as is provided by
CMAN, Pacemaker.
What has worked really solid for us due to many factors, and the idea of
being able to build everything from the ground up
is Gentoo, with Pacemaker, GFS, and DRBD. This is for our failover system.
Kind Regards,
Nick from Toronto.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at
Gentoo minimal and unetbootin:
http://programminglinuxblog.blogspot.ca/2011/02/gentoo-on-usb-stick.html#!/2011/02/gentoo-on-usb-stick.html
Not sure if pdflatex uses Java too however that is what I use.
What you gents are talking about it stonith. At the UPS and Host
level, it's everything off or everything on. If you like individual
STONITH per host, it's been a while however, this is done at the PDU
and Host level. As for VM, I use Xen, and there we use libvirt and/or
fence_virt.
There we have
please read the news it's a must. If your network card drivers are
built as modules ''in theory'' you are not effected. If they are built
into the kernel, you will have to delete a 70- something file, and
replace it with an 80- something empty file, to keep the same ethN
wlanN names. Sorry, i do no
Anyone using Hadoop for managing virtual machines and/or drives.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Hello Norman,
Sorry for the delayed response
>> What do you mean by replication?
Oh I was referring to the replication of the entire NFS server with virtual
drive images etc.. to other machines for fail over, maybe load balancing.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
ally starts to shine.
WOW, from NAS to SAN?
Kind Regards,
Nick.
t would be interesting in knowing are handling the said, and also felxable
way of backing up
of virutal storage drives, snapshots etc...
Kind Regards,
Nick.
ut your SAN setup
in respect to HBA, raid adapters, software etc... I understand that you
could be using a black box from HP etc.., but just a general idea.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
>
> Hello Nick,
>
> the question is, what are you doing with it and why do you think you
> need a fibre channel SAN.
> Our goal indeed is to get rid of the SAN infrastructure as it is
> delicately to all kinds of failure with nearly zero fault tolerance.
> An example, you
,
Nick.
And who says you can't teach an old man new tricks huh geezer ;)?
Thank you so much for your response!!! That sorts out outgoing
traffic, have you had to setup rules for incoming traffic? I mean
from the outside world to a server for example?
Kind Regards,
Nick.
By downstream, I mean within our own network. Obviously downstream LB
from the ISP's DSLAM would be impossible without MLPP, BGP support...
N
Sorry for the top post.
N.
, maybe the session would suffice (i.e,
per network session)?
Although per packet would be preferred.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
On 5/26/13, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 26 May 2013 22:35:14 J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> > On 25 May 2013, at 22:26, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> >> ... As mentioned
Any different if the links are VDSL? I have little experience in
working with DSL based connections, and was wondering what was
possible in terms or bridging/bonding etc.. if anything.
N.
On 5/25/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> I missed out some crusial info in my last email. As mentioned this
>
, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am looking to put together a linux router for small business, and
> was wondering if there was anything the suite (using quagga etc..)
> that would allow for load balancing of regular dsl links. Kind of like
> cisco with fast ethernet
could be balanced, it would be great!
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Neal,
As for the --sport flag for OUTPUT, should it not be left arbitrary?
The SSH daemon should use unprivileged ports between 1024 and 65535.
The only daemon I know thus far that does not is NTP which is
hardwired to 123 both ways.
Thanks Guys,
Nick.
Hello Everyone,
Thank you so much for your responses. I agree Alan, total pain in the
neck!!! But it's a ticket that was passed down to me. We moved the
stateful firewalls inside the network, broken down to each department.
But as a first on site defense on our BGP router running Quagga, we
only
j REJECT --reject-with tcp-rst
$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -o $INTIF1 -p udp -j REJECT --reject-with
icmp-port-unreachable
#echo -e " - Dropping input traffic to remaining protocols sent
to closed ports"
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -i $INTIF1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-proto-unreachable
#echo -e " - Dropping output traffic to remaining protocols sent
to closed ports"
$IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -o $INTIF1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-proto-unreachable
Kind Regards,
Nick.
- Dropping input traffic to remaining protocols sent
to closed ports"
-A INPUT -i $INTIF1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-proto-unreachable
#echo -e " - Dropping output traffic to remaining protocols sent
to closed ports"
-A OUTPUT -o $INTIF1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-proto-unreachable
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
For testing purposes I changed the ssh rule to:
-A TCP -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A TCP -p tcp -m tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d 192.168.2.5 --dport 22 -j DROP
And still no go. As mentioned before, everything works fine until I
try to close up the rest of the ports not opened up in the chains
"UDP"
# $IPTABLES -A OUTPUT -o $INTIF1 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-proto-unreachable
Everything works fine with the REJECT rules commented out, but when
included SSH access is blocked out. Not sure why, isn't the sequence
correct (i.e., the ACCPET entries before the DROP and REJECT)?
