RE: [gentoo-user] Updating system problem

2009-03-02 Thread Prado, Renato (R.P.)
>From: Prado, Renato (R.P.) [mailto:rpr...@visteon.com] >Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 3:23 PM >To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Updating system problem >Did you try "equery depends apache2" Sorry for top posting :-(

RE: [gentoo-user] Updating system problem

2009-03-02 Thread Prado, Renato (R.P.)
Did you try "equery depends apache2" From: TĂșlio Henrique Alves dos Santos [mailto:tulio...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 3:01 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Updating system problem Hi folks, I trying to update one s

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's advantage: 'optimized for yoursystem' -- huh?

2009-02-04 Thread Prado, Renato (R.P.)
>Unless you mean a different thing, that can be achieved and >is already done in some packages. For example, mplayer has a >USE flag called custom-cflags which freely allow you to break >it as much as you want. What I meant was something like this: supposed that the maintainer of a particular pack

RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's advantage: "optimized for yoursystem" -- huh?

2009-02-04 Thread Prado, Renato (R.P.)
> My question can be put like this: Do binary distro's per package > optimiziations override the benefit of having arch specific > optimiziations that gentoo allows? Thinking about that... I guess a could future for future portage releases would be a USE flag the overrides the system's CFLAGS (besi