BIOS project. The software consists of all the unimportant parts of of a BIOS, without the hard parts. It won't run, and doesn't bring us any closer to a BIOS that does run. It is just a

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-06 Thread James
Norbert Kamenicky xmedia.sk> writes: > > > Yes, I many times removed BIOS extension chips (not needed during kernel > boot) from different cards, just to boot faster... > if it's not easy, there is always a possibility to cut chip select/ > enable (CS/CE) wire near to chip's pin. OK > > Linux

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-06 Thread James
Peter Karlsson student.chalmers.se> writes: > > For most of the legacy hardware: drives, floppy, CD, mouse, serial ports > > this may be true. But, let's think about ACPI, I2C, sensors, SMBus, > > Dallas one-wire, and the myriad of undocumented hardware/comm channels > > going on the motherboard.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-06 Thread Norbert Kamenicky
James wrote: > Norbert Kamenicky xmedia.sk> writes: > > > >>The purpose of BIOS is not to provide complete and excellent HW >>maintenance in multitasking environment, but system boot up only. >>Maybe there are some exceptions, but generaly if kernel is alive, >>u can safely remove all BIOS chip

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-06 Thread Mark Knecht
On 5/6/05, Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Afaiu, you don't need to modify the bios. > http://www.xbox-linux.org/Software_Method_HOWTO AFAIU this is not appropriate and won't work for the newest versions of the XBox. (Version 1.6b) The newest versions of the XBox have stuff in the S

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-06 Thread Peter Karlsson
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Mark Knecht wrote: My main interest in this area is one that most here won't probably have much experience on - Gentoo-xbox. In the case of Gentoo proper running on the XBox there is a large amount of confusion and differing opinions about BIOS. Clearly you have to make a change

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-06 Thread Peter Karlsson
On Thu, 5 May 2005, James wrote: For most of the legacy hardware: drives, floppy, CD, mouse, serial ports this may be true. But, let's think about ACPI, I2C, sensors, SMBus, Dallas one-wire, and the myriad of undocumented hardware/comm channels going on the motherboard. Not to mention that the evil

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-05 Thread Mark Knecht
Been there, done that. Lots of info but none on this question. thanks, Mark On 5/5/05, Roy O. Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howdy, > > Just did a search "linux xbox bios" and hit http://xbox-linux.org which > sounds like exactly what > you are looking for. > > HTH, > Roy > > > -- > gen

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-05 Thread Roy O. Wright
Howdy, Just did a search "linux xbox bios" and hit http://xbox-linux.org which sounds like exactly what you are looking for. HTH, Roy -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On 5/5/05, Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am sure there must be xbox-linux mailing lists of forums out there > somewhere... There are. They are mostly full of confused people with many different agendas. It's very hard to weed out the responses that make sense. 99% of the people inhabiti

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-05 Thread Nick Rout
I am sure there must be xbox-linux mailing lists of forums out there somewhere... However I don't know why you would need to put a different bios in. On Thu, 5 May 2005 16:34:16 -0700 Mark Knecht wrote: > > My main interest in this area is one that most here won't probably > have much experien

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-05 Thread Mark Knecht
On 5/5/05, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Norbert Kamenicky xmedia.sk> writes: > > > The purpose of BIOS is not to provide complete and excellent HW > > maintenance in multitasking environment, but system boot up only. > > Maybe there are some exceptions, but generaly if kernel is alive, > >

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-05 Thread James
Norbert Kamenicky xmedia.sk> writes: > The purpose of BIOS is not to provide complete and excellent HW > maintenance in multitasking environment, but system boot up only. > Maybe there are some exceptions, but generaly if kernel is alive, > u can safely remove all BIOS chips from it's sockets.

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-05 Thread James
Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes: > 2) If my machines are depending on system BIOS is there a way for me > to tell what calls are being made to system BIOS, or at least > understanding what parts of system BIOS Linux is using? Hello Mark, First post did not seem to make it. Here's a good intro ar

[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] - BIOS after Gentoo is up

2005-05-05 Thread James
Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes: > 1) After my machines are running Gentoo is system BIOS still being > used in ANY way? Please assume P4/Athlon XP level machines. > > 2) If my machines are depending on system BIOS is there a way for me > to tell what calls are being made to system BIOS, or at lea