Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 22:34 +0200, Maarten wrote:
Albert Hopkins wrote:
# ldd e2fsck/e2fsck
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb8033000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7edb000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb8034000)
Ehm, exactly. So yes, it uses less lib
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Maarten schrieb am 24.09.2008 21:39:
Can anyone help with this ? Does this package not support building
static ? The USE flag is there for a reason, no? Did I take the wrong
approach here ? What is up with this [damn] package ?!?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 21:39 +0200, Maarten wrote:
Hi List,
[...]
# Grep works fine...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd /bin/grep
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xe000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e42000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7f96000)
thou
xr-x 1 root root 159896 Sep 24 21:17 /sbin/e2fsck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ file /sbin/e2fsck
/sbin/e2fsck: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV),
for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
Thanks in advance for any insights...
Maarten
ve to using the installer.
What now?
TIA
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 18 February 2006 15:05, Maarten wrote:
>
>>Ryan Tandy wrote:
>>
>>>Maarten wrote:
>>Oh well, it only amounts to 23 days of my Athlons' undivided attention.
>>I'll live. ;-)
>
>
> 23 days conpressed into one second
Ryan Tandy wrote:
> Maarten wrote:
>
>> Or else, if /usr can be mounted
>> noexec without trouble, I'll donate 75 bogomips to the FSF.
>>
>
> Can we get that in writing, with a signature, creative use of {sym,hard}
> links and nested mounts notwi
imply confused 'noexec' with 'ro'. Shit happens... :-)
This must be the explanation for sure. Or else, if /usr can be mounted
noexec without trouble, I'll donate 75 bogomips to the FSF.
Maarten
P.S.:
The thread this derived from has to be the most lame discussion I
time you update something.
>
> Jaja. You know, your exaggerations become boring...
Well, no. It is correct. How do you expect to install something when /usr is
mounted RO ?
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
gracefully, at least that has been my experience. I still have to guess
at the exact reason that stays-at-100% happens, if anyone can explain...
Good luck,
Maarten
>
> Well the first thing you need to do, is run a 'df' and see which
> partitions are full. Then used these to
d.
>I hope this saves someone else the time.
Hear hear.
Maarten
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Gilberto Martins wrote:
> What is OP ?
>
_O_riginal _P_oster, I believe.
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
or-: Kernel panic -
cannot mount root partition) but it is unable to find 'init' there.
>From that, one can deduce the OP probably pointed the kernel to the
wrong root partition (ie. /boot, or /usr, etc.)
Maarten
> Boot from the live CD, mount your root, and do:
>
> cp -a
el
>
>
>
> Which "init=" I should use ? the problem is the lack of a "initrd"
> file ? I tried to read mkinitrd man page, but I guess this does not
> apply.
>
> This is the lilo.conf.
>
>
> lba32
> boot = /dev/hdb
> default=gentoo
> menu-sche
a)
If you have no hda, or if hda is the CDrom, it may be prudent to change
the cabling so that linux is on the /dev/hda device. Altough it is
possible to boot from the slave drive, but it is more straightforward to
boot from the master, and you may save yourself some headaches.
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> On Sunday 12 February 2006 07:37, Maarten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about
> '[gentoo-user] Handling of config updates, RFC':
>
>>What tickles me the most about the current process is that one sometimes
>>gets huge lists
Rumen Yotov wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:37 +0100, Maarten wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Check "cfg-update" it's in portage, and i think it the better.
> i'm using it together with "dispatch-conf" but think if switching
> completely to 'cfg-update
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:37:41 +0100, Maarten wrote:
>
>
>>What tickles me the most about the current process is that one sometimes
>>gets huge lists of updated files by updating a single package. A package
>>which may have never been used, or
ed before ?
Wouldn't this make the updating a much less painful process ?
What, if any, would be possible pitfalls using this approach ?
Thank you for your time reading this,
Maarten v d Berg
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
;
> /bin/link
> /bin/ln
^^^
Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the
symlink from ln -> busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ?
Maarten
> Benno
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Michael Mauch wrote:
> Maarten wrote:
>
>
>>All is cleared up now. Sorry for bothering you.
>
>
> FWIW, you could also run "udevinfo -d" to see all your devices, and use
> the left side of its output for "udevinfo -a -p".
Wow, yes, that is a use
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:45:51 +0100, Maarten wrote:
>
>
>>I need to distinguish several, mostly identical, USB devices from each
>>other by assigning them unique static names. I know there are primers(*)
>>that describe the process, and I try to
nor anywhere else.
And this is not just that special USB device. I tried connecting mice,
memory sticks, cardreaders, network interfaces, even hubs... nothing.
Can someone please help me ? I've been wrestling with this issue for
weeks now... :-(
Thanks in advance,
Maarten
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
23 matches
Mail list logo
