Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> Brandon Enright wrote:
>
> >
> > So from your output a couple issues stick out. You're only peering with
> > one machine which generally doesn't work so well. You're probably
> > better off just using ntpdate periodically i
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 02:41 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> Brandon Enright wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 01:32 -0600, Anthony E. Caudel wrote:
> >
> >>My system was off about 10 days and when I turned it back on, I began
> >>getting these messages in
needed to stabilize but it still gets them. I
> have ntp-client and ntpd both in the "default" runlevel.
>
> This seems like an awful high number of resets. Much more than I used
> to get.
>
> Tony
Those are some pretty big jumps. What does "ntpq -c peers"
Not directly that I'm aware of. You could build a binary package of it so that
you re-emerge your binary at a later date.
You may also want to look into ccache as it can dramatically speed up a
re-compile of a package.
--Brandon
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Persson [mailto:[EMAIL
4 matches
Mail list logo
