Re: [gentoo-user] OT - which X terminal do you use?

On Tuesday 09 May 2006 11:33 am, Neil Bothwick wrote: > I am writing a comparative review of a number of X terminals, so I > thought I'd draw on the collective wisdom of this list. which are your > most/least favourite X terminals, and why? I love YaKuake. It's better than Kuake in that it's just

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: OT - which X terminal do you use?

On Tuesday 09 May 2006 02:41 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Samuel Baldwin wrote: > > Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> That's something I'll never understand - why make the text on > >> a terminal harder to read, by using transparency? > >> Granted, it'll look better, but that's it. > >> IMO transpare

Re: [gentoo-user] Bad mem, over heat and games

On Friday 05 May 2006 09:06 pm, JimD wrote: > Ok, this is a three part question. I am on "vacation" and I am using my > wife's laptop that used to have winxp and now has Gentoo. Starting > today I started to get garbled video output followed by a lock-up. I > have been using the laptop as my de

Re: [gentoo-user] Waaaaaay [OT] Windoze back-up. Sorry to ask. :-(

On Wednesday 03 May 2006 07:58 pm, Teresa and Dale wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Set up a Samba server... hmm... KDE Control Centre has a excellent > > interface for that. Very easy. > > > >In a related story... > > > >The first time I used Samba to do some network transfers I spent ten >

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:27 pm, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:02:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote > > > > And I recommend that you do *not* set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 unless you > > > are prepared for the consequences. > > > > WHAT CONSEQUENCES!? > > > > I've asked on multipl

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Thursday 04 May 2006 04:42 am, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Monday 01 May 2006 11:51 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > > On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:18, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > > > CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Monday 01 May 2006 10:57 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sunday 30 April 2006 05:59 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> wu chuanwen wrote: > >> > >> Not really. > > > > You most likely either have a faster machine > > Celeron M Notebook with 1.5 GHz. Not what I'd call fa

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Monday 01 May 2006 11:14 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:21 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> Kesara Rathnayake wrote: > >> > I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we > >> > used today. > >> > >> To find out, I aske

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 06:05 am, Tero Grundström wrote: > On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, wu chuanwen wrote: > > Hi! Everybody! > > I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In > > my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck > > and even can not scroll up

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Monday 01 May 2006 11:03 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Monday 01 May 2006 07:55 am, Justin Patrin wrote: > >> On 4/30/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Kesara Rathnayake wrote: > >> (I hate HTML mailand I hate Outlook even more.) > > > > Out

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Monday 01 May 2006 10:50 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sunday 30 April 2006 08:47 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: > >> wu chuanwen wrote: > >> > 2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > that is (AFAIK) just a layer below TCP/IP. > > Wrong. Besides: "just a laye

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 09:34 am, Richard Fish wrote: > On 5/1/06, Farhan Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you wish to have latest packages, change ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86", it > > might make your system a bit unstable but going through my experience it > > has not broken a thing in my system.

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Monday 01 May 2006 11:51 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:18, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > > CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden" > > no, just no. This breaks enough stuff. Do not tell others to use it. If you > want to use it. Fine. But do not tell anybody e

Re: [gentoo-user] Waaaaaay [OT] Windoze back-up. Sorry to ask. :-(

On Tuesday 02 May 2006 02:18 pm, Teresa and Dale wrote: > Hi, > > OK, here's my deal. My girlfriend wants to use windoze, yes it has > already died from a bug and it took a while to get it all back to > working, again. This is what I want to do to make it easy when this > happens again, this is w

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Monday 01 May 2006 04:32 pm, Farhan Ahmed wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > (snip) > > > > > These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order: > > > > > > Calculating dependencies ...done! > > > [ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 [1.0.7-r4] -debug > > > +gnome > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Monday 01 May 2006 07:55 am, Justin Patrin wrote: > On 4/30/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kesara Rathnayake wrote: > > PS: I begin to hate Googlemail because of the default to use HTML > > even if it is not required. Sucks. Big time. > > It may "default" to HTML now, as do Y

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Sunday 30 April 2006 07:22 am, Jeff Rollin wrote: > Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo > till I added USE="-DG_DISABLE_DEBUG" So, this is going to be a very elementary question, but it's honestly because I don't know. I have major problems with Firefox

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Sunday 30 April 2006 08:47 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: > wu chuanwen wrote: > > 2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >: > > > > Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when > > you run > > > > emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox > >

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:21 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Kesara Rathnayake wrote: > > I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we > > used today. > > To find out, I asked OP to create a blank profile. I also assume > a local problem at his side. OP should simply create

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Sunday 30 April 2006 05:59 am, Alexander Skwar wrote: > wu chuanwen wrote: > > Hi! Everybody! > > I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow? Yes. > Not really. You most likely either have a faster machine or have already tweaked yours. > > In > > my machine,if i op

Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?

