Holly Bostick wrote:
> OK, since this is getting to be kind of a whole "thing", I've split it off.
>
> This message is (or should be) signed. Hopefully using PGP/MIME, which,
> if I understand Neil correctly, is what I'm supposed to do.
>
> You all have undoubtedly realized by now that I have lit
Hi,
Holly Bostick wrote:
>OK, since this is getting to be kind of a whole "thing", I've split it off.
>
>This message is (or should be) signed. Hopefully using PGP/MIME, which,
>if I understand Neil correctly, is what I'm supposed to do.
>
>
>
Yes, it's pgp/mime, by memory this is the newer form
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:18:41 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> This message is (or should be) signed. Hopefully using PGP/MIME, which,
> if I understand Neil correctly, is what I'm supposed to do.
Yes, it worked. You mail appears here with the icon to show it has a
valid (but untrusted) signature.
Holly Bostick wrote:
> OK, since this is getting to be kind of a whole "thing", I've split it off.
>
> This message is (or should be) signed. Hopefully using PGP/MIME, which,
> if I understand Neil correctly, is what I'm supposed to do.
Yes, it is working fine now.
>
> You all have undoubtedly
OK, since this is getting to be kind of a whole "thing", I've split it off.
This message is (or should be) signed. Hopefully using PGP/MIME, which,
if I understand Neil correctly, is what I'm supposed to do.
You all have undoubtedly realized by now that I have little experience
and less understan
5 matches
Mail list logo
