Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-28 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: > I did some digging.  I found some info on rsync to a networked system.  > I switched to that method.  This is the command I used.  > > > time rsync -uivr --progress /home/dale/Desktop/Data/* > root@10.0.0.5:/mnt/backup > > > My old way did act odd.  It would read a lot of data from th

Re: [gentoo-user] Removing LVM from disk, or disks, and being like new drives again.

2025-05-27 Thread Dale
byte.size...@simplelogin.com wrote: > Dale wrote: >> I'm not necessarily needing to use shred or dd everything to make >> sure data can never be recovered, just reset to like new so I can start >> clean with a fresh new setup. >> <>> What is the fastest way > > In that scenario I would simply use g

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Firefox ads

2025-05-26 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Mon, May 26, 2025 at 04:50:37PM +0100 schrieb Peter Humphrey: > Greetings, > > Has anyone succeeded with an ad blocker for Firefox? I've tried the top three > recommended and none of them make the slightest difference. What are those three? I use a pihole in my home WiFi for all devices. And

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Firefox ads

2025-05-26 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Mon, May 26, 2025 at 12:32:08PM -0400 schrieb Jack: > I use AdBlock Plus, and it works fine for me. You might be interested to switch to uBlock Origin. It is more efficient[0] and has long had its day[1]. [0] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-vs.-ABP:-efficiency-compared [1] uBloc

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Firefox ads

2025-05-26 Thread zyxhere💭
On Mon, May 26 2025 at 15:57:06 +00:00:00, Khaosgrille wrote: Ublock origin works fine for me. With Firefox and Librewolf (both bin, the latter from some unofficial repo) Be aware Youtube is doing lots of A/B testing, in case thats your issue. Also make sure all filter lists are up to d

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Firefox ads

2025-05-26 Thread cimw8twu
The Firefox page on the Gentoo wiki mentions the add blocker AdNausium. I use that successfully. On other systems I have just used an add blocking hosts file. Also works pretty well, though not as well as AdNausium. Has the advantage that it applies system wide and does not require any browser

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Firefox ads

2025-05-26 Thread Dale
Peter Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > Has anyone succeeded with an ad blocker for Firefox? I've tried the top three > recommended and none of them make the slightest difference. > > If not Firefox, is there an equivalent browser that can block sponsored > entries? The two chrome versions apparen

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Firefox ads

2025-05-26 Thread Jack
I use AdBlock Plus, and it works fine for me. Out of curiousity, which three have you tried?

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Firefox ads

2025-05-26 Thread Khaosgrille
Ublock origin works fine for me. With Firefox and Librewolf (both bin, the latter from some unofficial repo) Be aware Youtube is doing lots of A/B testing, in case thats your issue. Also make sure all filter lists are up to date. publickey - Khaosgrille@protonmail.com - 0xE78BC986.asc Descripti

[gentoo-user] [OT] Firefox ads

2025-05-26 Thread Peter Humphrey
Greetings, Has anyone succeeded with an ad blocker for Firefox? I've tried the top three recommended and none of them make the slightest difference. If not Firefox, is there an equivalent browser that can block sponsored entries? The two chrome versions apparently aren't available as binpkgs, a

Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-26 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > On Monday, 19 May 2025 14:39:21 British Summer Time Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I'm wanting to move a Data partition over to a new set of drives that >> are encrypted. I decided the easiest way to do this is to put the new >> drives on the NAS box and mount them like I do when I b

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem when installing two packages from the binhost

2025-05-25 Thread Dr Rainer Woitok
cdr. Eli Schwartz analyzed it and said that the new > package still provides a symlink for the old file. See > https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/5ae92a27-eee8-454d-abf7-33de95a0e...@gentoo.org/ > for details." Done. Bug 956615. Sincerely, Rainer

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo on WSL (feedback and testers wanted!)

2025-05-24 Thread Matt Jolly
On 25/5/25 13:33, Matt Jolly wrote: You will need to sync the gentoo repos first: `su -c 'emerge sudo && emerge --sync'` should do the trick for you. `su -c 'emerge --sync && emerge sudo', rather. Don't know how I got that backwards!

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo on WSL (feedback and testers wanted!)