On Sunday 30 April 2006 01:11 pm, Jeff Rollin wrote: > I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it > improves the speed of KDE applications too So, can you please tell me how to do this? I'd really appreciate it. > -

Re: [gentoo-user] GnuPG Trouble - Found Problem, Need Solution

On Tuesday 25 April 2006 08:16 am, Daniel da Veiga wrote: > On 4/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > More news: > > > > I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose. > > Configuration. > > > > I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg

Re: [gentoo-user] GnuPG Trouble - Found Problem, Need Solution

More news: I successfully got GnuPG 1.9 installed, and then a new problem arose. Configuration. I went to http://kmail.kde.org/kmail-pgpmime-howto.html#gnupg and followed the instructions to the best of my ability, and yet I still get this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.gnupg $ eval "$(gpg-agent --dae

Re: [gentoo-user] GnuPG Trouble - Found Problem, Need Solution

On Sunday 23 April 2006 02:17 pm, Mick wrote: > On 23/04/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've been trying to find why I am unable to use GnuPG-agent to sign my > > messages in KMail, and rather have to type in a password in all the time > > through KGPG. The problem is that t

Re: [gentoo-user] GnuPG Trouble - Found Problem, Need Solution

On Monday 24 April 2006 02:42 pm, Abhay Kedia wrote: > On Sunday 23 April 2006 11:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is > > version 1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9 > > The main problem is that gpg-agent has been "Package Masked

Re: [gentoo-user] GnuPG Trouble - Found Problem, Need Solution

On Sunday 23 April 2006 10:39 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 1) Download version 1.9 from GnuPG's website and install it. > > GnuPG 1.9 is in ~x86. If you add it to your keywords file, you'll > get it. Where is my keywords file? I'm still extremely new to portage in ge

Re: [gentoo-user] What's broken with portage now?

On Monday 24 April 2006 05:01 am, Mick wrote: > On 23/04/06, Glenn Enright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 24 April 2006 9:11 am, Mick wrote: > > > If I were to delete something it has to be the lot. Which directory > > > am I supposed to rm? > > > > Before you do that try emerge metadata

Re: [gentoo-user] What's broken with portage now?

On Sunday 23 April 2006 01:08 pm, Mick wrote: > On 23/04/06, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I run eix-sync instead. I just ran it with no problems here. > > > > Hope this helps, > > Mark > > Sorry, I should have said, I ran eix-sync -v first and after a little > while I also tried to ru

[gentoo-user] GnuPG Trouble - Found Problem, Need Solution

I've been trying to find why I am unable to use GnuPG-agent to sign my messages in KMail, and rather have to type in a password in all the time through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is version 1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9 I don't think it wise to change to

Re: [gentoo-user] kgpg error with gpg-agent

On Monday 17 April 2006 02:52 pm, Mike Williams wrote: > On Monday 17 April 2006 18:26, Mick wrote: > > I seem to have something wrong with the gpg-agent setup on by box. > > First of all gpg-agent does not start automatically despite the fact > > that I have added eval "$(gpg-agent --daemon)" in m

Re: [gentoo-user] kgpg error with gpg-agent

On Monday 17 April 2006 10:26 am, Mick wrote: > Hi All, > > I seem to have something wrong with the gpg-agent setup on by box. > First of all gpg-agent does not start automatically despite the fact > that I have added eval "$(gpg-agent --daemon)" in my ~/.xsession file. I'm having a similar proble

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how to setup sun-jdk

On Sunday 16 April 2006 08:51 pm, wu chuanwen wrote: > Oh,God!Now i know the problem.My usbdisk is broken.So the file every time i > read from it is corrucpted althougth the file i download is OK. Hah! That's really funny! I remeber once I burned out a SD Card since I was using the same address

Re: [gentoo-user] X11 + framebuffer - does it work?

On Saturday 15 April 2006 07:55 pm, Richard Fish wrote: > On 4/15/06, Rohit and Bhavana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is there anyone on the list who has the following configured on their > > workstations? > > > > * bootsplash giving them a nice picture at the startup [ in runlevel

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how to setup sun-jdk

On Saturday 15 April 2006 11:30 pm, wu chuanwen wrote: > The package dose not mention it's Multi-language package or not.The > name of package is "Linux self-extracting file".And i notice that the > package for Windows mentions that it's Multi-language package. > Does it matter if it'a Multi-langua

Re: [gentoo-user] Eclipse IDE For Java

On Saturday 15 April 2006 09:11 am, Tristan Mills wrote: > Lord Sauron wrote: > > Hi, once again... > > > > I'm taking a Computer Science class in school, and they use Java for > > this class. I decided to try using Eclipse, a popular Java IDE, > > however, Eclipse appears to be masked (see # emer

Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages

On Friday 14 April 2006 11:21 pm, Rumen Yotov wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Friday 14 April 2006 02:36 pm, Ralph Slooten wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> I did. However, I sent the key anyway so that you don't have to go > >>> hunting for which keyservers I was able to use. S

Re: [gentoo-user] I'd really like to stay with you

On Friday 14 April 2006 02:11 pm, Franta wrote: > ... but THIS is impossible > hope I've copied it right ... then goes the REALLY > upgrade .. > All of X blocks all and everything of X. That's really amazing. That's > what I ever wanted Linux to be!!! > Th

Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages

On Friday 14 April 2006 01:45 pm, Teresa and Dale wrote: > Ralph Slooten wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I did. However, I sent the key anyway so that you don't have to go > > > > hunting > > > > >for which keyservers I was able to use. Some of them didn't work. I'll > > >re-try later,

Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages

On Friday 14 April 2006 02:36 pm, Ralph Slooten wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I did. However, I sent the key anyway so that you don't have to go > > hunting for which keyservers I was able to use. Some of them didn't > > work. I'll re-try later, but right now there's a few (about two or

Re: [gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages

On Friday 14 April 2006 12:13 pm, Rumen Yotov wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I did some homework, did some Google searches, and figured out how to > > sign my email with Kgpg. I configured KMail, during which I came to the > > conclusion that spamassassin needs to be left serverside - impor

[gentoo-user] Now Signing Messages

I did some homework, did some Google searches, and figured out how to sign my email with Kgpg. I configured KMail, during which I came to the conclusion that spamassassin needs to be left serverside - importing ~8,000 messages from GMail while spamassassin tried to scan them all was an absolute