> On 11/10/2015 09:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> >> On 11/10/2015 02:00 PM, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> >>> I guess from this your assuming that everyones passwords that
> >>> have been hacked are god, birthdays and such?
> >>>
> >> Again: assu
I am going to stop this convo. As soon as you say it cant be brute forced,
I am going to move on.
Good luck with that.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 02:00 PM, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> >
> > I guess from this your assuming that everyones
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 11/10/2015 01:26 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >
> > I think you are approaching this problem from the wrong viewpoint. You
> > have to assume an attacker has vastly more resources to bear on the
> > problem than you have. Thanks to Amaz
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> A major upgrade to OpenSSH is being stabilized:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18
>
> The default of PermitRootLogin for sshd in the new version is
> "prohibit-password". If you typically log in to the root account over
What did you update? Nothing I remember recently came out to break like
this.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Like a stupid dumbfuck, I tried to update my machine today
>
> tortoise ~ # revdep-rebuild
> /bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libtinfo.so.5: can
People do it all the time. You have to set up the amd64's to cross compile.
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Distcc/Cross-Compiling
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Joseph wrote:
> I have an old eeepc 1GB ram and would like to install Gentoo on it as
> Xubuntu and Fedora both failed providing the p
Looks like they have a couple people taking care of it:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/media-libs/glyr/ChangeLog?view=markup
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Henrique Lengler <
henriquel...@openmailbox.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 05:56:48PM +0200, Alan McKinnon
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> Looks like your problem is not the same. I'm just starting myself to
> come to grips with this part of nagios, so I don't know how much further
> hhelp I can be.
>
> One thing that does stick out though is the taken literally, your error
> o
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 12:52 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> Assuming nagios runs as user 'nagios', can you run:
> # ldd /usr/bin/ndomod.o
>
--()-[78s)# sudo su - nagios
nagios@kyle ~ $ ldd /usr/bin/ndomod.o
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7fff6e1c7000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x7f9dee041000)
/lib6
Copyright (c) 2009
Nagios Core Development Team and Community Contributors
[18-12-2012 17:39:07] LOG VERSION: 2.0
[
Let me know if I missed something.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> On 08/09/2014 02:32, Jeff Smelser wrote:
> > I have been racking my head trying
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:02 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> What is the result of the following:
>
> # ls -lsah /usr/bin/ndomod.o
>
> ?
>
--()-[0s)# ls -lsah /usr/bin/ndomod.o
76K -rwxr-xr-x 1 nagios nagios 75K Sep 7 19:26 /usr/bin/ndomod.o
I have been racking my head trying to figure out why this module wont load.
All the privs are correct as far as I can see.
Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: Nagios 3.5.1 starting... (PID=32513)
Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: Local time is Sun Sep 07 19:22:32 CDT 2014
Sep 7 19:22:32 kyle nagios: LOG VERS
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 03:37 pm, abhay wrote:
> I nailed it on my system. I had some free time so installed gdb and ran
> amarok. Looks like if "Retrieve similar artists" is checked under Last.fm,
> it crashes amaroK. I unchecked the option and now it runs flawlessly. Check
> it in your cas
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:55 pm, Benjamin Martin wrote:
> True that the installations become identical very soon. But what if I set
> up server using stage 1 and an up-to-date portage tree. After the
> installation is finished it'll sit around doing whatever it's supposed to
> do and I don'
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:50 pm, Derek Tracy wrote:
> That is what I was thinking when I switched to stable. From what I am
> seeing either my computer doesn't like stable code or stable does not mean
> stable anymore.
But thats not what you said. I Quote:
"In the past I have alway
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 10:05 am, Preston Hagar wrote:
> Although amarok is probably my favorite audio player, I have found it to be
> a little finicky. I usually find it works best with xine. I usually use a
> "-arts -gstreamer xine" so xine is the only engine available. I also
> usually ha
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 12:02 pm, abhay wrote:
> Same problem here as well but since I use KMail, I know what is happening.
> Amarok is crashing weirdly. Amarok crashes and tries to send a bug report
> using KMail but interestingly it keeps on playing music and does what it is
> supposed to bu
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 09:42 am, Fernando Meira wrote:
> been using amaroK for a long time now, and just few days ago, something
> weird started to happen.
> At some point, when changing song, I get an error message saying that
> amaroK was unable to launch Kmail.
> I do not have Kmail, so I
On Monday 07 November 2005 03:38 pm, Jarry wrote:
> As I said previously: fixing errors later is my problem. But if I do
> not close some security leak, it would be then problem for me and maybe
> someone else too. There are too many unpatched and vulnerable computers
> on the net, I did not want
On Monday 07 November 2005 03:52 pm, Holly Bostick wrote:
> No, no, Jeff, that is apparently where you are wrong:
Heh, I missed this tidbit..
> Jarry schreef:
> > Well, this will be probably criticised, but after every upgrade
> > (independently of what was really updated) I restart sshd, named,
On Monday 07 November 2005 02:04 pm, Jarry wrote:
> > Which you are not doing, and frankly, you're pretty lucky that something
> > hasn't blown up up to now.
>
> That might happen, sooner o later. But still I think it is still better
> than leaving some hole for uninvited visitors.
> Thanks for you
On Thursday 03 November 2005 07:49 am, C. Beamer wrote:
> ERROR 2002 (HY000): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket
> '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (111)
>
> I googled for this and gather that it has something to do with the
> placement of the mysqld.sock file.
>
> The problem is the
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 05:47 pm, kashani wrote:
> Don't think you could have brought up the fact that you're complaining
> about the shortcomings of Mysql in an entirely different class than I
> and likely the original poster were talking about? I'd have wanted to
> know a bit more ab
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 02:23 pm, kashani wrote:
> Because once you start caring about your db that much it's usually
> easier to setup a crap box that replicates off your master. Then you can
> lock the whole db on your slave and do a mysqldump without causing
> issues on your main db
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 12:52 pm, C. Beamer wrote:
> Up until now, what I needed to do in MySQL, I could do just fine and
> never even knew about mysqldump until recently. As I previously stated,
> I've only been using Gentoo since September. When I used to use FC4,
> all I ever did was ma
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 04:58 pm, C. Beamer wrote:
> A better description would have been that the restore worked. However,
> the only database that was restored was the test database. The database
> that I had created by creating a directory that was named after the
> database that I had cr
On Sunday 30 October 2005 05:15 pm, C. Beamer wrote:
> In September, when I wiped Fedora Core off my main system and installed
> Gentoo, I had a MySQL database that I used for one reason and one reason
> only. To get my database files from the FC4 system to Gentoo, I just
> copied them to a ZIP d
On Friday 21 October 2005 07:21 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> which a) does not catch all the cases
> and b) would not be needed at all, if you don't do '--deep' updates.
Your trolling, arnt you? Are you really so naive that you think not having
--deep solves all your problems? You do reali
On Friday 21 October 2005 03:30 pm, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
> sorry by the way I put it Jeff I got to angry when All my services
> stop working after an ( what should be simple ) update .
Actually, I wasn't referring to your email, I was referring to Hemmann's.
Jeff
--
gentoo-user@gen
On Friday 21 October 2005 02:24 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> what do you mean 'crashed'?
>
> does revdep-rebuilt still works?
>
> but at least now you know why you should not use --deep.
Why not? I use it here and I never get crashes.. One doesnt mean the other.
Jeff
--
gentoo-user@gentoo
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 10:55 pm, Statux wrote:
> I've got a 3.0GHz P4 with HyperThreading (Intel 531 processor for those
> of you who know of the Intel Processor Numbers) - kernel 2.6.13. I've
> enabled SMP and the HT scheduling option in the kernel config along with
> ACPI as I was told tha
31 matches
Mail list logo
