Is there a way force openrc and wpa_supplicant to map a particular
access point to an interface or fail?
I have two AP's (each on a different ssid) to connect to so have two
wifi interfaces - unfortunately they are not equal so I want wlan0 to
connect to only one particular AP, and wlan1 to the ot
On 03/04/2022 19:37, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 05:05:07PM +0100 schrieb Wol:
Rsync has a bwlimit argument which helps here. Note that rsync copies
the whole file on what it considers local storage (which can be mounted
network shares) ... this can cause a real slowdown.
Am Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 05:05:07PM +0100 schrieb Wol:
> > > > Rsync has a bwlimit argument which helps here. Note that rsync copies
> > > > the whole file on what it considers local storage (which can be mounted
> > > > network shares) ... this can cause a real slowdown.
> > > It won't help on the
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 19:07:30 +0200, Arve Barsnes wrote:
> > > This file is for setting or unsetting USE flags on a package.
> > > To "mask the system USE flag" on libxcrypt you would put this in
> > > /etc/portage/package.use.mask:
> > > sys-libs/libxcrypt system
> >
> > Shouldn't that be /etc/po
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 at 18:43, Matthias Hanft wrote:
> And jdk-11 seems to need just openjdk (and not icedtea any more).
>
>
This is because icedtea doesn't exist for java 11 (at least in portage). If
you don't need it for anything in particular, I would go with your initial
thought to just mask >=
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 at 15:34, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 15:12:36 +0200, Arve Barsnes wrote:
>
> > This file is for setting or unsetting USE flags on a package.
> > To "mask the system USE flag" on libxcrypt you would put this in
> > /etc/portage/package.use.mask:
> > sys-libs/libxc
Martin Vaeth wrote:
>
> I guess that virtual/jdk prefers the non-binary package, and apparently
> portage is not able to resolve the conflict automatically by letting the
> binary package satisfy the dependency. If you manually install openjdk-bin,
> the problem is probably resolved.
Ahhh... yes,
On 03/04/2022 16:29, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 09:59:22AM +0100 schrieb Wols Lists:
On 03/04/2022 02:15, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
Rsync has a bwlimit argument which helps here. Note that rsync copies
the whole file on what it considers local storage (which can be mounted
ne
Am Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 09:59:22AM +0100 schrieb Wols Lists:
> On 03/04/2022 02:15, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > Rsync has a bwlimit argument which helps here. Note that rsync copies
> > the whole file on what it considers local storage (which can be mounted
> > network shares) ... this can cause a re
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 4:59 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> On 03/04/2022 02:15, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > Rsync has a bwlimit argument which helps here. Note that rsync copies
> > the whole file on what it considers local storage (which can be mounted
> > network shares) ... this can cause a real slowdo
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 4:25 AM Alexander Puchmayr
wrote:
>
> wasn't systemd per se, it was an update of /etc/nsswitch.conf. The old version
> had
>
> Hosts: mymachines files myhostname dns
>
> while the new version contains
>
> Hosts: mymachines resolve [!UNAVAIL=return] files my
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 15:12:36 +0200, Arve Barsnes wrote:
> This file is for setting or unsetting USE flags on a package.
> To "mask the system USE flag" on libxcrypt you would put this in
> /etc/portage/package.use.mask:
> sys-libs/libxcrypt system
Shouldn't that be /etc/portage/profile/package.use
On Sun, 3 Apr 2022 at 11:54, n952162 wrote:
> I'm not really clear on masking.
>
> 1. My /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords has no mention of glibc, so I
think there's nothing to unmask.
This file is for adding or removing keywords from packages (like amd64 or
~amd64).
To "unmask and enable the
Matthias Hanft wrote:
>
> Meanwhile I have found out that the culprit is "virtual/jdk".
No, the “culprit” is that you do not use the binary package openjdk
and you did apparently in the case of icedtea.
Icedtea and openjdk both have cups as a USE-flag, but this influences
only the runtime depend
Michael wrote:
>
> Did you try running emerge with '--tree' to see the dependency tree with all
> its dependencies? (The option '--deep' may show more dependencies too).
Meanwhile I have found out that the culprit is "virtual/jdk". I have 1.8.0-r6
installed, and emerge wants to upgrade to 11-r
On 4/3/22 10:27, Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2022, 10:23:25 CEST schrieb n952162:
My emerge fails due to a collision with xorg-server and glibc. How can I
find out where the problem is, actually?
Output attached.
Did you have a look at
https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-ite
On 03/04/2022 02:15, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
Rsync has a bwlimit argument which helps here. Note that rsync copies
the whole file on what it considers local storage (which can be mounted
network shares) ... this can cause a real slowdown.
It won't help on the initial copy, but look at the - I th
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2022, 10:23:25 CEST schrieb n952162:
> My emerge fails due to a collision with xorg-server and glibc. How can I
> find out where the problem is, actually?
>
> Output attached.
Did you have a look at
https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2021-10-18-libxcrypt-migration-sta
Thanks for the hint with mDNS, I wasn't aware of that. I'm using the '.local'
domain for all my machines for more than 15 years now, longer than mDNS
exists, but finally, after some research I found the problem, and actually it
wasn't systemd per se, it was an update of /etc/nsswitch.conf. The o
19 matches
Mail list logo
