Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2

2009-04-04 Thread Christopher Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote: > Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and > performed "emerge system" ? > What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell... > > -- > ~adj~ I am afraid I can't really

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's advantage: 'optimized for your system' -- huh?

2009-02-06 Thread Christopher Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Freitag 06 Februar 2009, Christopher Walters wrote: > >> for 64-bit systems, Debian and its child Ubuntu, have packages compiled to >> use the "generic x86_64" option, so they can be use

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's advantage: 'optimized for your system' -- huh?

2009-02-06 Thread Christopher Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Mike Edenfield wrote: > On 2/5/2009 7:01 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> no. He is an idiot if he does not read the docs. Simple. Like people >> who don't >> read the manual to their car or vcr and then complaining if something >> does not >> w

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo's advantage: "optimized for your system" -- huh?

2009-02-03 Thread Christopher Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2009 01:48:34 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> So all in all, I agree. Using Gentoo is nowadays not so much a matter >> of performance optimization but of better control of how to build the > I also get si

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.2 compile problem

2009-02-03 Thread Christopher Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dirk Uys wrote: > Hi > > Have anyone else successfully built kde4.2? > > Regards > Dirk Hi Dirk, I was able to compile KDE 4.2 successfully with no problems, without using anything outside of Portage. What arch are you using? Did you use the ne

Re: [gentoo-user] qt blockages...

2009-01-18 Thread Christopher Walters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Mark Knecht wrote: > Hi, >I'm not used to seeing all the additional messages below the > blockage indication. Can someone possibly help me understand how to > read this? > >Are there really application packages that cannot be installed at >