Also, any pointers or heads up when going stateless would be greatly
appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Nick
Please forgive me! Gmail client from hell!
I just realized that we were running 3.5.7 on the older systems, and
the current version is 3.7.10. Would I be cutting too many corners to
copy over the ..config from the older machine.
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
On 5/12/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Thank you!!!
>
> On 5/12/13, staticsa
Thank you!!!
On 5/12/13, staticsafe wrote:
> On 5/11/2013 20:39, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Just running an installation on another IBM machine, and wanted to know
>> which kernel config files can we copy over from one machine to another,
>> an
Thanks yet again Michael! Enjoy your weekend.
N.
On 5/11/13, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 05/11/2013 03:13 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Our service provider requires all connections between us be done
>> through IPSec IKE. From the little bit of resear
like to run make and make modules_install on the new machine.
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
kernel modules, ipsec-tools and iptables, we see that as
keeping it simple and effective.
Your insight, suggested how-to pages are greatly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
Hello Andrea,
Thank you so much for your time. I missed the part about log^2 in the
documentation.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
On 5/10/13, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On May 10, 2013 5:23 PM, "Andrea Conti" wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> > server tick.nrc.ca minpoll
d it:
NTPD_OPTS="-u ntp:ntp"
I would have liked to be better prepared for this but the gentoo wiki
page has been down for a few weeks now. We are not looking for
microsecond synchronization however, down to the second would be nice!
Kind Regards,
Nick.
? Shoild "refid" not be pointing to our NTP server?
Your help is greatly appreciated,
Nick.
On 5/4/13, the guard wrote:
>
>
>
> Суббота, 4 мая 2013, 12:41 -04:00 от Nick Khamis :
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> While trying to include a logging chain to our IPTables rules, I am
>> receiving the following
>> error: (iptables: No chain/target/matc
We are using 3.3.8. I did see those in the kernel list. Anyone have
any idea which
ones are needed?
Thanks in Advance,
N.
On 5/4/13, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-05-04 12:41 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Some searching caused me to make sure that I have the correct modules
>> loaded:
6454 0
ipt_REJECT 1917 3
nf_conntrack_ipv4 9141 10 nf_nat,iptable_nat
nf_defrag_ipv4 847 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4
iptable_filter 988 1
ip_tables 8370 2 iptable_filter,iptable_nat
But still no go.
Thank in Advance,
Nick.
On 4/26/13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/04/2013 19:11, Nick Khamis wrote:
>>>> >> Thank you so much for your response, and I totally understand the
>>>> >> effort vs. benefit challenge. However, is it really that much
>>>> >> trouble/uns
On 4/26/13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/04/2013 17:54, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> On 4/26/13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>> On 26/04/2013 17:27, Nick Khamis wrote:
>>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the many solutions however, I am totally
On 4/26/13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 26/04/2013 17:27, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Thank you for the many solutions however, I am totally lost as to which
>> would
>> be most reliable in a collocation setting vs. office desktop. What we
>>
On 4/26/13, Jarry wrote:
> On 26-Apr-13 16:10, Joseph wrote:
>> On 04/25/13 10:33, Nick Khamis wrote:
>>>
>>> We are trying to sync our server's time with an accurate ntp
>>> server, and was wondering which of the many solutions are
>>> con
> Ummm... *all* servers are critically time-sensitive.
>
Yeah... I concur ;)
On 4/25/13, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 04/25/2013 10:33 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> We are trying to sync our server's time with an accurate ntp
>> server, and was wondering which of the many solutions are
>> considered viable. I did see
Hello Everyone,
We are trying to sync our server's time with an accurate ntp
server, and was wondering which of the many solutions are
considered viable. I did see the
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Time_Synchronization.
Our services are quite time sensitive.
Thanks in Advance,
N.
Who's paying for this bandwith?
N.
On 4/24/13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:07:05 +0100, Stroller wrote:
>
>> > That only works on small systems. I have systems here where a 'du' on
>> > /home would take hours and produce massive IO wait, because there's so
>> > much data in the
Oooops, I meant option 3.1:
3.1 Create a new empty file:
touch /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules
and reboot. The kernel will rename the interfaces hopefully as they were
before.
N.
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> I went into the kernel, rebuilt it with no changes (network driver
still eth0...
