On 03/09/2012 11:29 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> ...which means to me and the problems I have: Reemerge make 3.81
> ???or...
I would prefer a patch to the Makefile (like Tood Goodman proposed
earlier) over a downgrade of make. I just meant to provide more
information about the issue. Let
Sebastian Pipping [12-03-09 23:16]:
> Hello,
>
>
> zhe troublesome changes occured between 3.81 and 3.82. There is a
> tracker bug on related breakage in case you are interested:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=gmake-3.82
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Sebastian
>
...which means to me a
Hello,
zhe troublesome changes occured between 3.81 and 3.82. There is a
tracker bug on related breakage in case you are interested:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=gmake-3.82
Best,
Sebastian
* meino.cra...@gmx.de [120309 14:54]:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile a linux-kernel for an embedded system.
> There is an (older) build environment.
> The kernel is based on a 2.4er linux kernel.
> When doing a
> make menuconfig
> I get:
>
> make menuconfig
> Makefile:441: *** mixed impl
Hi,
I am trying to compile a linux-kernel for an embedded system.
There is an (older) build environment.
The kernel is based on a 2.4er linux kernel.
When doing a
make menuconfig
I get:
make menuconfig
Makefile:441: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.
[1]8814 exit 2 make men
5 matches
Mail list logo