Harry Putnam wrote:
> If my setup using no hal, and xorg.conf is going to become outdated
> and stop working anytime soon?
I seriously doubt the xorg.conf is going away in the foreseeable future
so I wouldn't worry. I haven't heard any of the developers on xorg mail
list talking about this either
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:25:49 -0500, Mike Edenfield
wrote:
> On 11/4/2009 10:51 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I didn't want to derail the ongoing thread about hal/xorg with this
>> question there.
>>
>> Far as I remember I haven't done anything special concerning hal but
>> at some point hal disappear
On 11/4/2009 10:51 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
I didn't want to derail the ongoing thread about hal/xorg with this
question there.
Far as I remember I haven't done anything special concerning hal but
at some point hal disappeared. And is not on my system anymore.
I believe that some packages in p
Harry Putnam writes:
> Far as I remember I haven't done anything special concerning hal but
> at some point hal disappeared. And is not on my system anymore.
Strange. Is hal still in your USE flags?
It is not really neded, but I think it's nice to have - maybe not for
x.org, but for other thing
On Mittwoch 04 November 2009, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I didn't want to derail the ongoing thread about hal/xorg with this
> question there.
>
> Far as I remember I haven't done anything special concerning hal but
> at some point hal disappeared. And is not on my system anymore.
>
> I've always use
I didn't want to derail the ongoing thread about hal/xorg with this
question there.
Far as I remember I haven't done anything special concerning hal but
at some point hal disappeared. And is not on my system anymore.
I've always used and /etc/X11/xorg.conf file for starting X.
What I'm wonderin
6 matches
Mail list logo