2025-05-24 Thread Matt Jolly
On 24/5/25 21:54, Stefan Schmiedl wrote: Hello Matt, thanks for making the decision what to use on the office computer just a tiny bit harder :-) Hi Stefan, Happy to help :) stefan@pc23 ~ $ su -c 'emerge sudo' Password: !!! Section 'gentoo' in repos.conf has location attribute set to none

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem when installing two packages from the binhost

2025-05-24 Thread Eli Schwartz
y noticed with libraw and libcdr. Eli Schwartz analyzed it and said that the new package still provides a symlink for the old file. See https://public-inbox.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/5ae92a27-eee8-454d-abf7-33de95a0e...@gentoo.org/ for details." -- Eli Schwartz OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-python/wxpython Command 'sip-build --no-compile' failed with exit code 1.

2025-05-24 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: > Ionen Wolkens wrote: >> On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 01:47:15PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: >>> On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 10:49:43AM -0500, Dale wrote: Howdy, I synced my main rig this morning.  Everything compiled fine but wxpython.  I did some searches but couldn't find

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-python/wxpython Command 'sip-build --no-compile' failed with exit code 1.

2025-05-24 Thread Dale
Ionen Wolkens wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 01:47:15PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: >> On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 10:49:43AM -0500, Dale wrote: >>> Howdy, >>> >>> I synced my main rig this morning.  Everything compiled fine but >>> wxpython.  I did some searches but couldn't find anything like this.

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-python/wxpython Command 'sip-build --no-compile' failed with exit code 1.

2025-05-24 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 01:47:15PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 10:49:43AM -0500, Dale wrote: > > Howdy, > > > > I synced my main rig this morning.  Everything compiled fine but > > wxpython.  I did some searches but couldn't find anything like this.  > > This is what it s

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-python/wxpython Command 'sip-build --no-compile' failed with exit code 1.

2025-05-24 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 10:49:43AM -0500, Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I synced my main rig this morning.  Everything compiled fine but > wxpython.  I did some searches but couldn't find anything like this.  > This is what it spits out.  > > > line 437: column 29: template argument 'T' must expand t

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-python/wxpython Command 'sip-build --no-compile' failed with exit code 1.

2025-05-24 Thread yahoo
Hello, I don't have that package, so I'll try some hypothesis based on the log: Il 24/05/25 17:49, Dale ha scritto: Emerging (1 of 1) dev-python/wxpython-4.2.3-r1::gentoo Failed to emerge dev-python/wxpython-4.2.3-r1, Log file:   '/var/log/portage/dev-python:wxpython-4.2.3-r1:20250524-15423

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem when installing two packages from the binhost

2025-05-24 Thread Dr Rainer Woitok
Eli, On Fri, 23 May 2025 14:08:09 -0400 you wrote: > ... > Sorry for the confusion I guess, but I *fixed* it. > ... > The fix means new binary packages will build without using those > libraries at all. It also added a new build dep, so the binhost > recompiled them, hence newly running "emerge -

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-python/wxpython Command 'sip-build --no-compile' failed with exit code 1.

2025-05-24 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > > I don't have wxpython installed to be able to compare. Your build.log > complains about Doxygen, so it may not be a bad idea to 'emerge -1av app-text/ > doxygen' first and try again with dev-python/wxpython after that. I tried that, same error.  I may sync the tree again in t

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-python/wxpython Command 'sip-build --no-compile' failed with exit code 1.

2025-05-24 Thread Michael
On Saturday, 24 May 2025 16:49:43 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I synced my main rig this morning. Everything compiled fine but > wxpython. I did some searches but couldn't find anything like this. > This is what it spits out. > > >>> Emerging (1 of 1) dev-python/wxpython-4.2.3

[gentoo-user] dev-python/wxpython Command 'sip-build --no-compile' failed with exit code 1.

2025-05-24 Thread Dale
Howdy, I synced my main rig this morning.  Everything compiled fine but wxpython.  I did some searches but couldn't find anything like this.  This is what it spits out.  >>> Emerging (1 of 1) dev-python/wxpython-4.2.3-r1::gentoo >>> Failed to emerge dev-python/wxpython-4.2.3-r1, Log file: >>>  '

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo on WSL (feedback and testers wanted!)

2025-05-24 Thread Stefan Schmiedl
Hello Matt, thanks for making the decision what to use on the office computer just a tiny bit harder :-) -- Original Message -- From "Matt Jolly" To gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Date 24.05.2025 04:45:30 Subject [gentoo-user] Gentoo on WSL (feedback and testers wanted!

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem when installing two packages from the binhost

2025-05-24 Thread Mickaël Bucas
Le ven. 23 mai 2025 à 19:00, Dr Rainer Woitok a écrit : > > On Sat, 10 May 2025 15:26:23 +0200 I myself wrote: > > > ... > > yesterday evening I ran into a problem involving packages "=media-libs/ > > libraw-0.21.2" and "=media-libs/libcdr-0.1.8", "emerge", the binhost, > > "revdep-rebuild",

[gentoo-user] Gentoo on WSL (feedback and testers wanted!)

2025-05-23 Thread Matt Jolly
Hi everyone, Over the last little while I've been inspired to improve the Gentoo WSL experience. My end goal here is to get a Gentoo image distributed via the Windows Store which can be installed with minimal user interaction. So far it's looking pretty successful: using the stage3-openrc-desk

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem when installing two packages from the binhost

2025-05-23 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 5/23/25 1:00 PM, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote: > After having been out of town for a while I now found the time to get > back to this problem. I just booted my laptop and ran these first two > commands again. But -- lo and behold! -- now "revdep-rebuild" didn't > belch: > > $ sudo emerge --

[gentoo-user] Re: Problem when installing two packages from the binhost

2025-05-23 Thread Dr Rainer Woitok
On Sat, 10 May 2025 15:26:23 +0200 I myself wrote: > ... > yesterday evening I ran into a problem involving packages "=media-libs/ > libraw-0.21.2" and "=media-libs/libcdr-0.1.8", "emerge", the binhost, > "revdep-rebuild", and possibly also the configuration of my rig. The > problem is rel

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox and USE flags

2025-05-22 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday, 21 May 2025 15:40:22 British Summer Time Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 5/21/25 10:01 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: --->8 > > Have I missed something obvious again? > > That doesn't look like a valid package.use line. See `man 5 portage` > under "package.use", in particular, > > > USE flags

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck operational error

2025-05-22 Thread Dale
yahoo wrote: > Il 22/05/25 22:02, yahoo ha scritto: >> Il 22/05/25 20:13, Dale ha scritto: >>> yahoo wrote: >>> Is this a driver we should all disable or do you have a different use >>> case than most?  I ask because mine is on as well.  Given the large >> >> DON'T DISABLE IT! >> > > Sorry, I just

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck operational error

2025-05-22 Thread yahoo
Il 22/05/25 22:02, yahoo ha scritto: Il 22/05/25 20:13, Dale ha scritto: yahoo wrote: Is this a driver we should all disable or do you have a different use case than most?  I ask because mine is on as well.  Given the large DON'T DISABLE IT! Sorry, I just re-read what I wrote and the stuff

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck operational error

2025-05-22 Thread yahoo
Il 22/05/25 20:13, Dale ha scritto: yahoo wrote: Is this a driver we should all disable or do you have a different use case than most?  I ask because mine is on as well.  Given the large DON'T DISABLE IT! fsck must be executed on unmounted filesystem and for 'root fs' that normally happens on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck operational error

2025-05-22 Thread Dale
yahoo wrote: > Il 09/04/25 18:38, ralfconn ha scritto: >> Il 21/09/24 18:16, ralfconn ha scritto: >>> Upon boot OpenRc shows this warning: >>> >>> fsck: checking local filesystem >>> fsck: fsck.ext4 device or resource busy while trying to open /dev/ >>> nvme0n1p6 >>> fsck: filesystem mounted or ope

[gentoo-user] Re: fsck operational error

2025-05-22 Thread yahoo
Il 09/04/25 18:38, ralfconn ha scritto: Il 21/09/24 18:16, ralfconn ha scritto: Upon boot OpenRc shows this warning: fsck: checking local filesystem fsck: fsck.ext4 device or resource busy while trying to open /dev/ nvme0n1p6 fsck: filesystem mounted or opened exclusively by another program?

Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-21 Thread Michael
On Wednesday, 21 May 2025 20:42:28 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > Michael wrote: > > On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 17:30:34 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > >> I had a idea. I checked permissions of things while connected to the > >> new data drive set. Then I pulled the backup drive set from the s

Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-21 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 17:30:34 British Summer Time Dale wrote: >> >> I had a idea. I checked permissions of things while connected to the >> new data drive set. Then I pulled the backup drive set from the safe >> and hooked it up. I then checked the permissions of it. There i

Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-21 Thread Michael
On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 17:30:34 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > Michael wrote: > > On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 14:27:51 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > >> Michael wrote: > >>> OK, I am confused ... :-/ > >>> > >>> If you want to update the contents of a fs over the network, then rsync > >>> is >

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox and USE flags

2025-05-21 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 5/21/25 10:01 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > I found a Gentoo binpkg of firefox yesterday, to use which I had only to set > L10N="-en-GB*" against www-client/firefox in package.use; all other settings > were all right as they were. > > I did that and the binpkg was fetched and inst

[gentoo-user] Firefox and USE flags

2025-05-21 Thread Peter Humphrey
Greetings, I found a Gentoo binpkg of firefox yesterday, to use which I had only to set L10N="-en-GB*" against www-client/firefox in package.use; all other settings were all right as they were. I did that and the binpkg was fetched and installed. Today, portage wants to ignore that USE flag and r

[gentoo-user] Help with server HDD layout

2025-05-21 Thread Raphael Mejias Dias
Hello, I am looking for some help with updating my home server. Context: I have been running an old server at home for a long time. The setup was done when I was trying to understand virtual machines, by the end it became stable and I let it working. Now I need to update the VM disk. Actual Str

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-21 Thread Michael
On Wednesday, 21 May 2025 12:02:36 British Summer Time Matt Jolly wrote: > On 21/5/25 20:56, whiteman808 wrote: > > Does make sense buying new router or just repurposing this PC will be a > > better idea? > > That's up to you and what makes the most sense right now. You can always > change your mi

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-21 Thread Matt Jolly
On 21/5/25 20:56, whiteman808 wrote: Does make sense buying new router or just repurposing this PC will be a better idea? That's up to you and what makes the most sense right now. You can always change your mind later and repurpose the hardware for something else. My router is still a SFF deskt

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-21 Thread Alarig Le Lay
Hello, On Wed 21 May 2025 12:56:01 GMT, whiteman808 wrote: > Does make sense buying new router or just repurposing this PC will be > a better idea? I’ve always reused my old hardware for routers and it works very well. Right now my home router is a Shuttle DS81D and in datacenter I’m using severa

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-21 Thread whiteman808
Does make sense buying new router or just repurposing this PC will be a better idea? Dnia 21 maja 2025 12:49:08 CEST, Matt Jolly napisał/a: >On 21/5/25 20:42, whiteman808 wrote: >> Will something bad happen if I reuse over-spec mentioned PC instead of >> buying a new Mikrotik, for example spend

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-21 Thread Matt Jolly
On 21/5/25 20:42, whiteman808 wrote: Will something bad happen if I reuse over-spec mentioned PC instead of buying a new Mikrotik, for example spending too much money on electric energy bills? Energy usage will likely be higher, but that's offset by the cost of having to buy low-power hardware

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-21 Thread whiteman808
Will something bad happen if I reuse over-spec mentioned PC instead of buying a new Mikrotik, for example spending too much money on electric energy bills? Getting additional network card is no problem for me, I have in home an 4-port Intel NIC. Dnia 20 maja 2025 04:12:04 CEST, Matt Jolly napi

Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13

2025-05-20 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 00:04:01 British Summer Time Michael wrote: >> On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 00:00:35 British Summer Time Eli Schwartz wrote: >>> On 5/19/25 6:27 PM, Michael wrote: No buildpkg on this system. :-( >>> Gentoo provides a large (45 gb) public buildpkg cache at

Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13

2025-05-20 Thread Michael
On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 00:04:01 British Summer Time Michael wrote: > On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 00:00:35 British Summer Time Eli Schwartz wrote: > > On 5/19/25 6:27 PM, Michael wrote: > > > No buildpkg on this system. :-( > > > > Gentoo provides a large (45 gb) public buildpkg cache at > > https://

Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-20 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 14:27:51 British Summer Time Dale wrote: >> Michael wrote: >>> OK, I am confused ... :-/ >>> >>> If you want to update the contents of a fs over the network, then rsync is >>> your tool. Why is NFS coming into this at all? >>> >>> Assuming the user IDs are

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-20 Thread Jay Faulkner
On 5/19/25 7:12 PM, Matt Jolly wrote: A re-used SFF PC and cheap network card may be more cost effective than buying a new router! Note: do not make the mistake I once did and try using an external NIC. Even with fast enough USB speeds, it was never performant enough for a router :).

Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-20 Thread Michael
On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 14:27:51 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > Michael wrote: > > OK, I am confused ... :-/ > > > > If you want to update the contents of a fs over the network, then rsync is > > your tool. Why is NFS coming into this at all? > > > > Assuming the user IDs are the same acros

Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-20 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > On Monday, 19 May 2025 14:39:21 British Summer Time Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I'm wanting to move a Data partition over to a new set of drives that >> are encrypted. I decided the easiest way to do this is to put the new >> drives on the NAS box and mount them like I do when I b

Re: [gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-20 Thread Michael
On Monday, 19 May 2025 14:39:21 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I'm wanting to move a Data partition over to a new set of drives that > are encrypted. I decided the easiest way to do this is to put the new > drives on the NAS box and mount them like I do when I backup my large > Vide

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-20 Thread Michael
On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 03:12:04 British Summer Time Matt Jolly wrote: > On 20/5/25 09:55, whiteman808 wrote: > > Can you recommend some Mikrotik model? I can't recommend Mikrotik because I don't have any working experience with them. I only mentioned them as an example - other OEMs are availabl

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-19 Thread Matt Jolly
On 20/5/25 09:55, whiteman808 wrote: Can you recommend some Mikrotik model? Really it's going to come down to what your requirements are and how much you want to spend. Get something with sufficient ports for your current requirements and any (near) future expansion. Don't spend money on things

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-19 Thread whiteman808
Can you recommend some Mikrotik model? I have an 8 Gbps optical fiber network, 8 Gbps download / 2 Gbps upload and I've started building my budget homelab. I plan to expand my network to support 10 Gbps Ethernet in the far future so router should have one 10 Gbps Ethernet port. I'll need to connec

Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13

2025-05-19 Thread Michael
On Tuesday, 20 May 2025 00:00:35 British Summer Time Eli Schwartz wrote: > On 5/19/25 6:27 PM, Michael wrote: > > No buildpkg on this system. :-( > > Gentoo provides a large (45 gb) public buildpkg cache at > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_Binary_Host_Quickstart > > >> I'm not sure how to >

Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13

2025-05-19 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 5/19/25 6:27 PM, Michael wrote: > No buildpkg on this system. :-( Gentoo provides a large (45 gb) public buildpkg cache at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_Binary_Host_Quickstart >> I'm not sure how to >> fix that. Basically, portage stores data on what is installed in /var >> but the p

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-19 Thread Michael
On Monday, 19 May 2025 23:35:02 British Summer Time Matt Jolly wrote: > Hi, > > > I want to install and configure on it GNU/Linux or OpenBSD so that this > > computer will serve as router > > > > Is it a good hardware for that purpose? > > Honestly, it's likely that even those specs are overkill

Re: [gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-19 Thread Matt Jolly
Hi, I want to install and configure on it GNU/Linux or OpenBSD so that this computer will serve as router Is it a good hardware for that purpose? Honestly, it's likely that even those specs are overkill for the intended purpose - compare to your bog-standard AIO modem/router which likely uses

Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13

2025-05-19 Thread Michael
On Monday, 19 May 2025 14:17:49 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > Michael wrote: > > Just as I was celebrating the last python upgrade has been a breeze, a > > disk > > failed on one PC in the most inopportune moment. The / directory was on > > the SSD disk which failed. The /var/db, /var/cache a

[gentoo-user] Recommended hardware for router

2025-05-19 Thread whiteman808
Hello, I have a computer with the following specs: Motherboard: ASRock QC5000M Micro ATX RAM: 8 GB DDR3 A cheap working 128 GB SSD available in the store Integrated AMD Radeon HD 8330 Graphics Power supply: Seasonic Ssp-350St2 Bulk 350W, Pc Power Supply (SSP350ST2) AMD FT3 Kabini A4-5050/5000 Qua

[gentoo-user] Permission error when trying to rsync over nfs

2025-05-19 Thread Dale
Howdy, I'm wanting to move a Data partition over to a new set of drives that are encrypted.  I decided the easiest way to do this is to put the new drives on the NAS box and mount them like I do when I backup my large Video directory only copy the Data files instead.  So, on the NAS box, I set up

Re: [gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13

2025-05-19 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > Just as I was celebrating the last python upgrade has been a breeze, a disk > failed on one PC in the most inopportune moment. The / directory was on the > SSD disk which failed. The /var/db, /var/cache and /var/log are on a > different (spinning) disk. > > I restored / from a

[gentoo-user] Expand host name for all subdomains except primary domain name

2025-05-19 Thread whiteman808
Hello, I'm configuring dnsmasq for virtual machines and have no idea how can I configure dnsmasq to exclude primary domain name from expanding its name. I have a domain rpk.lan, which is the PC running VMs, and virtual machines have set accordingly following domains: vm1.rpk.lan, vm2.rpk.lan and

[gentoo-user] Filesystem with python3_12, but /var/db,cache with python3_13

2025-05-19 Thread Michael
Just as I was celebrating the last python upgrade has been a breeze, a disk failed on one PC in the most inopportune moment. The / directory was on the SSD disk which failed. The /var/db, /var/cache and /var/log are on a different (spinning) disk. I restored / from a backup which was 5 weeks

Re: [gentoo-user] Removing LVM from disk, or disks, and being like new drives again.

2025-05-19 Thread byte . size226
Dale wrote: I'm not necessarily needing to use shred or dd everything to make sure data can never be recovered, just reset to like new so I can start clean with a fresh new setup. <>> What is the fastest way In that scenario I would simply use gdisk (sys-apps/ gptfdisk). When you open the dri

Re: [gentoo-user] kioworker segfault error SOLVED

2025-05-18 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: > > OK.  Between the two posts, I did the following.  I found out that > libxcb.so.1.1.0 belongs to x11-libs/libxcb so I reemerged it.  I also > got lucky when I did a ps aux and caught a kioworker process running > which gave me the path.  I couldn't do that the other day which made me

[gentoo-user] Removing LVM from disk, or disks, and being like new drives again.

2025-05-18 Thread Dale
Howdy, As most likely know, I use LVM a lot.  I'm about to rework a set of drives and when done, I need to remove everything from the drives and reset them to like new.  No data, no LVM, no partitions or anything on them.  I'm not necessarily needing to use shred or dd everything to make sure data

Re: [gentoo-user] Fragile python update is wedged.

2025-05-18 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > On Saturday, 17 May 2025 08:17:34 British Summer Time Dale wrote: >> Dale wrote: >>> SNIP >>> Oh, tried to do the last step on my main rig, emerge spit out a nice >>> loud and hard to miss, NO!!!. There's still a lot of packages not ready >>> for python 3.13 yet. Maybe

Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-18 Thread Dale
byte.size...@simplelogin.com wrote: > Dale wrote: >> Do you have a link, or several links, on how to set that up?  I'd >> like to read it and may even play with it on one of my old rigs, then >> maybe on my main rig at some point. > > I don't think I have any step-by-step resources at hand but I ca

Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-18 Thread byte . size226
Dale wrote: Do you have a link, or several links, on how to set that up?  I'd like to read it and may even play with it on one of my old rigs, then maybe on my main rig at some point. I don't think I have any step-by-step resources at hand but I can outline a general "recipe" if that helps.

Re: [gentoo-user] Fragile python update is wedged.

2025-05-18 Thread Michael
On Saturday, 17 May 2025 08:17:34 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > Dale wrote: > > SNIP > > Oh, tried to do the last step on my main rig, emerge spit out a nice > > loud and hard to miss, NO!!!. There's still a lot of packages not ready > > for python 3.13 yet. Maybe next week. If I d

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-18 Thread Richard Freeman
On 5/17/2025 8:43 AM, Rahul Sandhu wrote: Hi, You may want to look into TPM2-based disk encryption; during normal operation it's basically transparent. My servers all have an encrypted root partition, and I do not need to enter a password to boot it as the decryption keys are stored in the TPM.

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-17 Thread Grant Taylor
On 5/17/25 3:04 AM, Wol wrote: I believe modern hardware will automatically encrypt the disk and store the key in the TPM. At BIOS level. So that disk is only readable on that computer. Some systems have that capability. But all of the systems that I've looked at don't enable it automaticall

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-17 Thread Rahul Sandhu
Hi, You may want to look into TPM2-based disk encryption; during normal operation it's basically transparent. My servers all have an encrypted root partition, and I do not need to enter a password to boot it as the decryption keys are stored in the TPM. Take a look at this page[1] for information

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-17 Thread Dale
byte.size...@simplelogin.com wrote: > There are always advantages of having FDE, including when a theft > occurs. While ofc FDE will not protect against theft, at least the > data on the drive(s) will be secure. > > If you're "hosting" other people's data, I think this there's even > more good reas

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-17 Thread byte . size226
Are there any advantages from putting Linux on encrypted root at bare metal server There are always advantages of having FDE, including when a theft occurs. While ofc FDE will not protect against theft, at least the data on the drive(s) will be secure. If you're "hosting" other people's d

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-17 Thread Wol
On 17/05/2025 03:06, Grant Taylor wrote: Are you worried about disk theft or system theft? The former is easier to protect against than the latter. I believe modern hardware will automatically encrypt the disk and store the key in the TPM. At BIOS level. So that disk is only readable on that

Re: [gentoo-user] Fragile python update is wedged.

2025-05-17 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: > SNIP > Oh, tried to do the last step on my main rig, emerge spit out a nice > loud and hard to miss, NO!!!.  There's still a lot of packages not ready > for python 3.13 yet.  Maybe next week.  If I don't forget.  Again.  > > Dale > > :-)  :-)  > Little update.  I just went

Re: [gentoo-user] kioworker segfault error

2025-05-16 Thread Dale
Mark Knecht wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 3:33 PM Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I was looking at messages and ran up on this error. This is on my new >> rig, Gentoo-1. >> >> >> >> May 16 17:20:16 Gentoo-1 kernel: kioworker[3084]: segfault at 0 ip >> 7f95f17510e8 sp 7ffe1b492d50 error 4 i

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-16 Thread Grant Taylor
On 5/16/25 11:59 AM, whiteman808 wrote: Hello, Hi, Are there any advantages from putting Linux on encrypted root at bare metal server ... I think so. But I've not yet done it myself. I've only used LUKS for a data file system. ... if I often access remotely server from ssh, and sometim

Re: [gentoo-user] kioworker segfault error

2025-05-16 Thread Mark Knecht
On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 3:33 PM Dale wrote: > > Howdy, > > I was looking at messages and ran up on this error. This is on my new > rig, Gentoo-1. > > > > May 16 17:20:16 Gentoo-1 kernel: kioworker[3084]: segfault at 0 ip > 7f95f17510e8 sp 7ffe1b492d50 error 4 in > libxcb.so.1.1.0[7f95f174

Re: [gentoo-user] kioworker segfault error

2025-05-16 Thread Nate Eldredge
I believe the "segfault at" messages are emitted by the kernel when a *userspace* process segfaults (possibly only when it's owned by root or otherwise seems important). If a kernel thread had crashed, I think you'd see an OOPS instead. kioworker, despite its name, isn't a kernel process. My

[gentoo-user] kioworker segfault error

2025-05-16 Thread Dale
Howdy, I was looking at messages and ran up on this error.  This is on my new rig, Gentoo-1. May 16 17:20:16 Gentoo-1 kernel: kioworker[3084]: segfault at 0 ip 7f95f17510e8 sp 7ffe1b492d50 error 4 in libxcb.so.1.1.0[7f95f174f000+15000] likely on CPU 15 (core 7, socket 0) May 16 17:20:16

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-16 Thread Dale
Richard Freeman wrote: > On 5/16/2025 12:59 PM, whiteman808 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Are there any advantages from putting Linux on encrypted root at bare >> metal server if I often access remotely server from ssh, and >> sometimes need to reboot it? What about key supplied during unlocking >> server

Re: [gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-16 Thread Richard Freeman
On 5/16/2025 12:59 PM, whiteman808 wrote: Hello, Are there any advantages from putting Linux on encrypted root at bare metal server if I often access remotely server from ssh, and sometimes need to reboot it? What about key supplied during unlocking server after reboot or manually power on? G

[gentoo-user] Benefits from full disk encryption on server?

2025-05-16 Thread whiteman808
Hello, I'm going to run on my server a few services for me and friends like static HTML pages, gitea, jabber server, and mailing lists. Are there any advantages from putting Linux on encrypted root at bare metal server if I often access remotely server from ssh, and sometimes need to reboot it?

Re: [gentoo-user] Bump mysql plz!

2025-05-14 Thread Matt Jolly
seems, upstream has 8.0.42. Again, please log a bug for this. Developers, maintainers, and contributors rely on the bug tracker, not mailing list monitoring, to address package issues. Finally, I need to address your signature. It is not appropriate for the gentoo-user mailing list. Please c

Re: [gentoo-user] Bump mysql plz!

2025-05-14 Thread Dale
Nate Eldredge wrote: > On May 14, 2025, at 13:53, Alan Grimes wrote: >> MySQL has ver 8.7 upstream (8.0 in gentoo) > No 8.7 shown at https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/, but there is 8.4.5. > There's an open pull request from today: > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/34267 > > I'm sure

Re: [gentoo-user] Bump mysql plz!

2025-05-14 Thread Nate Eldredge
On May 14, 2025, at 13:53, Alan Grimes wrote: > > MySQL has ver 8.7 upstream (8.0 in gentoo) No 8.7 shown at https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/, but there is 8.4.5. There's an open pull request from today: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/34267 I'm sure they'd be happy to have teste

[gentoo-user] Bump mysql plz!

2025-05-14 Thread Alan Grimes
MySQL has ver 8.7 upstream (8.0 in gentoo) also MySQL workbench (8.0.41) does not build, python incompatibility it seems, upstream has 8.0.42. -- You can't out-crazy a Democrat. WhY aRe ThEy KiLlInG tEh ChIcKeNs? White is the new Kulak. Powers are not rights.

Re: [gentoo-user] Cat a binary = system crash?

2025-05-13 Thread Mitchell Dorrell
Brief follow up: Since the other day, my system has been showing other symptoms of a buggy/unstable GPU driver, but I will still attempt to reproduce the crash (perhaps this weekend) for good measure. -MD

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM and making /var larger, file system won't resize.

2025-05-13 Thread Dale
Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Sun, May 11, 2025 at 09:39:22AM -0500 schrieb Dale: > Am I going to have to boot other media and resize this thing >>> Since /var/ is in use by the OS and you keep getting warnings about it >>> being >>> busy, I think you'll have to reboot with a LiveUSB t

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM and making /var larger, file system won't resize.

2025-05-13 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Sun, May 11, 2025 at 09:39:22AM -0500 schrieb Dale: > >> Am I going to have to boot other media and resize this thing > > Since /var/ is in use by the OS and you keep getting warnings about it > > being > > busy, I think you'll have to reboot with a LiveUSB to finish this job with > > v

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM and making /var larger, file system won't resize.

2025-05-13 Thread Frank Steinmetzger
Am Sun, May 11, 2025 at 02:21:07PM +0100 schrieb Michael: > Hmm ... the fine manual of resize2fs command states upfront: > > "The resize2fs program will resize ext2, ext3, or ext4 file systems. It can > be used to enlarge or shrink an unmounted file system located on device. If > the file sy

Re: [gentoo-user] New hard drive. Is this normal? It looks like a connect problem.

2025-05-13 Thread Michael
On Monday, 12 May 2025 23:34:36 British Summer Time Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Wed, May 07, 2025 at 09:18:16AM +0100 schrieb Michael: > > On Wednesday, 7 May 2025 00:30:34 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > > > […] > > > I ran a hdparm test. I wanted to see as accurately as I could what the > >

Re: [gentoo-user] New hard drive. Is this normal? It looks like a connect problem.

2025-05-12 Thread Dale
Michael wrote: > On Monday, 12 May 2025 09:11:54 British Summer Time Dale wrote: > >> I'm thinking about adding this to my backup drive set. With this >> addition, I can have one backup for all my videos instead of breaking it >> into two pieces. >> >> Any concerns with the data you see? Would y

Re: [gentoo-user] New hard drive. Is this normal? It looks like a connect problem.

2025-05-12 Thread Dale
Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Wed, May 07, 2025 at 09:18:16AM +0100 schrieb Michael: >> On Wednesday, 7 May 2025 00:30:34 British Summer Time Dale wrote: >>> […] >>> I ran a hdparm test. I wanted to see as accurately as I could what the >>> speed was. I got this. >>> >>> >>> >>> root@nas ~ # hdp

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >