Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 22:37:21 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > Making the 'official' overlay paludis-only was a BIG mistake. > > > > It's not "paludis-only", it will work with any package manager whose > > developers care enough to support the useful features of the kdebuild-1 > > EAPI. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Solid with Networkmanager Support

On Sunday 27 January 2008 20:03:32 Thomas Kahle wrote: > i'm trying to get Networkmanager support in KDE, but i cannot compile > kde-base/solid with networkmanager use flag. > It seems like portage just filters the flag, as it is in braces... > > emerge output shows > USE="bluetooth (-networkmanage

Re: [gentoo-user] Speed up with pbzip2 or not!?

On Sunday 27 January 2008 18:29:56 Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Why not an universal wrapper script ? > > maybe something like: > >     magic-uncompress [-t ] [-c] [-o ] >     > This script could try to find out the input format automatically > (the optional -t parameter allows to explicitly specifiy t

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.0?

On Saturday 26 January 2008 02:21:23 maxim wexler wrote: > #emerge -avD kde-base/kde-meta:kde-4 > > eight times and everytime I needed to add something to > > package.keywords, like so: > >=x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 ~x86 > >=app-crypt/gpgme-1.1.6 ~x86 > >=dev-util/cmake-2.4.7-r1 ~x86 > >=dev-libs/rasqal-0.

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.0?

On Saturday 26 January 2008 10:59:15 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:19:48 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote: > > [blocks B ] > blocking kde-base/kdelibs-4.0.0) > > > > From the gentoo-kde4-faq: > > > > Q: You said I could install KDE 3.5 and KDE 4.0, but > > they block each other!

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.0?

On Friday 25 January 2008 19:45:39 maxim wexler wrote: > > Which is rather pointless given that the KDE docs > > provides example > > package.{keywords,unmask} files... > > > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/kde/kde4.xml > > Thanks for this. The link from kde.org goes to a page > dated Dec 1

Re: [gentoo-user] Polymake Ebuild and general questions

On Sunday 20 January 2008 17:57:51 Thomas Kahle wrote: > I've written an ebuild for a math-software called polymake > (www.math.tu-berlin.de/polymake). > You find it attached. You have to digest it yourself to use. > ("ebuild polymake-2.3.ebuild digest") > Maybe some people could test it (on amd64

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.0?

On Thursday 24 January 2008 21:33:12 Dale wrote: > I emerged autounamsk and used the command "autounmask > kde-base/kde-meta-4.0.0" without the quotes of course.  There may be a > block or two.  I had one that involved qt.  I also had to mask qt 4.4 > since it does not have dbus support. Which is

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 first impressions

On Monday 21 January 2008 09:42:17 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Kontact works properly and so does the kmail component. > kmail on it's own does not work. wtf is up with that anyway? erm... kdepim (including kontact and kmail) wasn't released with kde 4.0.0 at all... -- Bo Andresen signature.asc De

Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage

On Friday 18 January 2008 15:36:29 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Roll on KDE4 when this monolithic nonsense will go away and there > > > will only be -meta ebuilds. > > > > Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are > > now the default which means they are listed first in any

Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage

On Friday 18 January 2008 01:08:51 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are > > now the default which means they are listed first in any-of dependency > > blocks such as e.g. || ( kde-base/kompare:kde-4 kde-base/kdesdk:kde-4 ) > > in KDE 4. But m

Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage

On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:06:28 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Roll on KDE4 when this monolithic nonsense will go away and there will > only be -meta ebuilds. Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are now the default which means they are listed first in any-of dependency b

Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage

On Thursday 17 January 2008 16:28:24 Grant Edwards wrote: > How does one figure out where these "blocks" are coming from? > There are no other versions of kompare installed. > kde-base/kdesdk-3.5.7 _is_ installed. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kde-split-ebuilds.xml -- Bo Andresen signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:10:11 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Itanium2. > > You don't want to go there. Trust me. > > It's a bastard evolution of one of Intel's worst ideas ever I thought that would be Pentium 4 EE. :P -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

On Monday 14 January 2008 14:03:52 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Now I am confused. Why do you run Putty on a Linux machine? > > I used it once just to confuse and confound co-workers and have it > runable in Wine just to impress some other people. You do not need wine to run putty on Linux. There's a UN

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

On Monday 14 January 2008 10:48:08 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: > > > You can use Daniel Robbins' stage3s: > > > > Why should I? They're likely also built with different use flags than > > the ones I use. Thus I will end up recompiling anyway. > > Ah ok, I wrongly thought yours was more a problem of outdat

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 overlay

On Friday 11 January 2008 22:26:34 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Anyone know where this overlay disappeared to? It moved to git. Assuming dev-util/git is installed: # layman -f && layman -d kde && layman -a kde Having said that KDE 4.0.0 should show up as package.mask'ed in gentoo-x86 within a few day

Re: [gentoo-user] Suddenly emerging unstable packages = why?

On Tuesday 08 January 2008 23:30:51 Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > > > However, it is true that emerge sync and eix-update were in two > > > separate jobs scheduled an hour apart. It is vaguely conceivable > > > that they got out of step somehow. I've unified them, and hope > > > things go better now. [..

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: besides package.use where to store info needed at emerge

On Thursday 03 January 2008 19:12:50 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:01:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Sorry to keep nagging with this but I must still not have it right. I > > do not see that compile flag being set during emerge: > > It looks like the cvs ebuild doesn't use

Re: [gentoo-user] No help on annoying `sandbox' error

On Friday 28 December 2007 22:58:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write > out of its crib. > > I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention. > Possibly this is something screamingly obvious and people just ignored > the post

Re: [gentoo-user] removing X

On Monday 24 December 2007 18:31:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm attempting to remove X from a former desktop machine now going to > see action as a semi-DMZ. > > What is the best way to go about removing X and all its files. > > Removing the basic x11-base/xorg-x11 is easy enough but there appea

Re: [gentoo-user] Paludis newbie questions [was: Excellent Paludis interview]

On Sunday 23 December 2007 18:56:40 David Relson wrote: > I suspect a better worded message would have let me find the > mistake Such as? -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Paludis newbie questions [was: Excellent Paludis interview]

On Saturday 22 December 2007 20:09:40 David Relson wrote: > As I'm a paludis newbie and as it allows a multitude of settings, I used > portage2paludis.bash to create /etc/paludis/use.conf. Whatever is > missing from use.conf is a combination of my ignorance and the script. > > A copy of use.conf i

Re: [gentoo-user] Paludis newbie questions [was: Excellent Paludis interview]

On Saturday 22 December 2007 02:50:54 David Relson wrote: > I'm experimenting with paludis. Seems fine, though a bit verbose and > cryptic. Running "paludis -i world" produces: > > Unhandled exception: > * In program paludis -i world: > * When making environment from specification '': >

Re: [gentoo-user] Rebuilding world & system after -march change

On Friday 21 December 2007 17:39:50 Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote: > Recently, I've changed the -march from k8 to athlon64 and it failed to > build packages. Am I doing something wrong here? I suspect that I am > supposed to rebuild some packages first before rebuilding with emerge > -eDNtv syst

Re: [gentoo-user] re-emerge glibc after linux-headers update?

On Thursday 20 December 2007 16:56:37 Grant wrote: > The ELOG for my linux-headers update says: > > Kernel headers are usually only used when recompiling your system libc, as > such, following the installation of newer headers, it is advised that you > re-merge your system libc. > Failure to do so

Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview

On Thursday 20 December 2007 09:43:20 Neil Bothwick wrote: > flagedit will warn you if you have any unsupported USE flags set. That > and eix-test-obsolete are useful for keeping make.conf and /etc/portage > clear of cruft. And the config-decruft ruby script that can be used with Paludis can do th

Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview

On Thursday 20 December 2007 10:08:13 Rumen Yotov wrote: > >> Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the > >> use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag. > > > > Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag exists. [...] > Regarding cl

Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview

On Thursday 20 December 2007 02:46:20 Iain Buchanan wrote: > > And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me > > over all over again. :) > > I've been wondering for a long time why portage doesn't continue with > building other packages when one fails - so long as deps are me

Re: [gentoo-user] Persistent revdep-rebuild issues: sun-jdk-1.4.2.16

On Thursday 20 December 2007 02:43:04 Dale wrote: > I have had mine showing it needed to recompile gcc for a very long time > now.  There is also a bug for it too.  It has been there for a really > long time.  There are hacks to work around the bug but some don't like > the hack and neither did I.

Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview

On Wednesday 19 December 2007 21:37:38 Rumen Yotov wrote: > Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the > use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag. Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag exists. Kind of curious how that relate

Re: [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules]

On Monday 17 December 2007 16:14:24 Raphael wrote: > Hey, I made someone laugh today. Good deed of the day: check! :P :) > I was unaware of Paludis. Re-reading the thread now, I saw that > someone mentioned it. After googling for it, seems a lot of people are > fond of it. Why is it not the defau

Re: [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules]

On Monday 17 December 2007 14:38:30 Raphael wrote: > So, even if Portage was recoded in C++, performance improvements > would be marginal and the cost in man-hours would be too high. It > would take months before reaching the maturity level Portage has now > and all this time could be better sp

Re: [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules]

On Sunday 16 December 2007 22:04:52 Randy Barlow wrote: > Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: > > In this case it's not really significant. The biggest performance hit for > > a package manager for Gentoo remains I/O no matter which language you > > use... > > Yeah, you a

Re: [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules]

On Sunday 16 December 2007 20:32:58 Randy Barlow wrote: > C++ is most certainly going to yield faster programs since it is a > machine compiled language and python is interpreted. In this case it's not really significant. The biggest performance hit for a package manager for Gentoo remains I/O no

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules

On Saturday 15 December 2007 20:00:54 Grant wrote: > > > The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is > > > Portage. There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in > > > it is hard because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of > > > activity in the tree b

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules

On Saturday 15 December 2007 15:05:28 Grant wrote: > > Neil correctly translated my pseudo-English to what I actually meant. I > > don't want to make Portage binary based. I just want to make Portage's > > binary package support more conveniently usable on big networks. Even eclasses in the tree d

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules

On Saturday 15 December 2007 03:35:51 Grant wrote: > My ideas aren't really important unless they're everyone else's ideas > too. What is it exactly you want to achieve by starting these pointless threads? -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerging virtual/editor installs nano - why?

On Friday 07 December 2007 18:58:57 Alexander Skwar wrote: > > You are right except for the fact that virtual/mta will not be converted > > any time soon (if ever). Old style virtuals allow their providers to > > block all other providers by blocking the virtual. This isn't possible > > with the cu

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerging virtual/editor installs nano - why?

On Friday 07 December 2007 16:21:31 Alexander Skwar wrote: > So the expectation should be, that it's not going to be possible > to preselect an mta the way I've shown, as soon as virtual/mta > is converted to a new style virtual. > > Is that right? Is there work going on to change all the old > sty

Re: [gentoo-user] Orphan libraries in my system

On Sunday 02 December 2007 10:24:50 Mick wrote: > Should I remove the lot?  (gcc-3.3.4 was unmerged from my system years > ago). Yes. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] The generated cache was invalid...

On Tuesday 20 November 2007 00:40:16 Iain Buchanan wrote: > I've been seeing this error during every emerge for a while now, and I > don't know where it comes from, or what it means: > > * Updating desktop mime database ... > * Updating shared mime info database ... > * Updating icons cache ...

Re: [gentoo-user] Building all packages except gcc

On Monday 19 November 2007 16:35:17 Dan Farrell wrote: > > How would I go about rebuilding all installed packages, except gcc? I > > suppose I could do "emerge --emptytree world", but that would also > > merge gcc, which I don't want, because I want to be sure that the > > whole system is rebuilt w

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/apr-0.9.12 pulled back by revdep-rebuild

On Saturday 17 November 2007 06:17:26 de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: > How do I find out why apr-0.9.12 and apr-util-0.9.12 are pulled back > when using revdep-rebuild? What I have currently is: This could be bug #189720 which would mean you need to manually remerge slot 1 of apr and apr-util. [1]

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc unmerged by accident

On Tuesday 13 November 2007 15:35:37 Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Dienstag, 13. November 2007 schrieb ext Florian Philipp: > > "busybox ash" > > And then? I guess Python will still not work -> no emerge. Then unpack the binpkg (which is needed either way as mentioned in other replies) on /. After t

Re: [gentoo-user] How do I pass options to emerge

On Tuesday 13 November 2007 16:15:31 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:37:02 +0200, Rumen Yotov wrote: > > > > The package netqmail allows me to specify the value QMAIL_CONF_SPLIT > > > > before it compiles. How do I actually set this value? How do I set > > > > optional flags when I bu

Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.4 is it safe to unmerge it ?

On Sunday 11 November 2007 18:28:15 Helmut Jarausch wrote: > I'm using a Python-2.5 based system since a year now. > (currently python-2.5.1-r3) > > I've run python-updater and revdep-rebuild. > > Is it safe to unmerge python-2.4.3-r1 (in my case)? Yes. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote: > If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: >emerge -e system >emerge -e world > you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. Clearly you are completely clueless. Do *NOT* do this. It w

Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

On Saturday 10 November 2007 00:13:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just tried and got this: > >     checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C > compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. > > and the log file says > >     gcc-config error: i68

Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ? > > > > Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ? > > Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from > upgrading?

Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

On Friday 09 November 2007 21:55:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [ ok ] ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd > ... > ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd > --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY > --- LOG FILE = > "/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-dev-lib

Re: [gentoo-user] Elibc & GNU userland...

On Tuesday 06 November 2007 21:18:30 pk wrote: > Can someone in the know explain what this means? I googled and saw that > GNU userland is related to Gentoo/BSD. Not really. Gentoo/GNU/Linux uses a GNU userland. Gentoo/*BSD uses a BSD userland.. > My guess would be that the Elibc is also BSD rel

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge openssl fails.

On Monday 29 October 2007 12:28:01 David Harel wrote: > After re-emerge glibc, same problem. Attached the log file in case I > missed a change with the problem. Just too bad you attached a log for the wrong package... Anyway, maybe downgrading linux-headers just wasn't such a good idea... Also..

Re: [gentoo-user] Writing an ebuild, #gentoo-dev-help best place?

On Sunday 28 October 2007 19:55:13 Peter Alfredsen wrote: > On Sunday 28 October 2007, Grant wrote: > > I'm writing an ebuild and need some help. Is #gentoo-dev-help the > > best place to get it? [...] > > I've been checking it all morning here: > > > > http://cgiirc.blitzed.org/ > > > > and it a

Re: [gentoo-user] Question re desktop-file-utils

On Friday 26 October 2007 22:19:23 Anthony E. Caudel wrote: > On several emerges I see the message " > > Install dev-util/desktop-file-utils, if you want to help to improve > Gentoo." > > Can't really tell what this package does but how does it help Gentoo? It validates .desktop files. If installe

Re: [gentoo-user] libxml++config.h missing - what package should provide the file?

On Thursday 25 October 2007 09:14:15 Alexander Skwar wrote: > I'm trying to compile gnome-extra/assogiate-0.2.0, and it fails, because > it cannot find "libxml++config.h": > > In file included from > /usr/include/libxml++-2.6/libxml++/exceptions/parse_error.h:25, from > ../libassogiate/mime-type.hh

Re: [gentoo-user] Huge problem

On Sunday 21 October 2007 18:23:16 Kenneth Prugh wrote: > > At the end running etc-update I found 26 config files to upgrade . > > Surely I did something wrong (to upgrade "udev" I had to unmerge > > "coldplug") and the result has been a failure in booting gentoo. > > Here is the message: > > > > /

Re: [gentoo-user] memoir blocking tetex?

On Friday 19 October 2007 11:22:00 Jules Colding wrote: > I'm trying to emerge memoir but it is blocking its own dependency - > tetex: > > ## > omc-2 ~ # emerge -va dev-tex/memoir > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculat

Re: [gentoo-user] etc-udpate error after emerge --sync and portage update

On Wednesday 17 October 2007 16:57:59 Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: > Since last emerge --sync and portage update i get the following when trying > to attempt an etc-update. > > diff: %file1: No such file or directory > diff: %/var/tmp/etc-update-19194/.diff-test-2: No such file or directory > ERROR: '

Re: [gentoo-user] portage sync error

On Monday 15 October 2007 12:29:42 Stefán István wrote: > Thanks for the tip, the manual update was successful. > Now I have another problem, when I try to update portage with the emerge > command: > > # emerge -pv portage > !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling... > > !!! Problem with sandbox

Re: [gentoo-user] portage sync error

On Monday 15 October 2007 11:00:03 Stefán István wrote: > We have a pc that hasn't been updated for a long time ago, and now I tried > to update it's portage with the "emerge --sync" command, but I got the > following > > error: > >>> Updating Portage cache: 89%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual packag

Re: [gentoo-user] whoa, this new(ish) portage is nice

On Wednesday 10 October 2007 20:53:51 Christopher Copeland wrote: > On 10 Oct 2007, at 13:57, Mark Shields wrote: > > I was thinking the same. I remember when I first started using > > Gentoo (2004?) when doing updates, I always wished it would spit > > out the notices at the end instead of every

Re: [gentoo-user] which binutils?

On Tuesday 09 October 2007 04:12:10 W.Kenworthy wrote: > > > On a mixed stable/unstable x86, which binutils should one generally > > > use? > > > > So why do you use multislot at all? > > On a previous job (long ago now) I was switching gcc's and needed > multislot. Now I dont. I presume if I rem

Re: [gentoo-user] which binutils?

On Tuesday 09 October 2007 02:56:06 W.Kenworthy wrote: > Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version > inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update > is in (not listed below) > > bunyip ~ # binutils-config -l > [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16 > [2] i686-pc-l

Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE "doc"

On Saturday 06 October 2007 21:01:06 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, > > > you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, > > > not the standard man/info pages. > > > > It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at

Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE "doc"

On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:32:31 Dale wrote: > > Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you > > normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the > > standard man/info pages. > > Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my

Re: [gentoo-user] How does module-rebuild know what's installed?

On Saturday 06 October 2007 00:13:20 Randy Barlow wrote: > Howdy, every time I try to run module-rebuild on one of my systems it > tries to emerge nvidia-legacy-drivers, which is no longer in portage. > It's no big deal because I can obviously emerge the packages that need > to be rebuilt manually,

Re: [gentoo-user] insatiable revdev-rebuild SOLVED

On Thursday 04 October 2007 16:07:16 Norman Rieß wrote: > >> It also told you to remove lib{crypto,ssl}.so.0.9.7 after running those > >> revdep-rebuild commands. [SNIP] > There was no remove command It used to tell you. ;) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159245 -- Bo Andresen sig

Re: [gentoo-user] undefined reference to `LINUX_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS'

On Wednesday 03 October 2007 23:55:49 Robert Szentmihalyi wrote: > Building gcc for ARM with > # crossdev --target arm-softfloat-uclinux-gnu Which means the you are more likely to get help on the gentoo-embedded mailing list. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sign

Re: [gentoo-user] insatiable revdev-rebuild

On Thursday 04 October 2007 05:37:19 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > An emerge (of openssl, I believe, but am not sure) a few days ago > triggered a request for me to run > # revdep-rebuild --library libcrypto.so.0.9.7 > # revdep-rebuild --library libssl.so.0.9.7 > > I have done so. The revdep-rebuil

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading the kernel

On Wednesday 03 October 2007 17:44:52 Jed R. Mallen wrote: > Thank you to all who responded. `make oldconfig` works as usual without the > worries. I was a bit apprehensive because of the gentoo kernel upgrade > guide warning about using oldconfigs but turns out it's safe afterall. I was kind of s

Re: [gentoo-user] per-ebuild compil options

On Wednesday 03 October 2007 02:38:42 Iain Buchanan wrote: > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:56 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > mkdir -p /etc/portage/env.d/sys-devel [SNIP] > hey that looks cool... except that it didn't work! I should be doing > this to dev-libs/glib and sys-libs/glibc right? > > $ cat /

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

On Wednesday 26 September 2007 10:59:00 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Pardon? "tar xf somefile" doesn't do any compression at all. > > I don't get what you mean. > > No, but it does do whatever decompression is required. Of course, you do > have to specify a compression method when creating a compressed

Re: [gentoo-user] shared portage tree

On Monday 24 September 2007 13:36:34 Daniel Iliev wrote: > Yes. This setup works here also and I have no breakages, but since I've > let the x86 machies use shared portage tree I have the feeling the > performance of portage dropped down notably. > > I don't know what happens at the end of "emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing CHOST

On Sunday 23 September 2007 02:13:46 David Relson wrote: > Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo, > it's time for upgrading CHOST :-> > > According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a > couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e. > > from: >

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.2.0 with java

On Saturday 22 September 2007 00:35:22 Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > After adding 'sys-devel/gcc gcj' string to 'package.use' file and > reemergeing (twicely) the gcc package 'revdep-rebuild' still shows: > > * Checking dynamic linking consistency > [ 49% ] * broken /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gn

Re: [gentoo-user] disable dropping to -j1 when building certain programs

On Thursday 20 September 2007 22:27:18 Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote: > I was not suggesting making ebuilds that will ignore mandatory -j1. I > was merely trying to find out what is the correct variable to use in > make.conf...I'm willing sacrifice my system for experimental purposes. I > rememb

Re: [gentoo-user] continue emerge on failure

On Thursday 20 September 2007 17:28:14 Pawel K wrote: > How to force emerge to continue build with the next > package in case previous build failed. Paludis >= 0.25 now has support for the ideal solution to this.. :) # paludis --help | grep continue -A 4 --continue-on-failure Whether to contin

Re: [gentoo-user] Meaning of bold/regular font in output from emerge

On Thursday 20 September 2007 15:07:20 Markus Schönhaber wrote: > Since portage 2.1.3.9 I sometimes see package names printed with > different colors and fonts in the output in emerge --ask ... > Example: > > # emerge --ask --update --deep world [SNIP] > In the above output ntp, git and openoffice

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.3.6 fails to compile (in a vserver)

On Thursday 20 September 2007 13:49:14 Alan McKinnon wrote: > http://www.ecos.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-04/msg00090.html https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131108 ? -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2.2: missing KEEPENV (with solution)

On Sunday 16 September 2007 15:51:28 Michael Mauch wrote: > the recent Apache 2.2.6 ebuild brought an /etc/init.d/apache2 that > doesn't honour the KEEPENV variable anymore. > > Formerly one could preserve some of the environment variables (while all > others would be unset to keep Apache's environ

Re: [gentoo-user] Dual failures in emerge -aDNvu world

Maybe attaching the snippet of the bochs log as a file would have been better. At least the wrapping of it is rather annoying... On Tuesday 18 September 2007 03:16:33 Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > jade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets-1.79/html/../common/../commo >n/dbl1sr.dsl:3:5:E: reference

Re: [gentoo-user] Playsound . . . won't!

On Monday 17 September 2007 23:05:29 Mick wrote: > > What version of gentoolkit is that? Clearly revdep-rebuild is doing > > something wrong. > > Fri Mar 30 18:51:11 2007 >>> app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 I'd try 0.2.4_pre7 then.. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-user] Playsound . . . won't!

On Monday 17 September 2007 14:41:37 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > broken /usr/lib/libakode_xiph_decoder.la (requires > > > /usr/lib/libOggFLAC.la) done. [SNIP] > More like revdep-rebuild doesn't know how to build libOffFLAC anymore as > the ebuild that put it there isn't in portage anymore or maske

Re: [gentoo-user] Playsound . . . won't!

On Monday 17 September 2007 12:29:20 Mick wrote: > Checking dynamic linking consistency... >   broken /usr/bin/playsound (requires  libFLAC.so.7) >   broken /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstflac.so (requires  libFLAC.so.7) >   broken /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.8/libgstossaudio.so (requires   > libgstinterfa

Re: [gentoo-user] Playsound . . . won't!

On Sunday 16 September 2007 00:11:24 Mick wrote: > I am using playsound in KDE to play system sounds, but it has stopped > working: > > $ /usr/bin/playsound chimes.wav > /usr/bin/playsound: error while loading shared libraries: libFLAC.so.7: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directo

Re: [gentoo-user] ERROR : sys-libs/db-4.5.20_p2 failed - econf failed

On Friday 14 September 2007 11:14:20 Jean-Philippe Caruana wrote: > /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.02/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries: > libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory If might be worth bringing this up on the gentoo-java mailing list. https://bugs.gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] sed does not work on profile 2006.1

On Thursday 13 September 2007 15:19:09 Kerry wrote: > When I try execute sed on Gentoo, I get "-bash: /usr/bin/sed:  No such file > or directory" It's /bin/sed now. Run `hash -r`. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

On Thursday 13 September 2007 05:41:59 Mark Knecht wrote: > > This latest emerge pass seems to be working better. I did have to skip > > a couple of packages though. I'll go back and see if I can catch them > > with revdep-rebuild when it hopefully finishes up in the next hour. [...] > db2omf: Coul

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

On Thursday 13 September 2007 05:58:16 Dan Farrell wrote: > > berkdb = sys-libs/db. apr-util is slotted and 0.9.12 is in a > > different slot than 1.2.8. > > this might give you some idea of what packages might be effected by the > nontrivial update of db: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ equery depends d

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

On Thursday 13 September 2007 05:32:07 Mark Knecht wrote: > That's very interesting. What about slotting issues? What if it's the > old version in a slot that needs to be rebuilt? (FYI - I don't really > understand slotting that much since I don't program. I've guessed it's > because some code need

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

On Thursday 13 September 2007 05:23:45 Mark Knecht wrote: > gda-firebird-recordset.c:517: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete > type make[2]: *** [gda-firebird-recordset.lo] Error 1 [...] > !!! ERROR: gnome-extra/libgda-1.2.3 failed. You really ought to learn to search bugzie.. :p https://

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:54:08 Mark Knecht wrote: > OK, the emerge -DuN world finished up and said everything was good. I > then ran revdep-rebuild and have a list of things that need to be > rebuilt. One has failed - dev-libs/apr-util. > > checking gdbm.h presence... yes > checking for gdb

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

On Thursday 13 September 2007 01:36:56 Mark Knecht wrote: > libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.la' or > unhandled argument `/usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.la' # ls -l /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.la # equery check gnome-vfs ? -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a d

Re: [gentoo-user] How to manage the upgrade.

On Wednesday 12 September 2007 20:59:50 econti wrote: > Hi all, it's me again. > Above all, thank you everybody for the help . . .but now I am a little > confused. > Well, here is what I understood: 0. Resolve blockages.. :p > 1 - first of all: to upgrade gcc following what explained here -> > >

Re: [gentoo-user] I can't build pango

On Wednesday 12 September 2007 18:20:19 Jean-Philippe Caruana wrote: > I try to build gnome on my system, but I can't build the pango dependence : [SNIP] > I put the build.log here : > [SNIP] > here is my make.conf :# cat /etc/make.conf > CHOST="i

Re: [gentoo-user] why unmerge acpid ?

On Wednesday 12 September 2007 00:34:51 Jesús Guerrero wrote: > > [ebuild R ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.18.0-r2 USE="acpi apm gnome > > hal ipv6 -debug -doc -gstreamer" 0 kB [...] >         if use acpi && ! use hal ; then [...] > That message appears when you emerge gnome-applets. And it is t

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade

On Tuesday 11 September 2007 16:53:58 Gary Rickert wrote: > A quick question / addition to this. It's not exactly related. In the future start a new thread instead and please don't top-post.. > When I am finished with an update I usually run etc-update. I was told last > week that this has been

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo 2007.0 installer problem (unpacking the stage tarball takes forever)

On Wednesday 05 September 2007 17:25:17 Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: > When i reach the screen when the stage tarball is unpacked (i choose the > stage from the LiveCD) the progress bar reachs the end and the letters > "done" appear in the progress bar, however, the "cancel" button does not > change i

Re: [gentoo-user] portage update problem

On Thursday 06 September 2007 17:22:15 Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: > Hello, just installed from gentoo LiveCd 2006.0 Why are you using such an ancient stage? > after an emerge --sync, i upgraded portage, everything was running smooth > until the unmerging of the previous portage version started, th

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >