Hello Gentoo users,
I just can't fsck my root device because my Gentoo system don't allow me
to remount it as readonly (mount -o ro,remount /dev/hda1). A rw-mounted
device is unsafe to be fsck -ed. (AFAIK).
When I go to tty1, login as root, do these:
killall kdm, then init 1. It goes to runl
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:56 +0200, Gyuszk wrote:
Dear Gentoo users,
I have an amd64 gentoo. It runs up-to-date components. It is running
with stable ebuilds (except of some ebuilds like monodevelop).
I've emerged some games too, and thats my problem. Most of
ion fault in Hungarian)**
[16:51:50] ~ $
Liquid wars:
[16:51:50] ~ $ liquidwar
Starting Allegro (http://www.talula.demon.co.uk/allegro) - success!
Allegro ID : Allegro 4.2.2, Unix
Loading config options from "/home/gyuszk/.liquidwarrc" - success!
Installing timer (driver="Unix pthreads timers&qu
ut':
>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:10:39 +0100
>>> Gyuszk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> It works for me under PWM,which uses mouse hover focus rather than
>>> mouse click focus for windows. Maybe that's the difference that
en
started from pure x11 session with xterm.
It is a workaround, that I run games from a pure x11 session, but...
Can you tell me how to fix this keyboard issue? Is there any chance to
get it workin'?
Thanks a lot.
Gyuszk
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Grant Edwards írta:
> On 2007-02-24, Gyuszk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Dear gentoo users,
>>
>> As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
>> emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
>>
Thomas Rösner írta:
> Grant Edwards schrieb:
>> On 2007-02-24, Gyuszk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear gentoo users,
>>>
>>> As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
>>> emerges it, Gnome menu call,
Dear gentoo users,
As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one
emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about
box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why?
Is really development version of Firefox in Portage, or what?
Thanks a lo
Etaoin Shrdlu írta:
> On Saturday 24 February 2007 13:38, Gyuszk wrote:
>
>
>> All in all: I want to connect (using TightVNC Win32) to the existing
>> DISPLAY:0 (gnome) session. Is it possible?
>>
>
> I think you need a VNC server that allows connection
he existing
DISPLAY:0 (gnome) session. Is it possible?
If isn't, the following will do:
a GDM session opens in my VNC window, and I can login to my account into
gnome. With existing user, with existing home folder.
I hope I was clear. Sorry for my English, I'm from Hungary.
Thanks in advanc
b.n. írta:
> Peter Ruskin ha scritto:
>
>> On Friday 23 February 2007, Gyuszk wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Gentoo users,
>>>
>>> I have a question about Win32 emulation. I'm using Wine
>>> (0.9.31 ~x86 in Portage) for mIRC and uT
Bo Ørsted Andresen írta:
> On Friday 23 February 2007 13:29:57 Gyuszk wrote:
>
>> My question: is it possible to have Wine and Cedega installed on the same
>> system?
>>
>
> Sure. They don't collide in any way. One uses .wine the other .cedega... Just
Dear Gentoo users,
I have a question about Win32 emulation. I'm using Wine (0.9.31 ~x86
in Portage) for mIRC and uTorrent usage. It works flawlessly. Today I
bought a new video card (nvidia 6600) for gaming. With this card,
everything is OK.
My question: is it possible to have Wine and Ced
Bo Ørsted Andresen írta:
> On Monday 19 February 2007 22:40:32 Gyuszk wrote:
>
>> As this email is clear text, I cannot mark, but from the USE flags, it
>> is obvious that Portage now considers all my USE flag demands, although
>> emerge -pvN world don't. Th
lite
-xbase" 1,051 kB
As this email is clear text, I cannot mark, but from the USE flags, it
is obvious that Portage now considers all my USE flag demands, although
emerge -pvN world don't. That is what I don't understand.
Is this a possible Portage bug, or I just messed up some
15 matches
Mail list logo