N.
On 4/7/13, Michael Hampicke wrote:
> Am 07.04.2013 20:08, schrieb Nick Khamis:
>> For those that have an error compiling udev 200:
>>
>> # emerge -1 XML-Parser
>> # perl-cleaner --all
>>
>> There was not mention of this in the news. No
For those that have an error compiling udev 200:
# emerge -1 XML-Parser
# perl-cleaner --all
There was not mention of this in the news. Nor will the package pull
them in as a
dependency.
N.
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Is changing it back to eth0 and eth1 like pulling teeth?
>
> N
Is changing it back to eth0 and eth1 like pulling teeth?
N
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Ooops I should have been more specific the net cards are not esp5s0
> and esp6s0. And the drivers for the network cards are built as
> modules.
>
> N
>
> On 4/7/13, Tanstaafl wr
Ooops I should have been more specific the net cards are not esp5s0
and esp6s0. And the drivers for the network cards are built as
modules.
N
On 4/7/13, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-04-07 1:48 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> I just did got udev updated. Did all the steps in the news
:32, schrieb Nick Khamis:
>> No... I'm stumped. I really don't want it in there either... I will
>> attempt removing it once finished updating the system.
>>
>> N.
>>
>> On 4/7/13, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> Are you using 802.1x or wireless on that ma
/7/13, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2013-04-07 9:38 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we
>> should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked
>> away.
>
> Well, hopefully you learned a valuable le
On 4/7/13, Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 07 Apr 2013 17:00:24 Nick Khamis wrote:
>> >> You should do udev first, that way if it breaks you have the maximum
>> >> amount of time to get things working again. Not that I'm a
>> >> pessimist...
>> >&g
your help.
N.
On 4/7/13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:20:02 -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
>
>> I am upgrading each package (25) one by one, and leaving the meat and
>> potatoes (udev) for last. I am really sorry about the noise guys and
>> gals. It's be
outside of it being a hard dependency of some
> other package.
>
> On 04/07/2013 10:22 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Installing wpa_supplicant got the network scripts working again. Not
>> sure why. Does anyone know why we need wpa_supplication now?
>>
>> On 4/7/13, Nick Kha
Installing wpa_supplicant got the network scripts working again. Not
sure why. Does anyone know why we need wpa_supplication now?
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> I am upgrading each package (25) one by one, and leaving the meat and
> potatoes (udev) for last. I am really sorry abo
LDAP server.
N.
On 4/7/13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 09:38:23 -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
>
>> Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we
>> should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked
>> away. For some reason i
nt
>> $interface_name". If they're supposed to be statically configured, try
>> using ifconfig to configure them manually.
Now that I have internet connection, I am not sure what my line of
action should be.
N.
On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Double checking the ud
Double checking the udevd version we are running 171. Not sure if we
should be effected yet? I confess, I did a world upgrade and walked
away. For some reason it was stuck on ipr.h for some apache related
package, which was odd since apache is not installed on the machine.
I reset the system and po
t; udev's renaming entirely via the kernel command-line parameter? Because
> you've done some magic in /etc/udev/rules.d/?
>
> If the former, then OK, this is a different issue. If the latter, be
> aware that this isn't a supported configuration! You may very well have
&g
Can't do nothing right now, no network connection... Don't feel like
burning a livecd and chrooting to jail...
N.
On 4/6/13, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Apr 2013 22:35:22 -0400
> Nick Khamis wrote:
>> As for /sbin/ip. I have no such command.
>
> I'd
in multicast addresses, not unicast addresses. I presume you're
> trying to get your unicast addresses working properly.
>
> ifconfig -a
>
> On 04/06/2013 10:35 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Sorry I did mean /sbin/ip... Long day. Regardless, /sbin/ipmaddr does
>> now sho
to configure your interfaces' ipv4 settings.
>
> The culprit is almost certainly somewhere in one of these places, its
> lack of being in these places it part of your problem:
>
> /etc/conf.d/net
> /etc/init.d/net.*
> /etc/runlevels/*/net.*
>
> Otherwise, try those find/grep
Mol wrote:
> On 04/06/2013 08:53 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> I took a closer look at /etc/udev/70-something-rules-net and
>> /sys/class/net/eth0/ and all the ATTR (i.e., address, type, dev_id)
>> line up fine. I did not find a "name" file in /sys/class/net/eth0
>&
The problem with eudev is that we are using the hardened profile and not sure
if it is part of our source tree. Right now, I just would like to
pinpoint this stubborn
little issue
I just wanted to mention that name did not change. ifconfig eth0 still pulls up
the interface, and same for ifconf
fig eth0/1 and lo returns the interface
with no tx and rx traffic. And no ip address as set in conf.d/net.
Please help guys. Server room is numbing..
N.
On 4/6/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> In attempted to delete 70-something rules from /etc/udev/rules.d/ and
> it was recreated on bo
In attempted to delete 70-something rules from /etc/udev/rules.d/ and
it was recreated on boot with the same content. I don't think the
device got renamed since "ifconfig eth0" shows the correct info.
Your help is greatly appreciated,
N.
On 4/6/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Well I
13, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 06.04.2013 23:19, schrieb Nick Khamis:
>> Our net card was also build as a module Volker, did you include
>> your net driver for example in /etc/conf.d/modules?
>
> no
> I removed the 70-something rules, and did pretty much nothing els
Our net card was also build as a module Volker, did you include
your net driver for example in /etc/conf.d/modules?
N.
On 4/6/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> Oh dear what did I start!@!@! I'm sorry, I did not know this was a
> machine brewing. Don't follow the mailing list a
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
>> Am 06.04.2013 21:33, schrieb Mick:
>>> On Saturday 06 Apr 2013 20:03:15 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>>>> Am 06.04.2013 17:57, schrieb Alan Mackenzie:
>>>>> Hi, Nick.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 06
running back and forth from the servers and
typing the error message here. Did our configuration get switched to
IP6? These are our DB servers and why me!!! Why ME!
Your help is greatly appreciated,
Nick
ur help is greatly appreciated,
Nick.
Yeah these guys seem to think that our servers MUST run on the
hardened profile...
On 3/28/13, Dale wrote:
> Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hahahah udev hell!! I did go through that updating from 2.6 to 3.4.
>> That was quite an experience But for kernel 3.* has udev not been
>&
As mentioned earlier a temporary change of profile got me on my way
eselect profile set 0
env-update
eselect profile set 7
Moving forward... Thanks guys.
On 3/28/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> But we never changed our profile? Always running hardened server.
>
> N.
>
> On 3/28/13, Nic
But we never changed our profile? Always running hardened server.
N.
On 3/28/13, Nick Khamis wrote:
> I switched to the default profile from hardened:
>
> eselect profile list
> Available profile symlink targets:
> [1] default/linux/x86/13.0 *
>
> env-update
> !!!
/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/13.0/eapi'
>>> Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache...
And still can't update portage.
N.
On 3/28/13, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 01:43 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> First hickup
>>
>> emerge -puDN1 world
>> !!!
!!! configuration, you should revert back to the previous configuration.
!!! Allowed actions are limited to --help, --info, --search, --sync, and
We were always running hardened. Never changed the profile.
N.
On 3/28/13, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 01:16 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>&g
So basically, no long weekend for me here in Canada. Thanks a lot guys
for your time.Wish me luck. Happy easter/holidays!!!
N.
On 3/28/13, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 12:56 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hahahah udev hell!! I did go through that updating from 2.6 to 3.4.
&g
AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Just got a ticket assigned to me where we need to update our production
>> servers.
>>
>> uname -a
>> Linux noun 3.4.9-gentoo #2 SMP Sat Oct 13 09:35:07 EDT 2012 x86_64
>> Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz Gen
flags included.
Thanks again,
Nick.
On 3/28/13, Joshua Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Just got a ticket assigned to me where we need to update our production
>> servers.
>>
>> uname -a
>&
been updated since the initial install and
wanted to get a little feedback on some safe practices and methods
that should be performed before and while doing so.
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
Someone watched some news regarding HP moving towards ARM ;)
http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_19240331
Nick.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:07 PM, James wrote:
> So Sorry,
>
> I just think that in a few years, Gentoo will be more
> about ARM( 64 or 128 bit) than Intel...
>
/boot/kernel-2.6.36-native-r3 root=/dev/sda3
reboot
If this is a fresh install, make mistakes, break your environment,
chroot into jail...This
is the only cure for your condition.
Nick.
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Lavender <448463...@qq.com> wrote:
> It seems that no matter I build gent
rtbeat-3-0-STABLE-3.0.4/doc'
What provides xmlinclude?
Thanks in Advance,
Nick.
I'm going to state the obvious and say did you try to hold ALT during boot?
I made a systermrescue on USB stick and it works just fine on my MacBook.
I also have Gentoo installed with Bootcamp and had no issues. Just make sure
you partition with Guid
On 2011-08-24, at 5:36 PM, Valmor de Almeid
partition that has grub installed.
