Nilesh Govindrajan writes:
> My question is which load average it checks? I'm assuming it checks
> for the 15 minute average?
I certainly don't know much about C, but from me grepping the source of
make, it seems that job.c does "getloadavg (&load, 1)". Moreover "man
getloadavg" says that the '1'
"Nicolas Richard" writes:
> I don't understand where sudo finds the value for the PATH env
> variable.
Finally, I found where the problem lied. Recall that my problem was the
following : I had a path in `sudo env | grep ^PATH' which did not seem
to originate from
Pandu Poluan writes:
> Maybe it's building the PATH not explicitly... something like :
>
> PATH="$PATH;/usr/local/texlive/$SOME_VARIABLE/and/so/forth"
>
> Try grepping for "texlive/\$"
I tried, but the results are always pointing to the (correct) 2012
version.
I paste the result hereunder just
Pandu Poluan writes:
> A bit desperate, but try :
>
> grep -R "texlive/2011" /etc/*
I tried that already
youngfrog@geodiff-mac3 ~ $ sudo grep -r texlive/2011 /etc
youngfrog@geodiff-mac3 ~ $ sudo grep -r texlive/2011 ~root
/root/.bash_history:cd /usr/local/texlive/2011
/root/.bash_history:grep t
Joost Roeleveld writes:
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 04:57:50 PM Nicolas Richard wrote:
>> In my homedir:
>> .bash_profile loads .bashrc
>> .bashrc says export PATH="~/bin/overrideglobal:${PATH}:~/bin" (and
>> defines some aliases)
>
> Does it load
> "Joost" == J Roeleveld writes:
Joost> And, what is in the .bash_profile and .bashrc files in your
Joost> homedir and in root's homedir?
In my homedir:
.bash_profile loads .bashrc
.bashrc says export PATH="~/bin/overrideglobal:${PATH}:~/bin" (and
defines some aliases)
In root's: I h
>>>>> "Joost" == J Roeleveld writes:
Joost> Nicolas Richard wrote:
>> Here is the output of the relevant (at least I thought they were)
>> commands. Can somebody explain to me why I still have
>> /usr/local/texlive/*2011*/bin/i386-li
Hi everybody,
I don't understand where sudo finds the value for the PATH env variable.
Here is the output of the relevant (at least I thought they were)
commands. Can somebody explain to me why I still have
/usr/local/texlive/*2011*/bin/i386-linux in the first sudo output ? I
don't get it, and d
Le 01/06/10 13:04, Neil Bothwick a écrit :
> equery check --only-failures '*'
Note: the local option --only-failures seems not available in the
current stable version of gentoolkit.
> Note that it will show failures on any files that have been modified
> since installation, such as configuration
Le 03/04/10 09:34, Roger Cahn a écrit :
> (process:5573): Gtk-WARNING**: locale not supported by C library.
> Using the fallback 'C' locale.
Any similar message if you simple run "gedit" ? What's the output of
"locale -a", and of "locale" ?
Btw, did you need to install/modify anything to get the p
> Hm. I'm not sure what you are asking.
It was unclear, but you answered the question indirectly.
Thanks,
Nico.
Le 10/03/10 17:08, walt a écrit :
> On 03/10/2010 03:03 AM, Nicolas Richard wrote:
>> So the general question is : if I want to use git-bisect (I have never
>> done that before, but today is a good time to try),
>
> It's a great tool and easy to use once you've lea
Hello,
Background info : I'm experiencing a bug and found out that the bug
doesn't appear with libdrm-2.4.11 (I kept an ebuild for this one in
/usr/local/portage/...), but it does occur with libdrm-2.4.13 (not sure
about the version numbers anymore, and I have yet to try 2.4.12, too,
but that's no
13 matches
Mail list logo