Of course its not as pretty as some of the things you can do in grub/grub2,
but it does work.
The only downside is that you need to register on their forums in order to
download the latest betas :(
- Nick
--
Pablo Picasso<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/pablo_picasso.html>
- "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
Hey Guys,
Thank you for your posts, I will keep working on Gentoo + UltraMonkey 3. I
use it on Debian it is very useful. Will keep those of you whom are
interested posted.
Regards,
Ninus.
Hey Mike,
Thanks a lot sir... Much appreciated.
Regards,
Ninus.
So no Ultramonkey 3 on Gentoo? Anyone?
Hello Everyone,
Does anyone have any experience building Ultramonley 3 on Gentoo. I
downloaded ultramonkey 3 from here "
http://www.ultramonkey.org/download/3/source/ultramonkey-3-1um.1.tar.gz";. It
is in the source folder but Is see no source. I understand how this could be
an ultramonkey questio
Hello Gentlemen,
Thank you for your responses, I do apologize for the inconvenience. So all I
have to do is modify /etc/make.conf by adding mysql and emerge libdbi. I do
not need to install mysql server, this machine only needs mysqlclient.
Thanks again for your help.
Nick
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009
Hello Everyone I am new to gentoo, usually I use Debian. I have a fresh
install x86 2.6.30 kernel and I was trying to get Ultramonkey going on the
box. I looking for the equivilant to the following deb packages for Gentoo
please
* libdbi-perl
* libdbd-mysql-perl
* libmysqlclient14-dev
If you feel
Hey Xavier,
I do appologize for the two messages, it will not happen again. When issuing
a "find /lib/modules/`uname -r` -name ip_vs*.ko" I see only
"/lib/modules/2.6.30-gentoo- r6/kernel/net/netfilter/ip_vs.ko"
I do not see the rest
#lvs
ip_vs
ip_vs_rr
ip_vs_wrr
ip_vs_lc
ip_vs_wlc
ip_vs_lblc
i
Hey Walt,
I build the kernel via:
make menuconfig
make
make modules_install
cp arch/... /boot/...
I did issue a depmod and still just:
/lib/modules/2.6.30-gentoo-r6/kernel/net/netfilter/ip_vs.ko"
when issuing a "find /lib/modules/`uname -r` -name ip_vs*.ko"
Thanks in Adnvanced,
Ninus
Hey Albert,
When issuing a "find /lib/modules/`uname -r` -name ip_vs*.ko" I see only
"/lib/modules/2.6.30-gentoo-r6/kernel/net/netfilter/ip_vs.ko"
I do not see the rest
#lvs
ip_vs
ip_vs_rr
ip_vs_wrr
ip_vs_lc
ip_vs_wlc
ip_vs_lblc
ip_vs_lblcr
ip_vs_dh
ip_vs_sh
ip_vs_sed
ip_vs_nq
ip_vs_ftp
Thanks
Hello everyone I am having problems with using LVS in Gentoo, I needed the
following modules built into the kernel:
ip_vs
ip_vs_rr
ip_vs_wrr
ip_vs_lc
ip_vs_wlc
ip_vs_lblc
ip_vs_lblcr
ip_vs_dh
ip_vs_sh
ip_vs_sed
ip_vs_nq
ip_vs_ftp
How I recompile the kernel is select the module that I need
IP vi
How I recompile the kernel is select the module that I need
IP virtual server support
>> -> [*] TCP load balancing
>> -> [*] UDP load balancing
>>
> then do a make followed by a make modules_install.
ip_vs is in my list of modules (the only ip_vs*) and does not return an
I have included in my kenrel configuration the following:
IP virtual server support
-> [*] TCP load balancing
-> [*] UDP load balancing
I have added to /etc/modules.autoload.d/kernel-2.6 the follwing
#lvs
ip_vs
ip_vs_rr
ip_vs_wrr
ip_vs_lc
ip_vs_wlc
ip_vs_lblc
ip_vs_lblcr
1) Security is for exploiting
2) If they are well versed on the drivers that virtualization technologies
use, then yes they can tell they are on a virtual machine and not on
dedicated server.
3) You can bridge network connection "physically on the network" minus the
nic of course
4) Virtualization
Hello Everyone,
I am using my laptop to test virtualization before setting it up on the
servers. I am familiar with vmware but since I am unable to get vmwre-server
going on kernel 2.6.3r5, I am using virtualbox. My question is in terms of
the "HardDisk" setting. The host has SATA hdd and I do not
1 - 100 of 1046 matches
Mail list logo
